球茎注射器冲洗器是慢性鼻窦炎细菌污染的潜在来源吗?

Glenn B Williams, Linda L Ross, Rakesh K Chandra
{"title":"球茎注射器冲洗器是慢性鼻窦炎细菌污染的潜在来源吗?","authors":"Glenn B Williams,&nbsp;Linda L Ross,&nbsp;Rakesh K Chandra","doi":"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine if bulb syringe irrigators are a potential source for bacterial contamination in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Standard 3-oz bulb syringe irrigators (n = 24) were each flushed with the following solutions twice daily: A (n = 8), sterile isotonic saline; B (n = 8), prepared hypertonic saline (3 tsp table salt/L of sterile water); and C (n = 8), prepared baking soda/saline (1 tsp table salt + 1 tsp baking soda/L of commercial sterile water). Syringes were stored on a residential bathroom counter, and two from each group were harvested for culture weekly for 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no growth from syringes irrigated with any of the three solutions after the first 7 days of irrigation. After the entire 4-week study period, potential pathogens were recovered from 6/8 (75%) bulbs from group A, 0/8 bulbs from group B, and 1/8 bulbs (12.5%) from group C. All positive cultures revealed growth by 1-2 days postinoculation (p = 0.002). The organism recovered from syringes in group A was Pseudomonas fluorescens in all six specimens. The one positive culture in group C represented a single colony of Gram-positive cocci.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under realistic conditions, bulb syringes are susceptible to contamination with potential bacterial pathogens, particularly when using unbuffered isotonic saline.</p>","PeriodicalId":72175,"journal":{"name":"American journal of rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3193","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are bulb syringe irrigators a potential source of bacterial contamination in chronic rhinosinusitis?\",\"authors\":\"Glenn B Williams,&nbsp;Linda L Ross,&nbsp;Rakesh K Chandra\",\"doi\":\"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine if bulb syringe irrigators are a potential source for bacterial contamination in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Standard 3-oz bulb syringe irrigators (n = 24) were each flushed with the following solutions twice daily: A (n = 8), sterile isotonic saline; B (n = 8), prepared hypertonic saline (3 tsp table salt/L of sterile water); and C (n = 8), prepared baking soda/saline (1 tsp table salt + 1 tsp baking soda/L of commercial sterile water). Syringes were stored on a residential bathroom counter, and two from each group were harvested for culture weekly for 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no growth from syringes irrigated with any of the three solutions after the first 7 days of irrigation. After the entire 4-week study period, potential pathogens were recovered from 6/8 (75%) bulbs from group A, 0/8 bulbs from group B, and 1/8 bulbs (12.5%) from group C. All positive cultures revealed growth by 1-2 days postinoculation (p = 0.002). The organism recovered from syringes in group A was Pseudomonas fluorescens in all six specimens. The one positive culture in group C represented a single colony of Gram-positive cocci.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under realistic conditions, bulb syringes are susceptible to contamination with potential bacterial pathogens, particularly when using unbuffered isotonic saline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of rhinology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3193\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是确定球状注射器冲洗器是否是慢性鼻窦炎患者细菌污染的潜在来源。方法:标准的3-oz球茎注射器冲洗器(n = 24),每天用以下溶液冲洗2次:A (n = 8),无菌等渗盐水;B (n = 8),配制高渗盐水(3茶匙食盐/L无菌水);C (n = 8),配制小苏打/生理盐水(1茶匙食盐+ 1茶匙小苏打/L商业无菌水)。注射器存放在住宅浴室柜台上,每组每周取2支进行培养,持续4周。结果:灌洗后7天,三种溶液中的任何一种均未见生长。在整个4周的研究期间,从A组的6/8(75%)、B组的0/8和c组的1/8(12.5%)的鳞茎中回收了潜在的病原体。接种后1-2天,所有阳性培养均显示生长(p = 0.002)。A组注射器检出的细菌均为荧光假单胞菌。C组1个阳性培养为革兰氏阳性球菌单个菌落。结论:在现实条件下,球管注射器容易受到潜在细菌病原体的污染,特别是当使用未缓冲的等渗盐水时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are bulb syringe irrigators a potential source of bacterial contamination in chronic rhinosinusitis?

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine if bulb syringe irrigators are a potential source for bacterial contamination in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Methods: Standard 3-oz bulb syringe irrigators (n = 24) were each flushed with the following solutions twice daily: A (n = 8), sterile isotonic saline; B (n = 8), prepared hypertonic saline (3 tsp table salt/L of sterile water); and C (n = 8), prepared baking soda/saline (1 tsp table salt + 1 tsp baking soda/L of commercial sterile water). Syringes were stored on a residential bathroom counter, and two from each group were harvested for culture weekly for 4 weeks.

Results: There was no growth from syringes irrigated with any of the three solutions after the first 7 days of irrigation. After the entire 4-week study period, potential pathogens were recovered from 6/8 (75%) bulbs from group A, 0/8 bulbs from group B, and 1/8 bulbs (12.5%) from group C. All positive cultures revealed growth by 1-2 days postinoculation (p = 0.002). The organism recovered from syringes in group A was Pseudomonas fluorescens in all six specimens. The one positive culture in group C represented a single colony of Gram-positive cocci.

Conclusion: Under realistic conditions, bulb syringes are susceptible to contamination with potential bacterial pathogens, particularly when using unbuffered isotonic saline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the etiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: an immune barrier hypothesis. Comparison of laryngeal mask with endotracheal tube for anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery. The effect of nasal surgery on snoring. Results of endoscopic maxillary mega-antrostomy in recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis. The efficacy of topical antibiofilm agents in a sheep model of rhinosinusitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1