Effects of glibenclamide, glimepiride, and gliclazide on ischemic preconditioning in rat heart.

Objective: To compare the influence of different sulfonylureas on the myocardial protection effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in isolated rat hearts, and ATP-sensitive potassium channel current (IK(ATP)) of rat ventricular myocytes.

Methods: Isolated Langendorff perfused rat hearts were randomly assigned to five groups: (1) control group, (2) IPC group, (3) IPC + glibenclamide (GLB, 10 micromol/L) group, (4) IPC + glimepiride (GLM, 10 micromol/L) group, (5) IPC + gliclazide (GLC, 50 micromol/L) group. IPC was defined as 3 cycles of 5-minute zero-flow global ischemia followed by 5-minute reperfusion. The haemodynamic parameters and the infarct size of each isolated heart were recorded. And the sarcolemmal IK(ATP) of dissociated ventricular myocytes reperfused with 10 micromol/L GLB, 1 micromol/L GLM, and 1 micromol/L GLC was recorded with single-pipette whole-cell voltage clamp under simulated ischemic condition.

Results: The infarct sizes of rat hearts in IPC (23.7% +/- 1.3%), IPC + GLM (24.6% +/- 1.0%), and IPC + GLC (33.1% +/- 1.3%) groups were all significantly smaller than that in control group (43.3% +/- 1.8%; P < 0.01, n = 6). The infarct size of rat hearts in IPC + GLB group (40.4% +/- 1.4%) was significantly larger than that in IPC group (P < 0.01, n=6). Under simulated ischemic condition, GLB (10 micromol/L) decreased IK(ATP) from 20.65 +/- 7.80 to 9.09 +/- 0.10 pA/pF (P < 0.01, n=6), GLM (1 micromol/L) did not significantly inhibit IK(ATP) (n=6), and GLC (1 micromol/L) decreased IK(ATP) from 16.73 +/- 0.97 to 11. 18 +/- 3.56 pA/pF (P < 0.05, n=6).

Conclusions: GLM has less effect on myocardial protection of IPC than GLB and GLC. Blockage of sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive potassium channels in myocardium might play an important role in diminishing IPC-induced protection of GLM, GLB, and GLC.