水泥烧伤:都柏林国家烧伤单位的经验。

Journal of burns and wounds Pub Date : 2007-10-24
Munir Alam, M Moynagh, C Lawlor
{"title":"水泥烧伤:都柏林国家烧伤单位的经验。","authors":"Munir Alam,&nbsp;M Moynagh,&nbsp;C Lawlor","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cement burns account for relatively few admissions to a burn unit; however, these burns deserve separate consideration because of special features of diagnosis and management. Cement burns, even though potentially disabling, have rarely been reported in literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed of all patients admitted with cement burns injuries to the national burns unit at the St James's Hospital in Dublin, Ireland, over a 10-year period for the years 1996-2005.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 patients with cement burns were admitted. The majority of patients were aged 16-74 years (mean age = 32 years). Eighty-seven percent of injuries occurred in an industrial and 13% in a domestic setting. The upper and lower extremities were involved in all the patients, and the mean total body surface area affected was 6.5%. The mean length of hospital stay was 21 days with a range of 1-40 days. Thirty-eight (82%) were surgically managed involving debridement and split-thickness skin graft (SSG) and four (9%) were conservatively managed. A further four did not have data available.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Widespread inexperience in dealing with this group of cement burns patients and delays in referral to burns unit highlights the potential for greater levels of general awareness and knowledge in both prevention and treatment of these burns. As well, early debridement and split-thickness skin grafting at diagnosis constitutes the best means of reducing the high socioeconomic costs and allows for early return to work.</p>","PeriodicalId":87438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of burns and wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2064966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cement burns: the dublin national burns unit experience.\",\"authors\":\"Munir Alam,&nbsp;M Moynagh,&nbsp;C Lawlor\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cement burns account for relatively few admissions to a burn unit; however, these burns deserve separate consideration because of special features of diagnosis and management. Cement burns, even though potentially disabling, have rarely been reported in literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed of all patients admitted with cement burns injuries to the national burns unit at the St James's Hospital in Dublin, Ireland, over a 10-year period for the years 1996-2005.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 patients with cement burns were admitted. The majority of patients were aged 16-74 years (mean age = 32 years). Eighty-seven percent of injuries occurred in an industrial and 13% in a domestic setting. The upper and lower extremities were involved in all the patients, and the mean total body surface area affected was 6.5%. The mean length of hospital stay was 21 days with a range of 1-40 days. Thirty-eight (82%) were surgically managed involving debridement and split-thickness skin graft (SSG) and four (9%) were conservatively managed. A further four did not have data available.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Widespread inexperience in dealing with this group of cement burns patients and delays in referral to burns unit highlights the potential for greater levels of general awareness and knowledge in both prevention and treatment of these burns. As well, early debridement and split-thickness skin grafting at diagnosis constitutes the best means of reducing the high socioeconomic costs and allows for early return to work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of burns and wounds\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2064966/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of burns and wounds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of burns and wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:水泥烧伤在烧伤科的入院人数相对较少;然而,由于诊断和治疗的特殊特点,这些烧伤值得单独考虑。水泥烧伤,即使可能致残,也很少有文献报道。方法:回顾性分析1996-2005年10年间爱尔兰都柏林圣詹姆斯医院国家烧伤科收治的所有水泥烧伤患者。结果:共收治46例水泥烧伤患者。大多数患者年龄16-74岁(平均年龄32岁)。87%的伤害发生在工业场所,13%发生在家庭场所。所有患者均累及上肢和下肢,平均总体表面积为6.5%。平均住院时间21天,范围1 ~ 40天。38例(82%)采用手术治疗,包括清创和裂厚皮肤移植(SSG), 4例(9%)采用保守治疗。另外四个国家没有可用的数据。结论:在处理这组水泥烧伤患者方面普遍缺乏经验和转诊到烧伤部门的延误,突出了在预防和治疗这类烧伤方面提高普遍认识和知识水平的潜力。此外,诊断时早期清创和裂厚皮肤移植是降低高社会经济成本和允许早期重返工作岗位的最佳手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cement burns: the dublin national burns unit experience.

Objective: Cement burns account for relatively few admissions to a burn unit; however, these burns deserve separate consideration because of special features of diagnosis and management. Cement burns, even though potentially disabling, have rarely been reported in literature.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients admitted with cement burns injuries to the national burns unit at the St James's Hospital in Dublin, Ireland, over a 10-year period for the years 1996-2005.

Results: A total of 46 patients with cement burns were admitted. The majority of patients were aged 16-74 years (mean age = 32 years). Eighty-seven percent of injuries occurred in an industrial and 13% in a domestic setting. The upper and lower extremities were involved in all the patients, and the mean total body surface area affected was 6.5%. The mean length of hospital stay was 21 days with a range of 1-40 days. Thirty-eight (82%) were surgically managed involving debridement and split-thickness skin graft (SSG) and four (9%) were conservatively managed. A further four did not have data available.

Conclusion: Widespread inexperience in dealing with this group of cement burns patients and delays in referral to burns unit highlights the potential for greater levels of general awareness and knowledge in both prevention and treatment of these burns. As well, early debridement and split-thickness skin grafting at diagnosis constitutes the best means of reducing the high socioeconomic costs and allows for early return to work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The increasing problem of wound bacterial burden and infection in acute and chronic soft-tissue wounds caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Human keratinocytes cultured on collagen matrix used as an experimental burn model. Sulfur mustard toxicity following dermal exposure: role of oxidative stress, and antioxidant therapy. Cement burns: the dublin national burns unit experience. Amnion-derived multipotent progenitor cells increase gain of incisional breaking strength and decrease incidence and severity of acute wound failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1