[“合理理由”——一个未定义的法律术语,用于证明杀害马科动物的正当理由]。

E Deegen
{"title":"[“合理理由”——一个未定义的法律术语,用于证明杀害马科动物的正当理由]。","authors":"E Deegen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Killing of a vertebrate animal in Germany is allowed or not punishable only if a \"reasonable cause\" can be identified (Article 17 No. 1 TierSchG). A legal definition of the term \"reasonable cause\" does not exist. Currently the following definitions of the \"reasonable cause\" for the killing of equids are accepted: 1. Slaughter (in accordance with the equid pass and waiting periods) reasonable cause: Food production, initiated by the owner's desire. The requirements for slaughter of a sick animal or an emergency slaughter are defined through EU-legislations. 2. Euthanasia (in its original meaning) Reasonable cause: a) Compassion, initiated through medical indication b) scientific purposes (experimental animals) initiated through governmental authorization of a research request c) Epidemiological reasons initiated through veterinary legislative measures. According to the law for the protection of animals (TierSchG) \"non curable pain or suffering\" is a prerequisite for the killing of an animal because of a medical indication. Presuming an adequate knowledge base of the veterinarian this should leave enough room for an adequate medically reasoned decision. However, both a faulty veterinary explanation of a reasonable cause and an undue delay of the euthanasia (follow Article 17) can lead to an illegal punishable act (severe pain or suffering). Examples of veterinary medical indications for euthanasia will be presented. In addition, the question whether euthanasia can be considered as an alternative to treatment will be discussed. Finally, the more restrictive interpretations of the \"reasonable cause\" put forth by insurance companies will be explained. Future higher court decisions should lead to an adaptation of the insurance companies' interpretations of the \"reasonable cause\" to the outline presented above.</p>","PeriodicalId":49278,"journal":{"name":"Dtw. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[\\\"Reasonable cause\\\"--an undefined legal term for the justification of the killing of equids].\",\"authors\":\"E Deegen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Killing of a vertebrate animal in Germany is allowed or not punishable only if a \\\"reasonable cause\\\" can be identified (Article 17 No. 1 TierSchG). A legal definition of the term \\\"reasonable cause\\\" does not exist. Currently the following definitions of the \\\"reasonable cause\\\" for the killing of equids are accepted: 1. Slaughter (in accordance with the equid pass and waiting periods) reasonable cause: Food production, initiated by the owner's desire. The requirements for slaughter of a sick animal or an emergency slaughter are defined through EU-legislations. 2. Euthanasia (in its original meaning) Reasonable cause: a) Compassion, initiated through medical indication b) scientific purposes (experimental animals) initiated through governmental authorization of a research request c) Epidemiological reasons initiated through veterinary legislative measures. According to the law for the protection of animals (TierSchG) \\\"non curable pain or suffering\\\" is a prerequisite for the killing of an animal because of a medical indication. Presuming an adequate knowledge base of the veterinarian this should leave enough room for an adequate medically reasoned decision. However, both a faulty veterinary explanation of a reasonable cause and an undue delay of the euthanasia (follow Article 17) can lead to an illegal punishable act (severe pain or suffering). Examples of veterinary medical indications for euthanasia will be presented. In addition, the question whether euthanasia can be considered as an alternative to treatment will be discussed. Finally, the more restrictive interpretations of the \\\"reasonable cause\\\" put forth by insurance companies will be explained. Future higher court decisions should lead to an adaptation of the insurance companies' interpretations of the \\\"reasonable cause\\\" to the outline presented above.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dtw. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dtw. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dtw. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在德国,只有在能够确定“合理原因”的情况下,才能允许或不惩罚脊椎动物(TierSchG第17条第1款)。“合理原因”一词的法律定义并不存在。目前被接受的杀害马科动物的“合理原因”的定义如下:屠宰(按照马的通行证和等待期)合理原因:食品生产,由业主的意愿发起。屠宰病畜或紧急屠宰的要求由欧盟立法规定。2. 合理的原因:a)同情,通过医学指证发起;b)科学目的(实验动物),通过政府授权的研究请求发起;c)流行病学原因,通过兽医立法措施发起。根据动物保护法(TierSchG)"无法治愈的疼痛或痛苦"是因医学指征而杀死动物的先决条件。假设兽医有足够的知识基础,这应该为充分的医学理性决定留下足够的空间。然而,兽医对合理原因的错误解释和安乐死的不当延迟(遵循第17条)都可能导致非法惩罚行为(严重疼痛或痛苦)。将介绍安乐死的兽医指征的例子。此外,是否可以考虑安乐死作为一种替代治疗的问题将被讨论。最后,对保险公司提出的“合理事由”进行了较为严格的解释。未来高等法院的判决应导致保险公司对“合理理由”的解释适应上述概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
["Reasonable cause"--an undefined legal term for the justification of the killing of equids].

Killing of a vertebrate animal in Germany is allowed or not punishable only if a "reasonable cause" can be identified (Article 17 No. 1 TierSchG). A legal definition of the term "reasonable cause" does not exist. Currently the following definitions of the "reasonable cause" for the killing of equids are accepted: 1. Slaughter (in accordance with the equid pass and waiting periods) reasonable cause: Food production, initiated by the owner's desire. The requirements for slaughter of a sick animal or an emergency slaughter are defined through EU-legislations. 2. Euthanasia (in its original meaning) Reasonable cause: a) Compassion, initiated through medical indication b) scientific purposes (experimental animals) initiated through governmental authorization of a research request c) Epidemiological reasons initiated through veterinary legislative measures. According to the law for the protection of animals (TierSchG) "non curable pain or suffering" is a prerequisite for the killing of an animal because of a medical indication. Presuming an adequate knowledge base of the veterinarian this should leave enough room for an adequate medically reasoned decision. However, both a faulty veterinary explanation of a reasonable cause and an undue delay of the euthanasia (follow Article 17) can lead to an illegal punishable act (severe pain or suffering). Examples of veterinary medical indications for euthanasia will be presented. In addition, the question whether euthanasia can be considered as an alternative to treatment will be discussed. Finally, the more restrictive interpretations of the "reasonable cause" put forth by insurance companies will be explained. Future higher court decisions should lead to an adaptation of the insurance companies' interpretations of the "reasonable cause" to the outline presented above.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of septicaemia and severe bacterial infections in foals with a new cefquinome formulation: a field study. Expression of heat shock proteins in tissues from young pigs exposed to transport stress. [Mortality in free living siskins (Spinus spinus Linnaeus, 1758) due to Salmonella typhimurium, phage type DT104 and DT013]. A first case of ehrlichiosis in a horse in Poland. Immunohistological demonstration of Rhodococcus equi in a trotter foal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1