高质量的牙科护理:一个复杂的课题。

Revue belge de medecine dentaire Pub Date : 2008-01-01
E Mortelmans, J Berghmans, M Justens
{"title":"高质量的牙科护理:一个复杂的课题。","authors":"E Mortelmans,&nbsp;J Berghmans,&nbsp;M Justens","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing the quality of dental care depends on the approach. From the patient's perspective the perception of the quality of care depends as much on the pure technical quality of the treatment as on the level of patient - doctor communication, organisation and administration experienced in relation to the treatment. From the point of view of the dental professionals who tend to focus primarily on outcome of treatment on the other hand, this way of patient's judging integrated quality of care might be quite frustrating. After all, thanks to verbal and organisational skills, making good impression despite bad diagnostic and treatment quality might come within reach of simply every dental professional. As desirable it might be, is it possible anyhow to measure if the ultimate quality of care meets the standards of care patients deserve? Certifying outcome of treatment is difficult since it depends on too much variables amongst which some (such as patient's compliance) might fall out of reach of control of the dental care professionals. That's why modern clinical guidelines and protocols stress on creating the ideal treatment steps and conditions most likely leading to the most favourable treatment result. Finally authorities and policymakers aspire more and more to the idea of indicators measuring clinical quality of care from a cost effectiveness point of view. In this respect the authors state that cheap high quality dental care for everybody has become out of date in the actual context. And defining limits to quality of care in order to gain affordability or accessibility, is going to be a tricky exercise requiring sound scientific thinking balanced with ethics.</p>","PeriodicalId":77359,"journal":{"name":"Revue belge de medecine dentaire","volume":"63 3","pages":"108-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Quality dental care: a complex subject].\",\"authors\":\"E Mortelmans,&nbsp;J Berghmans,&nbsp;M Justens\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessing the quality of dental care depends on the approach. From the patient's perspective the perception of the quality of care depends as much on the pure technical quality of the treatment as on the level of patient - doctor communication, organisation and administration experienced in relation to the treatment. From the point of view of the dental professionals who tend to focus primarily on outcome of treatment on the other hand, this way of patient's judging integrated quality of care might be quite frustrating. After all, thanks to verbal and organisational skills, making good impression despite bad diagnostic and treatment quality might come within reach of simply every dental professional. As desirable it might be, is it possible anyhow to measure if the ultimate quality of care meets the standards of care patients deserve? Certifying outcome of treatment is difficult since it depends on too much variables amongst which some (such as patient's compliance) might fall out of reach of control of the dental care professionals. That's why modern clinical guidelines and protocols stress on creating the ideal treatment steps and conditions most likely leading to the most favourable treatment result. Finally authorities and policymakers aspire more and more to the idea of indicators measuring clinical quality of care from a cost effectiveness point of view. In this respect the authors state that cheap high quality dental care for everybody has become out of date in the actual context. And defining limits to quality of care in order to gain affordability or accessibility, is going to be a tricky exercise requiring sound scientific thinking balanced with ethics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue belge de medecine dentaire\",\"volume\":\"63 3\",\"pages\":\"108-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue belge de medecine dentaire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue belge de medecine dentaire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估牙科护理的质量取决于方法。从患者的角度来看,对护理质量的感知不仅取决于治疗的纯粹技术质量,还取决于医患之间的沟通、组织和管理水平。从主要关注治疗结果的牙科专业人员的角度来看,另一方面,这种患者判断综合护理质量的方式可能会令人沮丧。毕竟,由于口头表达能力和组织能力,即使诊断和治疗质量不好,也能给人留下好印象,这可能是每个牙科专业人员都能做到的。正如人们所期望的那样,无论如何,是否有可能衡量护理的最终质量是否符合患者应得的护理标准?证明治疗结果是困难的,因为它取决于太多的变量,其中一些(如病人的依从性)可能超出牙科保健专业人员的控制范围。这就是为什么现代临床指南和协议强调创造理想的治疗步骤和条件,最可能导致最有利的治疗结果。最后,当局和政策制定者越来越渴望从成本效益的角度衡量临床护理质量的指标。在这方面,作者指出,在实际情况下,为每个人提供廉价的高质量牙科护理已经过时了。为了获得可负担性或可获得性,定义医疗质量的限制将是一项棘手的工作,需要合理的科学思维与伦理平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Quality dental care: a complex subject].

Assessing the quality of dental care depends on the approach. From the patient's perspective the perception of the quality of care depends as much on the pure technical quality of the treatment as on the level of patient - doctor communication, organisation and administration experienced in relation to the treatment. From the point of view of the dental professionals who tend to focus primarily on outcome of treatment on the other hand, this way of patient's judging integrated quality of care might be quite frustrating. After all, thanks to verbal and organisational skills, making good impression despite bad diagnostic and treatment quality might come within reach of simply every dental professional. As desirable it might be, is it possible anyhow to measure if the ultimate quality of care meets the standards of care patients deserve? Certifying outcome of treatment is difficult since it depends on too much variables amongst which some (such as patient's compliance) might fall out of reach of control of the dental care professionals. That's why modern clinical guidelines and protocols stress on creating the ideal treatment steps and conditions most likely leading to the most favourable treatment result. Finally authorities and policymakers aspire more and more to the idea of indicators measuring clinical quality of care from a cost effectiveness point of view. In this respect the authors state that cheap high quality dental care for everybody has become out of date in the actual context. And defining limits to quality of care in order to gain affordability or accessibility, is going to be a tricky exercise requiring sound scientific thinking balanced with ethics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Value(s)]. Esthetic Dentistry [Occupational diseases in sugar workers. Results of an enquiry. 1926]. [The Industrial Accidents act (1903) and the birth of the Industrial Accidents Fund (1967)]. [Revision of the guidelines for the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders approved by the "Council of the AADR" 3 March 2010].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1