基于Ga-67混合SPECT图像的纵隔病灶检测迭代重建策略评价。

N F Pereira, H C Gifford, P H Pretorius, T Farncombe, M Smyczynski, R Licho, P Schneider, M A King
{"title":"基于Ga-67混合SPECT图像的纵隔病灶检测迭代重建策略评价。","authors":"N F Pereira,&nbsp;H C Gifford,&nbsp;P H Pretorius,&nbsp;T Farncombe,&nbsp;M Smyczynski,&nbsp;R Licho,&nbsp;P Schneider,&nbsp;M A King","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2007.4436881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hybrid LROC studies can be used to more realistically assess the impact of reconstruction strategies, compared to those constructed with digital phantoms. This is because hybrid data provides the background variability that is present in clinical imaging, as well as, control over critical imaging parameters, required to conduct meaningful tests. Hybrid data is obtained by adding Monte Carlo simulated lesions to disease free clinical projection data. Due to Ga-67 being a particularly challenging radionuclide for imaging, we use Ga-67 hybrid SPECT data to study the effectiveness of the various correction strategies developed to account for degradations in SPECT imaging. Our data was obtained using GE-VG dual detector SPECT-CT camera. After determining a target lesion contrast we conduct pilot LROC studies to obtain a near-optimal set of reconstruction parameters for the different strategies individually. These near-optimal parameters are then used to reconstruct the final evaluation study sets. All LROC study results reported here were obtained employing human observers only. We use final LROC study results to assess the impact of attenuation compensation, scatter compensation and detector resolution compensation on data reconstructed with the RBI-EM algorithm. We also compare these with FBP reconstructions of the same dataset. Our experiment indicates an improvement in detection accuracy, as various degradations inherent in the image acquisition process are compensated for in the reconstruction process.</p>","PeriodicalId":73298,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium","volume":"5 ","pages":"3486-3490"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/NSSMIC.2007.4436881","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of Iterative Reconstruction Strategies on Mediastinal Lesion Detection Using Hybrid Ga-67 SPECT Images.\",\"authors\":\"N F Pereira,&nbsp;H C Gifford,&nbsp;P H Pretorius,&nbsp;T Farncombe,&nbsp;M Smyczynski,&nbsp;R Licho,&nbsp;P Schneider,&nbsp;M A King\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NSSMIC.2007.4436881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hybrid LROC studies can be used to more realistically assess the impact of reconstruction strategies, compared to those constructed with digital phantoms. This is because hybrid data provides the background variability that is present in clinical imaging, as well as, control over critical imaging parameters, required to conduct meaningful tests. Hybrid data is obtained by adding Monte Carlo simulated lesions to disease free clinical projection data. Due to Ga-67 being a particularly challenging radionuclide for imaging, we use Ga-67 hybrid SPECT data to study the effectiveness of the various correction strategies developed to account for degradations in SPECT imaging. Our data was obtained using GE-VG dual detector SPECT-CT camera. After determining a target lesion contrast we conduct pilot LROC studies to obtain a near-optimal set of reconstruction parameters for the different strategies individually. These near-optimal parameters are then used to reconstruct the final evaluation study sets. All LROC study results reported here were obtained employing human observers only. We use final LROC study results to assess the impact of attenuation compensation, scatter compensation and detector resolution compensation on data reconstructed with the RBI-EM algorithm. We also compare these with FBP reconstructions of the same dataset. Our experiment indicates an improvement in detection accuracy, as various degradations inherent in the image acquisition process are compensated for in the reconstruction process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"3486-3490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/NSSMIC.2007.4436881\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2007.4436881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2007.4436881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与使用数字幻影构建的研究相比,混合LROC研究可用于更真实地评估重建策略的影响。这是因为混合数据提供了临床成像中存在的背景可变性,以及对进行有意义测试所需的关键成像参数的控制。混合数据是通过将蒙特卡罗模拟病变添加到无病临床投影数据中获得的。由于Ga-67是一种特别具有挑战性的成像放射性核素,我们使用Ga-67混合SPECT数据来研究各种校正策略的有效性,以解释SPECT成像中的退化。我们的数据是通过GE-VG双探测器SPECT-CT相机获得的。在确定目标病变对比后,我们进行试点LROC研究,以获得不同策略的近似最优重建参数集。然后使用这些接近最优的参数来重建最终的评估研究集。本文报道的所有LROC研究结果仅采用人类观察员获得。我们使用最终的LROC研究结果来评估衰减补偿、散射补偿和探测器分辨率补偿对RBI-EM算法重构数据的影响。我们还将这些与相同数据集的FBP重建进行了比较。我们的实验表明检测精度有所提高,因为图像采集过程中固有的各种退化在重建过程中得到了补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Evaluation of Iterative Reconstruction Strategies on Mediastinal Lesion Detection Using Hybrid Ga-67 SPECT Images.

Hybrid LROC studies can be used to more realistically assess the impact of reconstruction strategies, compared to those constructed with digital phantoms. This is because hybrid data provides the background variability that is present in clinical imaging, as well as, control over critical imaging parameters, required to conduct meaningful tests. Hybrid data is obtained by adding Monte Carlo simulated lesions to disease free clinical projection data. Due to Ga-67 being a particularly challenging radionuclide for imaging, we use Ga-67 hybrid SPECT data to study the effectiveness of the various correction strategies developed to account for degradations in SPECT imaging. Our data was obtained using GE-VG dual detector SPECT-CT camera. After determining a target lesion contrast we conduct pilot LROC studies to obtain a near-optimal set of reconstruction parameters for the different strategies individually. These near-optimal parameters are then used to reconstruct the final evaluation study sets. All LROC study results reported here were obtained employing human observers only. We use final LROC study results to assess the impact of attenuation compensation, scatter compensation and detector resolution compensation on data reconstructed with the RBI-EM algorithm. We also compare these with FBP reconstructions of the same dataset. Our experiment indicates an improvement in detection accuracy, as various degradations inherent in the image acquisition process are compensated for in the reconstruction process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ablation Study of Diffusion Model with Transformer Backbone for Low-count PET Denoising. Point-supervised Brain Tumor Segmentation with Box-prompted Medical Segment Anything Model. Subject-aware PET Denoising with Contrastive Adversarial Domain Generalization. Calibration Methodology of an Edgeless PET System Prototype. Tensor Tomography of Dark Field Scatter using X-ray Interferometry with Bi-prisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1