被遗忘者的命运:重新审视张伯伦的作品。

Jaan Valsiner
{"title":"被遗忘者的命运:重新审视张伯伦的作品。","authors":"Jaan Valsiner","doi":"10.1007/BF02915217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article discusses the early psychological traditions developed at Clark University under the guidance of G. Stanley Hall. Anthropology and cultural psychology are both rooted in the notion that humans are social beings. That idea constituted a brief moment of theoretical unity between psychology and anthropology in the study of human language in its psychological functions. In that context, the work of Alexander Chamberlain is explored as a major contribution. Chamberlain--if viewed in the jargon of our contemporary social scientists--was deeply \"interdisciplinary\" in his work. Despite the positive meaning of the term \"interdisciplinary\" in contemporary discourse about the social sciences, the realities of social organization of any science entail separation rather than integration. Chamberlain's work took place in parallel in anthropology and in developmental psychology under the interdisciplinary emphasis of \"child study\" as set up by G. Stanley Hall. Hall made child study the distinctive feature of the \"Clark tradition\" of psychology. Chamberlain's work constituted both the beginning and the end of the (miniscule) \"Clark tradition\" in anthropology.</p>","PeriodicalId":73397,"journal":{"name":"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society","volume":" ","pages":"218-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02915217","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The fate of the forgotten: Chamberlain's work reconsidered.\",\"authors\":\"Jaan Valsiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF02915217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article discusses the early psychological traditions developed at Clark University under the guidance of G. Stanley Hall. Anthropology and cultural psychology are both rooted in the notion that humans are social beings. That idea constituted a brief moment of theoretical unity between psychology and anthropology in the study of human language in its psychological functions. In that context, the work of Alexander Chamberlain is explored as a major contribution. Chamberlain--if viewed in the jargon of our contemporary social scientists--was deeply \\\"interdisciplinary\\\" in his work. Despite the positive meaning of the term \\\"interdisciplinary\\\" in contemporary discourse about the social sciences, the realities of social organization of any science entail separation rather than integration. Chamberlain's work took place in parallel in anthropology and in developmental psychology under the interdisciplinary emphasis of \\\"child study\\\" as set up by G. Stanley Hall. Hall made child study the distinctive feature of the \\\"Clark tradition\\\" of psychology. Chamberlain's work constituted both the beginning and the end of the (miniscule) \\\"Clark tradition\\\" in anthropology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"218-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02915217\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文讨论了克拉克大学在G. Stanley Hall的指导下发展起来的早期心理学传统。人类学和文化心理学都植根于人类是社会存在的观念。这一观点使心理学和人类学在研究人类语言的心理功能方面实现了短暂的理论统一。在这种背景下,亚历山大·张伯伦的工作被认为是一个主要的贡献。张伯伦——如果用我们当代社会科学家的行话来说——在他的工作中有着深刻的“跨学科”。尽管“跨学科”一词在当代关于社会科学的话语中具有积极意义,但任何科学的社会组织的现实都需要分离而不是整合。张伯伦的工作同时发生在人类学和发展心理学领域,在G. Stanley Hall建立的“儿童研究”的跨学科强调下。霍尔让孩子学习心理学的“克拉克传统”的鲜明特征。张伯伦的作品构成了(微小的)人类学中的"克拉克传统"
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The fate of the forgotten: Chamberlain's work reconsidered.

This article discusses the early psychological traditions developed at Clark University under the guidance of G. Stanley Hall. Anthropology and cultural psychology are both rooted in the notion that humans are social beings. That idea constituted a brief moment of theoretical unity between psychology and anthropology in the study of human language in its psychological functions. In that context, the work of Alexander Chamberlain is explored as a major contribution. Chamberlain--if viewed in the jargon of our contemporary social scientists--was deeply "interdisciplinary" in his work. Despite the positive meaning of the term "interdisciplinary" in contemporary discourse about the social sciences, the realities of social organization of any science entail separation rather than integration. Chamberlain's work took place in parallel in anthropology and in developmental psychology under the interdisciplinary emphasis of "child study" as set up by G. Stanley Hall. Hall made child study the distinctive feature of the "Clark tradition" of psychology. Chamberlain's work constituted both the beginning and the end of the (miniscule) "Clark tradition" in anthropology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editor’s note Editorial comment Editorial comment Editorial commentary Culture-brain interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1