体重减轻对超重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者鼻测量的影响。

Tatu Kemppainen, Pirkko Ruoppi, Juha Seppä, Johanna Sahlman, Markku Peltonen, Hannu Tukiainen, Helena Gylling, Esko Vanninen, Henri Tuomilehto
{"title":"体重减轻对超重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者鼻测量的影响。","authors":"Tatu Kemppainen,&nbsp;Pirkko Ruoppi,&nbsp;Juha Seppä,&nbsp;Johanna Sahlman,&nbsp;Markku Peltonen,&nbsp;Hannu Tukiainen,&nbsp;Helena Gylling,&nbsp;Esko Vanninen,&nbsp;Henri Tuomilehto","doi":"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated nasal resistance and obesity predispose to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Weight loss has been shown to result in an alleviation of OSA, but its effect on nasal airflow has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled study with two parallel groups. A total of 52 adult overweight patients (body mass index [BMI], 28-40 kg/m2) with mild obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), 5-15) were randomized into two study groups. The intervention group (n = 26) followed a very low calorie diet with a supervised lifestyle intervention while the control group (n = 26) received routine lifestyle counseling. The changes in BMI, total nasal resistance, total nasal volume, and quality of life scores (Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, MiniRQLQ) were assessed at baseline and after the intervention at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reduction in BMI in the intervention group was significantly greater than that achieved by patients in the control group (5.4 kg/m2 versus 0.5 kg/m2). Accordingly, AHI was reduced by 3.2 events/hour in the intervention group and by 1.3 in the control group. However, there were no significant changes in rhinometric measurements despite significant weight loss. There was no correlation between the reduction of BMI and the change in nasal resistance or MiniRQLQ scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Weight reduction does not seem to have any effect on nasal resistance or volume in overweight patients with mild OSA. Patients with OSA and impaired nasal breathing need specific medical or surgical treatment to restore nasal airflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":72175,"journal":{"name":"American journal of rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3203","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of weight reduction on rhinometric measurements in overweight patients with obstructive sleep apnea.\",\"authors\":\"Tatu Kemppainen,&nbsp;Pirkko Ruoppi,&nbsp;Juha Seppä,&nbsp;Johanna Sahlman,&nbsp;Markku Peltonen,&nbsp;Hannu Tukiainen,&nbsp;Helena Gylling,&nbsp;Esko Vanninen,&nbsp;Henri Tuomilehto\",\"doi\":\"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated nasal resistance and obesity predispose to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Weight loss has been shown to result in an alleviation of OSA, but its effect on nasal airflow has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled study with two parallel groups. A total of 52 adult overweight patients (body mass index [BMI], 28-40 kg/m2) with mild obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), 5-15) were randomized into two study groups. The intervention group (n = 26) followed a very low calorie diet with a supervised lifestyle intervention while the control group (n = 26) received routine lifestyle counseling. The changes in BMI, total nasal resistance, total nasal volume, and quality of life scores (Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, MiniRQLQ) were assessed at baseline and after the intervention at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reduction in BMI in the intervention group was significantly greater than that achieved by patients in the control group (5.4 kg/m2 versus 0.5 kg/m2). Accordingly, AHI was reduced by 3.2 events/hour in the intervention group and by 1.3 in the control group. However, there were no significant changes in rhinometric measurements despite significant weight loss. There was no correlation between the reduction of BMI and the change in nasal resistance or MiniRQLQ scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Weight reduction does not seem to have any effect on nasal resistance or volume in overweight patients with mild OSA. Patients with OSA and impaired nasal breathing need specific medical or surgical treatment to restore nasal airflow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of rhinology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3203\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

背景:鼻阻力升高和肥胖易导致阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)。体重减轻已被证明可以缓解阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停,但其对鼻腔气流的影响尚未得到研究。方法:本研究为前瞻性、随机、对照研究,分为两个平行组。将52例成人超重(体重指数[BMI] 28 ~ 40 kg/m2)伴轻度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI) 5 ~ 15)患者随机分为两组。干预组(n = 26)遵循极低热量饮食和有监督的生活方式干预,而对照组(n = 26)接受常规生活方式咨询。在基线和干预后3个月评估BMI、总鼻阻力、总鼻容积和生活质量评分(迷你鼻结膜炎生活质量问卷,MiniRQLQ)的变化。结果:干预组BMI下降幅度明显大于对照组(5.4 kg/m2 vs 0.5 kg/m2)。因此,干预组AHI降低了3.2事件/小时,对照组降低了1.3事件/小时。然而,尽管体重明显减轻,但鼻测量结果没有明显变化。BMI的降低与鼻阻力或MiniRQLQ评分的变化之间没有相关性。结论:体重减轻似乎对超重的轻度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的鼻阻力或体积没有任何影响。阻塞性呼吸暂停和鼻腔呼吸受损的患者需要特殊的药物或手术治疗来恢复鼻腔气流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of weight reduction on rhinometric measurements in overweight patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Background: Elevated nasal resistance and obesity predispose to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Weight loss has been shown to result in an alleviation of OSA, but its effect on nasal airflow has not been studied.

Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled study with two parallel groups. A total of 52 adult overweight patients (body mass index [BMI], 28-40 kg/m2) with mild obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), 5-15) were randomized into two study groups. The intervention group (n = 26) followed a very low calorie diet with a supervised lifestyle intervention while the control group (n = 26) received routine lifestyle counseling. The changes in BMI, total nasal resistance, total nasal volume, and quality of life scores (Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, MiniRQLQ) were assessed at baseline and after the intervention at 3 months.

Results: The reduction in BMI in the intervention group was significantly greater than that achieved by patients in the control group (5.4 kg/m2 versus 0.5 kg/m2). Accordingly, AHI was reduced by 3.2 events/hour in the intervention group and by 1.3 in the control group. However, there were no significant changes in rhinometric measurements despite significant weight loss. There was no correlation between the reduction of BMI and the change in nasal resistance or MiniRQLQ scores.

Conclusion: Weight reduction does not seem to have any effect on nasal resistance or volume in overweight patients with mild OSA. Patients with OSA and impaired nasal breathing need specific medical or surgical treatment to restore nasal airflow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the etiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: an immune barrier hypothesis. Comparison of laryngeal mask with endotracheal tube for anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery. The effect of nasal surgery on snoring. Results of endoscopic maxillary mega-antrostomy in recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis. The efficacy of topical antibiofilm agents in a sheep model of rhinosinusitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1