慢性下腰痛的再训练是否需要每天等速躯干肌肉的加强?

N. Olivier , A. Lepretre , I. Caby , M.A. Dupuis , F. Prieur
{"title":"慢性下腰痛的再训练是否需要每天等速躯干肌肉的加强?","authors":"N. Olivier ,&nbsp;A. Lepretre ,&nbsp;I. Caby ,&nbsp;M.A. Dupuis ,&nbsp;F. Prieur","doi":"10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of this study was to determine the benefits of a functional retraining programme (with or without daily isokinetic reinforcement of the trunk muscles) in patients with lower-back pain.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Two groups of 30 patients took part in the study. The control group (CG) underwent a four-week reconditioning program in a day hospital, whereas a second interventional group (IG) additionally performed daily isokinetic training of the trunk muscles. Three evaluations were carried out: before hospitalization (<em>T</em><sub>1</sub>), immediately after hospitalization (<em>T</em><sub>2</sub>) and three months postrehabilitation (<em>T</em><sub>3</sub>).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed an improvement in each parameter after rehabilitation, regardless of the group. A decrease in the DALLAS scores revealed a reduced impact of lower-back pain on the patients’ lives. Pain experienced fell by 24%, analgesic treatment was significantly decreased (CG: −<!--> <!-->53%; IG: −<!--> <!-->56%), muscle endurance was improved (quadriceps: +<!--> <!-->30%, abdominal muscles: +<!--> <!-->20%, paraspinal muscles: +<!--> <!-->23%, quadratus lumborum: +<!--> <!-->33%) and the patients were more supple, as revealed by a decrease in the finger-to-ground distance (at <em>T</em><sub>1</sub>, CG: 12.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.1<!--> <!-->cm; IG: 13.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.5<!--> <!-->cm at <em>T</em><sub>1</sub>; CG: 2.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.4<!--> <!-->cm; IG: 2.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.1<!--> <!-->cm at <em>T</em><sub>2</sub>). The sole difference for CG and IG at <em>T</em><sub>2</sub> resulted from an improvement in the performance of the trunk extensor muscles, which was significantly greater in the IG (CG: +<!--> <!-->14%; IG: +<!--> <!-->20%). Three months after rehabilitation, the benefits were still present for the two groups and, indeed, were even greater for certain parameters.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Regardless of the protocol, the patients improved in both physical and psychological terms and these improvements were maintained over a short period, at least. Our results confirmed that one functional recovery programme is not superior to another for patients with lower-back pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72206,"journal":{"name":"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.02.003","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le réentraînement à l’effort de la lombalgie chronique nécessite-t-il un renforcement musculaire isocinétique quotidien du tronc ?\",\"authors\":\"N. Olivier ,&nbsp;A. Lepretre ,&nbsp;I. Caby ,&nbsp;M.A. Dupuis ,&nbsp;F. Prieur\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of this study was to determine the benefits of a functional retraining programme (with or without daily isokinetic reinforcement of the trunk muscles) in patients with lower-back pain.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Two groups of 30 patients took part in the study. The control group (CG) underwent a four-week reconditioning program in a day hospital, whereas a second interventional group (IG) additionally performed daily isokinetic training of the trunk muscles. Three evaluations were carried out: before hospitalization (<em>T</em><sub>1</sub>), immediately after hospitalization (<em>T</em><sub>2</sub>) and three months postrehabilitation (<em>T</em><sub>3</sub>).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed an improvement in each parameter after rehabilitation, regardless of the group. A decrease in the DALLAS scores revealed a reduced impact of lower-back pain on the patients’ lives. Pain experienced fell by 24%, analgesic treatment was significantly decreased (CG: −<!--> <!-->53%; IG: −<!--> <!-->56%), muscle endurance was improved (quadriceps: +<!--> <!-->30%, abdominal muscles: +<!--> <!-->20%, paraspinal muscles: +<!--> <!-->23%, quadratus lumborum: +<!--> <!-->33%) and the patients were more supple, as revealed by a decrease in the finger-to-ground distance (at <em>T</em><sub>1</sub>, CG: 12.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.1<!--> <!-->cm; IG: 13.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.5<!--> <!-->cm at <em>T</em><sub>1</sub>; CG: 2.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.4<!--> <!-->cm; IG: 2.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.1<!--> <!-->cm at <em>T</em><sub>2</sub>). The sole difference for CG and IG at <em>T</em><sub>2</sub> resulted from an improvement in the performance of the trunk extensor muscles, which was significantly greater in the IG (CG: +<!--> <!-->14%; IG: +<!--> <!-->20%). Three months after rehabilitation, the benefits were still present for the two groups and, indeed, were even greater for certain parameters.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Regardless of the protocol, the patients improved in both physical and psychological terms and these improvements were maintained over a short period, at least. Our results confirmed that one functional recovery programme is not superior to another for patients with lower-back pain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.02.003\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168605408000408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168605408000408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的本研究的目的是确定功能性再训练计划(有或没有躯干肌肉每日等速强化)对腰痛患者的益处。方法分为两组,每组30例。对照组(CG)在日间医院接受了为期四周的修复计划,而第二干预组(IG)则每天进行躯干肌肉的等速训练。分别进行住院前(T1)、住院后(T2)和康复后3个月(T3) 3项评估。结果康复后各组患者各项指标均有改善。达拉斯评分的下降表明腰痛对患者生活的影响减少了。疼痛经历下降24%,镇痛治疗显著减少(CG:−53%;IG:−56%),肌肉耐力得到改善(股四头肌:+ 30%,腹肌:+ 20%,棘旁肌:+ 23%,腰方肌:+ 33%),患者柔韧性增强,表现为手指到地距离减少(T1时,CG: 12.9±6.1 cm;IG: T1时13.6±5.5 cm;CG: 2.2±5.4 cm;IG: 2.8±5.1 cm (T2)。在T2时,CG和IG的唯一差异是躯干伸肌性能的改善,在IG时显著提高(CG: + 14%;Ig: + 20%)。康复三个月后,两组患者的益处仍然存在,而且在某些参数上甚至更大。结论无论采用何种治疗方案,患者在生理和心理方面都得到了改善,并且这些改善至少在短期内得以维持。我们的结果证实,对于腰痛患者,一种功能恢复方案并不优于另一种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Le réentraînement à l’effort de la lombalgie chronique nécessite-t-il un renforcement musculaire isocinétique quotidien du tronc ?

Objective

The goal of this study was to determine the benefits of a functional retraining programme (with or without daily isokinetic reinforcement of the trunk muscles) in patients with lower-back pain.

Method

Two groups of 30 patients took part in the study. The control group (CG) underwent a four-week reconditioning program in a day hospital, whereas a second interventional group (IG) additionally performed daily isokinetic training of the trunk muscles. Three evaluations were carried out: before hospitalization (T1), immediately after hospitalization (T2) and three months postrehabilitation (T3).

Results

We observed an improvement in each parameter after rehabilitation, regardless of the group. A decrease in the DALLAS scores revealed a reduced impact of lower-back pain on the patients’ lives. Pain experienced fell by 24%, analgesic treatment was significantly decreased (CG: − 53%; IG: − 56%), muscle endurance was improved (quadriceps: + 30%, abdominal muscles: + 20%, paraspinal muscles: + 23%, quadratus lumborum: + 33%) and the patients were more supple, as revealed by a decrease in the finger-to-ground distance (at T1, CG: 12.9 ± 6.1 cm; IG: 13.6 ± 5.5 cm at T1; CG: 2.2 ± 5.4 cm; IG: 2.8 ± 5.1 cm at T2). The sole difference for CG and IG at T2 resulted from an improvement in the performance of the trunk extensor muscles, which was significantly greater in the IG (CG: + 14%; IG: + 20%). Three months after rehabilitation, the benefits were still present for the two groups and, indeed, were even greater for certain parameters.

Conclusion

Regardless of the protocol, the patients improved in both physical and psychological terms and these improvements were maintained over a short period, at least. Our results confirmed that one functional recovery programme is not superior to another for patients with lower-back pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Le devenir fonctionnel et la qualité de vie des ruptures de la coiffe des rotateurs non opérées Apport de l’arthrodistension dans la prise en charge de la capsulite rétractile primitive de l’épaule : étude comparative versus rééducation Arthropathie neurogène de la charnière lombosacrée chez un paraplégique : à propos d’un cas European physical and rehabilitation medicine journals in concert: A European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ESPRM) initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1