社区获得性肺炎住院患者的单药治疗与联合治疗

Martin Kolditz, Michael Halank, Gert Höffken
{"title":"社区获得性肺炎住院患者的单药治疗与联合治疗","authors":"Martin Kolditz,&nbsp;Michael Halank,&nbsp;Gert Höffken","doi":"10.2165/00151829-200605060-00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current international guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) recommend therapy with a beta-lactam plus a macrolide or a 'respiratory' fluoroquinolone alone in patients hospitalized in a medical ward, and combination therapy with a beta-lactam plus a macrolide or a fluoroquinolone in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit. However, which of the available options should be preferred remains a matter of debate, and there are surprisingly few prospective randomized trials strictly comparing mono- versus dual therapy strategies in CAP patients. Thus, the recommendation of combining a macrolide with a beta-lactam rather than using a beta-lactam alone in hospitalized patients is derived mainly from observational data, and the suggested combination of a beta-lactam with a fluoroquinolone in severe CAP has been rarely examined in a clinical trial.As there have been sound theoretical arguments for and against combination therapy regimens, the rationale for the different options is discussed and available clinical trial data are reviewed in this article. A final conclusion about the superiority of one antibacterial regimen over another in hospitalized patients with CAP cannot be drawn on the basis of the limited data available. So far, combination therapy probably should be preferred in all patients presenting with severe pneumonia, whereas in general, combination therapy is not necessary in patients in a medical ward, and combination therapy with a beta-lactam plus a macrolide or monotherapy with a respiratory fluoroquinolone should be considered equivalent in this latter patient group. On the other hand, the available data demonstrate that empirical coverage of atypical bacteria in all patients with mild-to-moderate CAP seems unnecessary, and beta-lactam monotherapy might perform equally well when compared with respiratory fluoroquinolones in patients with non-severe CAP. Thus, the alternative use of a beta-lactam alone at adequate dosage in clinically stable patients seems justified, if CAP due to Legionella pneumophila is unlikely.</p>","PeriodicalId":87162,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","volume":"5 6","pages":"371-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200605060-00002","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy in Patients Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Kolditz,&nbsp;Michael Halank,&nbsp;Gert Höffken\",\"doi\":\"10.2165/00151829-200605060-00002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current international guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) recommend therapy with a beta-lactam plus a macrolide or a 'respiratory' fluoroquinolone alone in patients hospitalized in a medical ward, and combination therapy with a beta-lactam plus a macrolide or a fluoroquinolone in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit. However, which of the available options should be preferred remains a matter of debate, and there are surprisingly few prospective randomized trials strictly comparing mono- versus dual therapy strategies in CAP patients. Thus, the recommendation of combining a macrolide with a beta-lactam rather than using a beta-lactam alone in hospitalized patients is derived mainly from observational data, and the suggested combination of a beta-lactam with a fluoroquinolone in severe CAP has been rarely examined in a clinical trial.As there have been sound theoretical arguments for and against combination therapy regimens, the rationale for the different options is discussed and available clinical trial data are reviewed in this article. A final conclusion about the superiority of one antibacterial regimen over another in hospitalized patients with CAP cannot be drawn on the basis of the limited data available. So far, combination therapy probably should be preferred in all patients presenting with severe pneumonia, whereas in general, combination therapy is not necessary in patients in a medical ward, and combination therapy with a beta-lactam plus a macrolide or monotherapy with a respiratory fluoroquinolone should be considered equivalent in this latter patient group. On the other hand, the available data demonstrate that empirical coverage of atypical bacteria in all patients with mild-to-moderate CAP seems unnecessary, and beta-lactam monotherapy might perform equally well when compared with respiratory fluoroquinolones in patients with non-severe CAP. Thus, the alternative use of a beta-lactam alone at adequate dosage in clinically stable patients seems justified, if CAP due to Legionella pneumophila is unlikely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Treatments in respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"371-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200605060-00002\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Treatments in respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200605060-00002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200605060-00002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目前的国际社区获得性肺炎管理指南(CAP)推荐在病房住院的患者单独使用β -内酰胺加大环内酯类药物或“呼吸”氟喹诺酮类药物治疗,在重症监护病房住院的患者使用β -内酰胺加大环内酯类药物或氟喹诺酮类药物联合治疗。然而,哪一种可用的选择应该是首选仍然是一个争论的问题,并且令人惊讶的是,很少有前瞻性随机试验严格比较CAP患者的单一和双重治疗策略。因此,对住院患者联合大环内酯类药物与β -内酰胺而不是单独使用β -内酰胺的建议主要来自观察性数据,对于严重CAP患者联合使用β -内酰胺类药物与氟喹诺酮类药物的建议很少在临床试验中得到检验。由于存在支持和反对联合治疗方案的理论论据,本文讨论了不同选择的基本原理,并对现有的临床试验数据进行了回顾。关于一种抗菌方案优于另一种治疗住院CAP患者的最终结论不能根据有限的可用数据得出。到目前为止,所有出现严重肺炎的患者可能应该首选联合治疗,而一般情况下,在病房的患者没有必要联合治疗,在后一组患者中,β -内酰胺加大环内酯类药物联合治疗或单药氟喹诺酮类呼吸系统药物治疗应被认为是等效的。另一方面,现有数据表明,在所有轻度至中度CAP患者中,非典型细菌的经验覆盖似乎是不必要的,与非严重CAP患者的呼吸用氟喹诺酮类药物相比,β -内酰胺单药治疗的效果可能同样好。因此,如果因嗜肺军团菌引起的CAP不太可能发生,那么在临床稳定的患者中,以适当剂量单独使用β -内酰胺似乎是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy in Patients Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Current international guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) recommend therapy with a beta-lactam plus a macrolide or a 'respiratory' fluoroquinolone alone in patients hospitalized in a medical ward, and combination therapy with a beta-lactam plus a macrolide or a fluoroquinolone in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit. However, which of the available options should be preferred remains a matter of debate, and there are surprisingly few prospective randomized trials strictly comparing mono- versus dual therapy strategies in CAP patients. Thus, the recommendation of combining a macrolide with a beta-lactam rather than using a beta-lactam alone in hospitalized patients is derived mainly from observational data, and the suggested combination of a beta-lactam with a fluoroquinolone in severe CAP has been rarely examined in a clinical trial.As there have been sound theoretical arguments for and against combination therapy regimens, the rationale for the different options is discussed and available clinical trial data are reviewed in this article. A final conclusion about the superiority of one antibacterial regimen over another in hospitalized patients with CAP cannot be drawn on the basis of the limited data available. So far, combination therapy probably should be preferred in all patients presenting with severe pneumonia, whereas in general, combination therapy is not necessary in patients in a medical ward, and combination therapy with a beta-lactam plus a macrolide or monotherapy with a respiratory fluoroquinolone should be considered equivalent in this latter patient group. On the other hand, the available data demonstrate that empirical coverage of atypical bacteria in all patients with mild-to-moderate CAP seems unnecessary, and beta-lactam monotherapy might perform equally well when compared with respiratory fluoroquinolones in patients with non-severe CAP. Thus, the alternative use of a beta-lactam alone at adequate dosage in clinically stable patients seems justified, if CAP due to Legionella pneumophila is unlikely.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Nosocomial pneumonia : rationalizing the approach to empirical therapy. Managing asthma in expectant mothers. New strategies for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in sickle cell disease : the rationale for arginine therapy. Antioxidant strategies in respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1