{"title":"[翻修型全髋关节置换术围手术期发病率的预测因素]。","authors":"S Kinkel, S Kessler, T Mattes, H Reichel, W Käfer","doi":"10.1055/s-2007-960504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The awareness and prevention of perioperative morbidity are essential in revision total hip arthroplasty [THA]. Therefore, it was the purpose of this study to assess the rate of perioperative complications following revision THA in order to evaluate the impact of patient- and procedure-related variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>169 consecutive patients with a mean age of 71.7 years suffering from aseptic loosening of their THA were included in this retrospective study. Multivariate logistic regression models with estimation of the odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] served to analyze the influence of operation duration, gender, revision status, ASA classification, and type of fixation of the primary implant on the perioperative morbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>68.6% of the cases were primary revisions, and 31.4% secondary or multiple revisions. 49.7% of the operations involved exchange of the complete implant whereas 39.1% comprised exchange of the cup and 11.2% exchange of the stem only. Mean operation duration was 130 minutes [min] (range: 40-260 min), and mean intraoperative blood loss was 2.6 L (0.5 to 12 L). The rate of intraoperative complications was 10.1 % with a 6.5 % fracture rate. Postoperatively the complication rate was 25.4% with an 8.3% rate of luxations. 11.8% of the patients had revision within the first three weeks after surgery. Regression models showed the significant impact of revision status (primary vs. secondary or multiple: OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.42-5.92) and operation duration (per min starting from the mean operation time: OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02) on the resulting complication rate. Analysis of the perioperative complication rate following primary revisions revealed a significant difference (p = 0.03) between patients with cemented (15/36, 41.7%) and non-cemented (8/45, 17.8%) implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Revision status with a three-fold increase in patients with multiple revisions as well as operation duration with a 1 % increase per min starting from the mean operation time significantly influence the perioperative morbidity. Patients with a first revision, furthermore, seem to be at greater risk for an adverse event perioperatively if their implant is fully cemented. These findings should be taken into account prior to initiating surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":76855,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete","volume":"145 1","pages":"91-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2007-960504","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Predictive factors of perioperative morbidity in revision total hip arthroplasty].\",\"authors\":\"S Kinkel, S Kessler, T Mattes, H Reichel, W Käfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-2007-960504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The awareness and prevention of perioperative morbidity are essential in revision total hip arthroplasty [THA]. Therefore, it was the purpose of this study to assess the rate of perioperative complications following revision THA in order to evaluate the impact of patient- and procedure-related variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>169 consecutive patients with a mean age of 71.7 years suffering from aseptic loosening of their THA were included in this retrospective study. Multivariate logistic regression models with estimation of the odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] served to analyze the influence of operation duration, gender, revision status, ASA classification, and type of fixation of the primary implant on the perioperative morbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>68.6% of the cases were primary revisions, and 31.4% secondary or multiple revisions. 49.7% of the operations involved exchange of the complete implant whereas 39.1% comprised exchange of the cup and 11.2% exchange of the stem only. Mean operation duration was 130 minutes [min] (range: 40-260 min), and mean intraoperative blood loss was 2.6 L (0.5 to 12 L). The rate of intraoperative complications was 10.1 % with a 6.5 % fracture rate. Postoperatively the complication rate was 25.4% with an 8.3% rate of luxations. 11.8% of the patients had revision within the first three weeks after surgery. Regression models showed the significant impact of revision status (primary vs. secondary or multiple: OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.42-5.92) and operation duration (per min starting from the mean operation time: OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02) on the resulting complication rate. Analysis of the perioperative complication rate following primary revisions revealed a significant difference (p = 0.03) between patients with cemented (15/36, 41.7%) and non-cemented (8/45, 17.8%) implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Revision status with a three-fold increase in patients with multiple revisions as well as operation duration with a 1 % increase per min starting from the mean operation time significantly influence the perioperative morbidity. Patients with a first revision, furthermore, seem to be at greater risk for an adverse event perioperatively if their implant is fully cemented. These findings should be taken into account prior to initiating surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"91-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2007-960504\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-960504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-960504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
目的:对翻修型全髋关节置换术围手术期并发症的认识和预防至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是评估改良THA术后围手术期并发症的发生率,以评估患者和手术相关变量的影响。方法:169例平均年龄71.7岁的THA无菌性松动患者被纳入回顾性研究。采用比值比(OR)和95%可信区间(CI)的多变量logistic回归模型分析手术时间、性别、翻修状态、ASA分类、一期种植体固定类型对围手术期发病率的影响。结果:68.6%为一次修复,31.4%为二次或多次修复。49.7%的手术涉及完整种植体的交换,而39.1%的手术包括杯状体的交换,11.2%的手术只包括柄状体的交换。平均手术时间130分钟(范围40 ~ 260分钟),平均术中出血量2.6 L (0.5 ~ 12 L),术中并发症发生率10.1%,骨折发生率6.5%。术后并发症发生率为25.4%,脱位率为8.3%。11.8%的患者在术后前三周内进行了翻修。回归模型显示翻修状态(原发性与继发性或多重:or 2.90, 95% CI 1.42-5.92)和手术时间(从平均手术时间开始的每分钟:or 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02)对并发症发生率有显著影响。初次修复后围手术期并发症发生率分析显示,骨水泥种植体患者(15/36,41.7%)与非骨水泥种植体患者(8/45,17.8%)之间存在显著差异(p = 0.03)。结论:多次翻修患者翻修状态增加3倍,手术时间从平均手术时间开始每分钟增加1%,显著影响围手术期发病率。此外,第一次翻修的患者,如果他们的种植体完全胶结,围手术期不良事件的风险似乎更大。在开始手术前应考虑到这些发现。
[Predictive factors of perioperative morbidity in revision total hip arthroplasty].
Aim: The awareness and prevention of perioperative morbidity are essential in revision total hip arthroplasty [THA]. Therefore, it was the purpose of this study to assess the rate of perioperative complications following revision THA in order to evaluate the impact of patient- and procedure-related variables.
Methods: 169 consecutive patients with a mean age of 71.7 years suffering from aseptic loosening of their THA were included in this retrospective study. Multivariate logistic regression models with estimation of the odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] served to analyze the influence of operation duration, gender, revision status, ASA classification, and type of fixation of the primary implant on the perioperative morbidity.
Results: 68.6% of the cases were primary revisions, and 31.4% secondary or multiple revisions. 49.7% of the operations involved exchange of the complete implant whereas 39.1% comprised exchange of the cup and 11.2% exchange of the stem only. Mean operation duration was 130 minutes [min] (range: 40-260 min), and mean intraoperative blood loss was 2.6 L (0.5 to 12 L). The rate of intraoperative complications was 10.1 % with a 6.5 % fracture rate. Postoperatively the complication rate was 25.4% with an 8.3% rate of luxations. 11.8% of the patients had revision within the first three weeks after surgery. Regression models showed the significant impact of revision status (primary vs. secondary or multiple: OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.42-5.92) and operation duration (per min starting from the mean operation time: OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02) on the resulting complication rate. Analysis of the perioperative complication rate following primary revisions revealed a significant difference (p = 0.03) between patients with cemented (15/36, 41.7%) and non-cemented (8/45, 17.8%) implants.
Conclusions: Revision status with a three-fold increase in patients with multiple revisions as well as operation duration with a 1 % increase per min starting from the mean operation time significantly influence the perioperative morbidity. Patients with a first revision, furthermore, seem to be at greater risk for an adverse event perioperatively if their implant is fully cemented. These findings should be taken into account prior to initiating surgery.