五种测定血浆总蛋白浓度方法的比较

Burcu Okutucu, Ayşşe Dınçer, Ömer Habib, Figen Zıhnıoglu
{"title":"五种测定血浆总蛋白浓度方法的比较","authors":"Burcu Okutucu,&nbsp;Ayşşe Dınçer,&nbsp;Ömer Habib,&nbsp;Figen Zıhnıoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Quantitation of exact total protein content is often a key step and is common to many applications in general biochemistry research and routine clinical laboratory practice. Before embarking on any type of protein analysis, particularly comparative techniques, it is important to accurately quantitate the amount of protein in the sample. In order to assess the quality of total protein estimation results, five methods were tested and were applied to the same pooled plasma sample. For this aim, Bradford (Coomassie Brilliant Blue), Lowry (Folin–Ciocalteau), Biüret, Pesce and Strande (Ponceau–S/TCA), and modified method of Schaffner–Weismann (Amido Black 10B) were used. The last two methods employ simultaneous precipitation of proteins with the acid containing dye solutions followed by dissolution of precipitate in a NaOH solution. It is shown that each assay has advantages and disadvantages relative to sensitivity, ease of performance, acceptance in literature, accuracy and reproducibility/coefficient of variation. All of the methods tested show a CV %</span> <!-->&lt;<!--> <span>6. Besides pooled plasma, a known concentration of human serum albumin was also analyzed and discussed by means of standardization of plasma total protein content.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":15257,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.05.009","citationCount":"139","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of five methods for determination of total plasma protein concentration\",\"authors\":\"Burcu Okutucu,&nbsp;Ayşşe Dınçer,&nbsp;Ömer Habib,&nbsp;Figen Zıhnıoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.05.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Quantitation of exact total protein content is often a key step and is common to many applications in general biochemistry research and routine clinical laboratory practice. Before embarking on any type of protein analysis, particularly comparative techniques, it is important to accurately quantitate the amount of protein in the sample. In order to assess the quality of total protein estimation results, five methods were tested and were applied to the same pooled plasma sample. For this aim, Bradford (Coomassie Brilliant Blue), Lowry (Folin–Ciocalteau), Biüret, Pesce and Strande (Ponceau–S/TCA), and modified method of Schaffner–Weismann (Amido Black 10B) were used. The last two methods employ simultaneous precipitation of proteins with the acid containing dye solutions followed by dissolution of precipitate in a NaOH solution. It is shown that each assay has advantages and disadvantages relative to sensitivity, ease of performance, acceptance in literature, accuracy and reproducibility/coefficient of variation. All of the methods tested show a CV %</span> <!-->&lt;<!--> <span>6. Besides pooled plasma, a known concentration of human serum albumin was also analyzed and discussed by means of standardization of plasma total protein content.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.05.009\",\"citationCount\":\"139\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165022X07001145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165022X07001145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 139

摘要

准确的总蛋白含量的定量通常是关键步骤,在一般生物化学研究和常规临床实验室实践的许多应用中都是常见的。在进行任何类型的蛋白质分析,特别是比较技术之前,准确定量样品中的蛋白质量是很重要的。为了评估总蛋白估计结果的质量,我们测试了五种方法,并应用于相同的血浆样本。为此,采用Bradford (Coomassie Brilliant Blue)、Lowry (Folin-Ciocalteau)、bi ret、Pesce和Strande (Ponceau-S /TCA)和改进的Schaffner-Weismann (Amido Black 10B)方法。最后两种方法采用同时沉淀蛋白质与含酸染料溶液,然后溶解沉淀在NaOH溶液。结果表明,每种检测方法在灵敏度、易执行性、文献接受度、准确性和可重复性/变异系数方面都有优缺点。所有测试的方法都显示CV % <6. 除了汇集血浆外,还通过血浆总蛋白含量的标准化分析和讨论了已知的人血清白蛋白浓度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of five methods for determination of total plasma protein concentration

Quantitation of exact total protein content is often a key step and is common to many applications in general biochemistry research and routine clinical laboratory practice. Before embarking on any type of protein analysis, particularly comparative techniques, it is important to accurately quantitate the amount of protein in the sample. In order to assess the quality of total protein estimation results, five methods were tested and were applied to the same pooled plasma sample. For this aim, Bradford (Coomassie Brilliant Blue), Lowry (Folin–Ciocalteau), Biüret, Pesce and Strande (Ponceau–S/TCA), and modified method of Schaffner–Weismann (Amido Black 10B) were used. The last two methods employ simultaneous precipitation of proteins with the acid containing dye solutions followed by dissolution of precipitate in a NaOH solution. It is shown that each assay has advantages and disadvantages relative to sensitivity, ease of performance, acceptance in literature, accuracy and reproducibility/coefficient of variation. All of the methods tested show a CV % < 6. Besides pooled plasma, a known concentration of human serum albumin was also analyzed and discussed by means of standardization of plasma total protein content.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Fluorescent method for detection of cleaved collagens using O-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) A rapid and non leaky way for preparation of the sharp intracellular recording microelectrodes Quantification of penicillin G during labor and delivery by capillary electrophoresis Dispensing an enzyme-conjugated solution into an ELISA plate by adapting ink-jet printers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1