{"title":"被遗忘者的命运:重新审视张伯伦的作品。","authors":"Jaan Valsiner","doi":"10.1007/BF02915217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article discusses the early psychological traditions developed at Clark University under the guidance of G. Stanley Hall. Anthropology and cultural psychology are both rooted in the notion that humans are social beings. That idea constituted a brief moment of theoretical unity between psychology and anthropology in the study of human language in its psychological functions. In that context, the work of Alexander Chamberlain is explored as a major contribution. Chamberlain--if viewed in the jargon of our contemporary social scientists--was deeply \"interdisciplinary\" in his work. Despite the positive meaning of the term \"interdisciplinary\" in contemporary discourse about the social sciences, the realities of social organization of any science entail separation rather than integration. Chamberlain's work took place in parallel in anthropology and in developmental psychology under the interdisciplinary emphasis of \"child study\" as set up by G. Stanley Hall. Hall made child study the distinctive feature of the \"Clark tradition\" of psychology. Chamberlain's work constituted both the beginning and the end of the (miniscule) \"Clark tradition\" in anthropology.</p>","PeriodicalId":73397,"journal":{"name":"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society","volume":" ","pages":"218-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02915217","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The fate of the forgotten: Chamberlain's work reconsidered.\",\"authors\":\"Jaan Valsiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF02915217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article discusses the early psychological traditions developed at Clark University under the guidance of G. Stanley Hall. Anthropology and cultural psychology are both rooted in the notion that humans are social beings. That idea constituted a brief moment of theoretical unity between psychology and anthropology in the study of human language in its psychological functions. In that context, the work of Alexander Chamberlain is explored as a major contribution. Chamberlain--if viewed in the jargon of our contemporary social scientists--was deeply \\\"interdisciplinary\\\" in his work. Despite the positive meaning of the term \\\"interdisciplinary\\\" in contemporary discourse about the social sciences, the realities of social organization of any science entail separation rather than integration. Chamberlain's work took place in parallel in anthropology and in developmental psychology under the interdisciplinary emphasis of \\\"child study\\\" as set up by G. Stanley Hall. Hall made child study the distinctive feature of the \\\"Clark tradition\\\" of psychology. Chamberlain's work constituted both the beginning and the end of the (miniscule) \\\"Clark tradition\\\" in anthropology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"218-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02915217\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文讨论了克拉克大学在G. Stanley Hall的指导下发展起来的早期心理学传统。人类学和文化心理学都植根于人类是社会存在的观念。这一观点使心理学和人类学在研究人类语言的心理功能方面实现了短暂的理论统一。在这种背景下,亚历山大·张伯伦的工作被认为是一个主要的贡献。张伯伦——如果用我们当代社会科学家的行话来说——在他的工作中有着深刻的“跨学科”。尽管“跨学科”一词在当代关于社会科学的话语中具有积极意义,但任何科学的社会组织的现实都需要分离而不是整合。张伯伦的工作同时发生在人类学和发展心理学领域,在G. Stanley Hall建立的“儿童研究”的跨学科强调下。霍尔让孩子学习心理学的“克拉克传统”的鲜明特征。张伯伦的作品构成了(微小的)人类学中的"克拉克传统"
The fate of the forgotten: Chamberlain's work reconsidered.
This article discusses the early psychological traditions developed at Clark University under the guidance of G. Stanley Hall. Anthropology and cultural psychology are both rooted in the notion that humans are social beings. That idea constituted a brief moment of theoretical unity between psychology and anthropology in the study of human language in its psychological functions. In that context, the work of Alexander Chamberlain is explored as a major contribution. Chamberlain--if viewed in the jargon of our contemporary social scientists--was deeply "interdisciplinary" in his work. Despite the positive meaning of the term "interdisciplinary" in contemporary discourse about the social sciences, the realities of social organization of any science entail separation rather than integration. Chamberlain's work took place in parallel in anthropology and in developmental psychology under the interdisciplinary emphasis of "child study" as set up by G. Stanley Hall. Hall made child study the distinctive feature of the "Clark tradition" of psychology. Chamberlain's work constituted both the beginning and the end of the (miniscule) "Clark tradition" in anthropology.