儿童乘客排在后面吗?司机和儿童乘客受伤风险差异改善的证据。

Flaura K Winston, Dawei Xie, Dennis R Durbin, Michael R Elliott
{"title":"儿童乘客排在后面吗?司机和儿童乘客受伤风险差异改善的证据。","authors":"Flaura K Winston,&nbsp;Dawei Xie,&nbsp;Dennis R Durbin,&nbsp;Michael R Elliott","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since nearly half of children fatally injured in automobile crashes were restrained, optimizing occupant protection systems for children is essential to reducing morbidity and mortality. Data from the Partners for Child Passenger Safety study were used to compare the differential injury risk between drivers and their child passengers in the same crash, with a focus on vehicle model year. A matched cohort design and conditional logistic regression model were used in the analyses. Overall, injury risk for drivers was higher than for children, but the risk difference was largest for the oldest model year vehicles, particularly for children aged 4-8 in seat belts. While drivers experienced significant benefits in safety with increasing model years, children restrained by safety belts alone derived less safety benefit from newer vehicles.</p>","PeriodicalId":80490,"journal":{"name":"Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine","volume":"51 ","pages":"113-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217508/pdf/aam51_p113.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are child passengers bringing up the rear? Evidence for differential improvements in injury risk between drivers and their child passengers.\",\"authors\":\"Flaura K Winston,&nbsp;Dawei Xie,&nbsp;Dennis R Durbin,&nbsp;Michael R Elliott\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since nearly half of children fatally injured in automobile crashes were restrained, optimizing occupant protection systems for children is essential to reducing morbidity and mortality. Data from the Partners for Child Passenger Safety study were used to compare the differential injury risk between drivers and their child passengers in the same crash, with a focus on vehicle model year. A matched cohort design and conditional logistic regression model were used in the analyses. Overall, injury risk for drivers was higher than for children, but the risk difference was largest for the oldest model year vehicles, particularly for children aged 4-8 in seat belts. While drivers experienced significant benefits in safety with increasing model years, children restrained by safety belts alone derived less safety benefit from newer vehicles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"113-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217508/pdf/aam51_p113.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于近一半在汽车碰撞中致命受伤的儿童受到约束,因此优化儿童乘员保护系统对于降低发病率和死亡率至关重要。来自儿童乘客安全合作伙伴研究的数据被用来比较驾驶员和儿童乘客在同一次碰撞中受伤风险的差异,重点是车辆型号。采用匹配队列设计和条件logistic回归模型进行分析。总的来说,驾驶员的受伤风险高于儿童,但最老的车型的风险差异最大,尤其是4-8岁的儿童。虽然随着车型年限的增加,驾驶员在安全方面得到了显著的好处,但仅用安全带约束的儿童从新车型中获得的安全好处较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are child passengers bringing up the rear? Evidence for differential improvements in injury risk between drivers and their child passengers.

Since nearly half of children fatally injured in automobile crashes were restrained, optimizing occupant protection systems for children is essential to reducing morbidity and mortality. Data from the Partners for Child Passenger Safety study were used to compare the differential injury risk between drivers and their child passengers in the same crash, with a focus on vehicle model year. A matched cohort design and conditional logistic regression model were used in the analyses. Overall, injury risk for drivers was higher than for children, but the risk difference was largest for the oldest model year vehicles, particularly for children aged 4-8 in seat belts. While drivers experienced significant benefits in safety with increasing model years, children restrained by safety belts alone derived less safety benefit from newer vehicles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Other high-risk factors for young drivers - how graduated licensing does, doesn't or could address them. Characteristics on fractures of tibia and fibula in car impacts to pedestrians and bicyclists - influences of car bumper height and shape. The impacts of functional performance, behaviour and traffic exposure on road-crossing judgements of young children. The association between age, injury, and survival to hospital among a cohort of injured motorcyclists. Are child passengers bringing up the rear? Evidence for differential improvements in injury risk between drivers and their child passengers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1