生育偏好指标的一致性和预测能力:来自印度农村的纵向证据。

Tarun K Roy, R K Sinha, Michael Koenig, Sanjay K Mohanty, Sangram K Patel
{"title":"生育偏好指标的一致性和预测能力:来自印度农村的纵向证据。","authors":"Tarun K Roy,&nbsp;R K Sinha,&nbsp;Michael Koenig,&nbsp;Sanjay K Mohanty,&nbsp;Sangram K Patel","doi":"10.1363/ifpp.34.138.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Ideal family size and desire for an additional child are the two most commonly used fertility preference indicators. However, little is known about the consistency over time of responses to each measure, the consistency between the two indicators or the predictive value of these indicators in India.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Longitudinal data from the 1998-1999 National Family Health Survey and a follow-up survey conducted four years later were analyzed to determine the consistency of responses to the two fertility preference indicators (both over time and between indicators) and to determine whether baseline responses were associated with subsequent fertility, unwanted births and contraceptive use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses on the measure of ideal family size were consistent at the two time points for 53% of nonsterilized women. Eighty-two percent of women who explicitly said in 1998 that they did not desire more children responded identically in 2002, although about half of these women had given birth in the intervening period. The indicators were associated with each other: Among women with at least one son, 79% of those who had attained or surpassed their ideal family size said they wanted to stop childbearing, compared with 18% of those who had not. Both indicators predicted future fertility, unwanted births and contraceptive use, particularly among women who had a son.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both indicators are useful in understanding future fertility behavior. As the prevalence of son preference declines in India, the predictive ability of the indicators is likely to improve.</p>","PeriodicalId":81537,"journal":{"name":"International family planning perspectives","volume":"34 3","pages":"138-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency and predictive ability of fertility preference indicators: longitudinal evidence from rural India.\",\"authors\":\"Tarun K Roy,&nbsp;R K Sinha,&nbsp;Michael Koenig,&nbsp;Sanjay K Mohanty,&nbsp;Sangram K Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1363/ifpp.34.138.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Ideal family size and desire for an additional child are the two most commonly used fertility preference indicators. However, little is known about the consistency over time of responses to each measure, the consistency between the two indicators or the predictive value of these indicators in India.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Longitudinal data from the 1998-1999 National Family Health Survey and a follow-up survey conducted four years later were analyzed to determine the consistency of responses to the two fertility preference indicators (both over time and between indicators) and to determine whether baseline responses were associated with subsequent fertility, unwanted births and contraceptive use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses on the measure of ideal family size were consistent at the two time points for 53% of nonsterilized women. Eighty-two percent of women who explicitly said in 1998 that they did not desire more children responded identically in 2002, although about half of these women had given birth in the intervening period. The indicators were associated with each other: Among women with at least one son, 79% of those who had attained or surpassed their ideal family size said they wanted to stop childbearing, compared with 18% of those who had not. Both indicators predicted future fertility, unwanted births and contraceptive use, particularly among women who had a son.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both indicators are useful in understanding future fertility behavior. As the prevalence of son preference declines in India, the predictive ability of the indicators is likely to improve.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International family planning perspectives\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"138-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International family planning perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1363/ifpp.34.138.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/ifpp.34.138.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:理想家庭规模和多生一个孩子的愿望是两个最常用的生育偏好指标。然而,对于每项措施的反应随时间的一致性、两个指标之间的一致性或这些指标在印度的预测价值,人们所知甚少。方法:分析1998-1999年全国家庭健康调查和四年后进行的后续调查的纵向数据,以确定对两项生育偏好指标(随时间推移和指标之间)的反应的一致性,并确定基线反应是否与随后的生育、意外生育和避孕药具的使用有关。结果:53%的未绝育妇女在两个时间点对理想家庭规模的测量结果是一致的。在1998年明确表示不想要更多孩子的女性中,有82%的人在2002年做出了同样的回应,尽管这些女性中约有一半在这段时间里生了孩子。这些指标是相互关联的:在至少有一个儿子的女性中,79%达到或超过理想家庭规模的女性说她们想停止生育,而在没有达到或超过理想家庭规模的女性中,这一比例为18%。这两项指标都预测了未来的生育率、意外生育和避孕措施的使用,尤其是有儿子的妇女。结论:这两项指标对了解未来生育行为有重要意义。随着印度重男轻女的盛行率下降,这些指标的预测能力可能会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consistency and predictive ability of fertility preference indicators: longitudinal evidence from rural India.

Context: Ideal family size and desire for an additional child are the two most commonly used fertility preference indicators. However, little is known about the consistency over time of responses to each measure, the consistency between the two indicators or the predictive value of these indicators in India.

Method: Longitudinal data from the 1998-1999 National Family Health Survey and a follow-up survey conducted four years later were analyzed to determine the consistency of responses to the two fertility preference indicators (both over time and between indicators) and to determine whether baseline responses were associated with subsequent fertility, unwanted births and contraceptive use.

Results: Responses on the measure of ideal family size were consistent at the two time points for 53% of nonsterilized women. Eighty-two percent of women who explicitly said in 1998 that they did not desire more children responded identically in 2002, although about half of these women had given birth in the intervening period. The indicators were associated with each other: Among women with at least one son, 79% of those who had attained or surpassed their ideal family size said they wanted to stop childbearing, compared with 18% of those who had not. Both indicators predicted future fertility, unwanted births and contraceptive use, particularly among women who had a son.

Conclusion: Both indicators are useful in understanding future fertility behavior. As the prevalence of son preference declines in India, the predictive ability of the indicators is likely to improve.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Danlou Tablet May Alleviate Vascular Injury Caused by Chronic Intermittent Hypoxia through Regulating FIH-1, HIF-1, and Angptl4. An Update to the Pilot Study of 177Lu-PSMA in Low Volume Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Psychometric properties of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (KKaPsy). The role of social support and parity on contraceptive use in Cambodia Early coital debut and associated HIV risk factors among young women and men in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1