兰索拉唑和奥美拉唑在剂型和生物液中的交变极谱行为和测定

N. EL-Enany , F. Belal , M. Rizk
{"title":"兰索拉唑和奥美拉唑在剂型和生物液中的交变极谱行为和测定","authors":"N. EL-Enany ,&nbsp;F. Belal ,&nbsp;M. Rizk","doi":"10.1016/j.jprot.2008.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The alternating current (AC<sub>t</sub>) polarographic behavior of lansoprazole (LNS) and omeprazole (OMP) was studied in Britton Robinson buffers (BRb) over the pH range 4.1–11.5. In BRb of pH 9.6 and 10.5, well-defined AC<sub>t</sub> peaks were obtained for both LNS and OMP, respectively. The current–concentration plots were rectilinear over the ranges of 0.4–20 µg mL<sup>−<!--> <!-->1</sup> and 0.2–10 µg mL<sup>−<!--> <!-->1</sup> for LNS and OMP respectively. The minimum detection limits (<em>S</em>/<em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2) were 0.02 µg mL<sup>−<!--> <!-->1</sup> (5.4<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->10<sup>−<!--> <!-->8</sup> M) and 0.01 µg mL<sup>−<!--> <!-->1</sup> (2.9<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->10<sup>−<!--> <!-->8</sup> M) for LNS and OMP, respectively. The proposed method was successfully applied to the analysis of the two drugs in their commercial capsules. The average percent recoveries were favorably compared to those obtained by reference methods. Co-administered drugs such as naproxen and methotrexate did not interfere with the proposed method. The proposed method was further extended to the <em>in-vitro</em> determination of the lansoprazole in spiked plasma, the percentage recoveries was 98.47<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.29 (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->4). The pathway for the electrode reaction for both drugs involved reduction of the sulphonyl group into the corresponding thiol group at the Dropping Mercury Electrode. The advantages of the method were time saving and more sensitive than the other published voltammetric method. Yet The present study is the first report on the use of alterating current polarography (AC<sub>t</sub>) in this respect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15257,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods","volume":"70 6","pages":"Pages 889-896"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jprot.2008.02.002","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The alternating current polarographic behavior and determination of lansoprazole and omeprazole in dosage forms and biological fluids\",\"authors\":\"N. EL-Enany ,&nbsp;F. Belal ,&nbsp;M. Rizk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jprot.2008.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The alternating current (AC<sub>t</sub>) polarographic behavior of lansoprazole (LNS) and omeprazole (OMP) was studied in Britton Robinson buffers (BRb) over the pH range 4.1–11.5. In BRb of pH 9.6 and 10.5, well-defined AC<sub>t</sub> peaks were obtained for both LNS and OMP, respectively. The current–concentration plots were rectilinear over the ranges of 0.4–20 µg mL<sup>−<!--> <!-->1</sup> and 0.2–10 µg mL<sup>−<!--> <!-->1</sup> for LNS and OMP respectively. The minimum detection limits (<em>S</em>/<em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2) were 0.02 µg mL<sup>−<!--> <!-->1</sup> (5.4<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->10<sup>−<!--> <!-->8</sup> M) and 0.01 µg mL<sup>−<!--> <!-->1</sup> (2.9<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->10<sup>−<!--> <!-->8</sup> M) for LNS and OMP, respectively. The proposed method was successfully applied to the analysis of the two drugs in their commercial capsules. The average percent recoveries were favorably compared to those obtained by reference methods. Co-administered drugs such as naproxen and methotrexate did not interfere with the proposed method. The proposed method was further extended to the <em>in-vitro</em> determination of the lansoprazole in spiked plasma, the percentage recoveries was 98.47<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.29 (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->4). The pathway for the electrode reaction for both drugs involved reduction of the sulphonyl group into the corresponding thiol group at the Dropping Mercury Electrode. The advantages of the method were time saving and more sensitive than the other published voltammetric method. Yet The present study is the first report on the use of alterating current polarography (AC<sub>t</sub>) in this respect.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods\",\"volume\":\"70 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 889-896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jprot.2008.02.002\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165022X07002060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165022X07002060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

研究了兰索拉唑(LNS)和奥美拉唑(OMP)在pH为4.1 ~ 11.5的Britton Robinson缓冲液(BRb)中的交流电极谱行为。在pH为9.6和10.5的BRb中,LNS和OMP分别获得了明确的ACt峰。LNS和OMP的电流浓度曲线在0.4 ~ 20µg mL−1和0.2 ~ 10µg mL−1范围内呈直线关系。对LNS和OMP的最低检出限(S/N = 2)分别为0.02µg mL−1 (5.4 × 10−8 M)和0.01µg mL−1 (2.9 × 10−8 M)。该方法成功地应用于这两种药物的商业胶囊的分析。与参考方法相比,平均回收率较好。联合使用萘普生和甲氨蝶呤等药物不会干扰所提出的方法。将该方法进一步推广到加标血浆中兰索拉唑的体外测定,回收率为98.47±1.29 (n = 4)。两种药物的电极反应途径都是在降汞电极上将磺胺基还原为相应的巯基。该方法比其他已发表的伏安法具有省时和灵敏度高的优点。然而,本研究是在这方面使用变电流极谱法(ACt)的第一份报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The alternating current polarographic behavior and determination of lansoprazole and omeprazole in dosage forms and biological fluids

The alternating current (ACt) polarographic behavior of lansoprazole (LNS) and omeprazole (OMP) was studied in Britton Robinson buffers (BRb) over the pH range 4.1–11.5. In BRb of pH 9.6 and 10.5, well-defined ACt peaks were obtained for both LNS and OMP, respectively. The current–concentration plots were rectilinear over the ranges of 0.4–20 µg mL 1 and 0.2–10 µg mL 1 for LNS and OMP respectively. The minimum detection limits (S/N = 2) were 0.02 µg mL 1 (5.4 × 10 8 M) and 0.01 µg mL 1 (2.9 × 10 8 M) for LNS and OMP, respectively. The proposed method was successfully applied to the analysis of the two drugs in their commercial capsules. The average percent recoveries were favorably compared to those obtained by reference methods. Co-administered drugs such as naproxen and methotrexate did not interfere with the proposed method. The proposed method was further extended to the in-vitro determination of the lansoprazole in spiked plasma, the percentage recoveries was 98.47 ± 1.29 (n = 4). The pathway for the electrode reaction for both drugs involved reduction of the sulphonyl group into the corresponding thiol group at the Dropping Mercury Electrode. The advantages of the method were time saving and more sensitive than the other published voltammetric method. Yet The present study is the first report on the use of alterating current polarography (ACt) in this respect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Experience Sampling Study of Physical Activity and Positive Affect: Investigating the Role of Situational Motivation and Perceived Intensity Across Time. Editorial Board Fluorescent method for detection of cleaved collagens using O-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) A rapid and non leaky way for preparation of the sharp intracellular recording microelectrodes Quantification of penicillin G during labor and delivery by capillary electrophoresis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1