[在德国脊柱手术中使用BMP-2的卫生-经济考虑]。

V Alt, H Haas, M A Rauschmann, C Carstens, J Franke, A Eicher, A Bitschnau, R Schnettler
{"title":"[在德国脊柱手术中使用BMP-2的卫生-经济考虑]。","authors":"V Alt,&nbsp;H Haas,&nbsp;M A Rauschmann,&nbsp;C Carstens,&nbsp;J Franke,&nbsp;A Eicher,&nbsp;A Bitschnau,&nbsp;R Schnettler","doi":"10.1055/s-2006-942338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>BMP-2 can replace autogenous bone grafting in lumbar one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIF). The current G-DRG system does not reimburse the upfront price of 2,970 euro per BMP-2 application for hospitals in Germany. The purpose of the current study was to create a health economic model to evaluate the financial savings for health care providers (hospitals) and health care payers (health care insurance) that can be achieved by the use of BMP-2 in spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previously published pooled data analysis was used in which BMP-2 showed significant improvements in the treatment after ALIF surgery compared to autogenous bone grafting, including earlier return to work time and reduced revision rates. These medical findings were transformed into economic data based on the regulations of the German health system of 2005.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The significantly shorter return to work time under BMP-2 treatment generates important financial savings for health care insurances offsetting the upfront prize of 2,970 euro for BMP-2. Savings for hospitals are mainly related to shorter surgery time due to the absence of the bone grafting procedure and faster discharge of the patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of improved medical outcome by BMP-2 treatment for the patient and net savings for the entire health care system in Germany represents a \"dominant\" strategy from a health economic perspective. This implicates that BMP-2 in ALIF procedures is to be recommended from a health economic point of view for the German health care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":76855,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete","volume":"144 6","pages":"577-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2006-942338","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Health-economic considerations for the use of BMP-2 for spinal surgery in Germany].\",\"authors\":\"V Alt,&nbsp;H Haas,&nbsp;M A Rauschmann,&nbsp;C Carstens,&nbsp;J Franke,&nbsp;A Eicher,&nbsp;A Bitschnau,&nbsp;R Schnettler\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-2006-942338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>BMP-2 can replace autogenous bone grafting in lumbar one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIF). The current G-DRG system does not reimburse the upfront price of 2,970 euro per BMP-2 application for hospitals in Germany. The purpose of the current study was to create a health economic model to evaluate the financial savings for health care providers (hospitals) and health care payers (health care insurance) that can be achieved by the use of BMP-2 in spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previously published pooled data analysis was used in which BMP-2 showed significant improvements in the treatment after ALIF surgery compared to autogenous bone grafting, including earlier return to work time and reduced revision rates. These medical findings were transformed into economic data based on the regulations of the German health system of 2005.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The significantly shorter return to work time under BMP-2 treatment generates important financial savings for health care insurances offsetting the upfront prize of 2,970 euro for BMP-2. Savings for hospitals are mainly related to shorter surgery time due to the absence of the bone grafting procedure and faster discharge of the patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of improved medical outcome by BMP-2 treatment for the patient and net savings for the entire health care system in Germany represents a \\\"dominant\\\" strategy from a health economic perspective. This implicates that BMP-2 in ALIF procedures is to be recommended from a health economic point of view for the German health care system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete\",\"volume\":\"144 6\",\"pages\":\"577-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2006-942338\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-942338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-942338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

介绍:BMP-2可替代自体植骨治疗腰椎一节段前路腰椎椎间融合(ALIF)。目前的G-DRG系统不报销德国医院每个BMP-2申请的前期费用2,970欧元。本研究的目的是建立一个卫生经济模型,以评估在脊柱手术中使用BMP-2可以为卫生保健提供者(医院)和卫生保健支付者(卫生保健保险)节省的资金。方法:先前发表的汇总数据分析显示,与自体植骨相比,BMP-2在ALIF手术后的治疗中有显着改善,包括更早的重返工作时间和更低的翻修率。根据2005年德国卫生系统的规定,这些医学发现被转化为经济数据。结果:在BMP-2治疗下,显著缩短了返回工作时间,为医疗保险节省了重要的资金,抵消了BMP-2的前期奖金2,970欧元。医院的节省主要与手术时间缩短有关,因为没有植骨手术,病人出院更快。结论:从健康经济的角度来看,BMP-2治疗对患者的医疗效果的改善和德国整个医疗保健系统的净储蓄的结合代表了一种“主导”战略。这意味着,从健康经济学的角度来看,在ALIF程序中推荐BMP-2为德国卫生保健系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Health-economic considerations for the use of BMP-2 for spinal surgery in Germany].

Introduction: BMP-2 can replace autogenous bone grafting in lumbar one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIF). The current G-DRG system does not reimburse the upfront price of 2,970 euro per BMP-2 application for hospitals in Germany. The purpose of the current study was to create a health economic model to evaluate the financial savings for health care providers (hospitals) and health care payers (health care insurance) that can be achieved by the use of BMP-2 in spine surgery.

Methods: A previously published pooled data analysis was used in which BMP-2 showed significant improvements in the treatment after ALIF surgery compared to autogenous bone grafting, including earlier return to work time and reduced revision rates. These medical findings were transformed into economic data based on the regulations of the German health system of 2005.

Results: The significantly shorter return to work time under BMP-2 treatment generates important financial savings for health care insurances offsetting the upfront prize of 2,970 euro for BMP-2. Savings for hospitals are mainly related to shorter surgery time due to the absence of the bone grafting procedure and faster discharge of the patient.

Conclusions: The combination of improved medical outcome by BMP-2 treatment for the patient and net savings for the entire health care system in Germany represents a "dominant" strategy from a health economic perspective. This implicates that BMP-2 in ALIF procedures is to be recommended from a health economic point of view for the German health care system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nachruf [Knowledge transfer and student's satisfaction in orthopaedics--a survey of 476 students]. [Differential behaviour of human adult arthrotic chondrocytes under 2D- and 3D-cultivation set-ups in a collagen I gel]. [Total hip replacement in high total hip dislocation by performing a Z-shaped shortening osteotomy]. [Measurement of ground reaction forces after total hip arthroplasty using different surgical approaches].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1