一项随机试验:家庭力量训练和家庭平衡训练对膝关节骨关节炎患者疼痛的影响无差异

Kanda Chaipinyo, Orapin Karoonsupcharoen
{"title":"一项随机试验:家庭力量训练和家庭平衡训练对膝关节骨关节炎患者疼痛的影响无差异","authors":"Kanda Chaipinyo,&nbsp;Orapin Karoonsupcharoen","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70057-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Is four weeks of home-based balance training more effective than four weeks of home-based strength training at decreasing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised trial with concealed allocation and assessor blinding.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>48 community volunteers with knee osteoarthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Two groups undertook home-based exercise programs: one group performed balance training and the other performed strength training. Participants performed 30 repetitions/leg/day, 5 days/week for four weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was used to evaluate pain, which was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the other subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (other symptoms, function in daily living, function in sport and recreation, knee-related quality of life), strength, and mobility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no significant difference between groups for pain (mean difference –3 points out of 100, 95% CI –10 to 5). The only between-group difference in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was in knee-related quality of life, where the strength group improved 17 points out of 100 (95% CI 5 to 28) more than the balance group. There was no significant difference between groups for strength. The only between-group difference in mobility was in the time taken to walk downstairs, where the strength group improved by 2 s (95% CI 0 to 3) more than the balance group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no difference in pain between home-based strength training and home-based balance training in patients with knee osteoarthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>NCT 00687726.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"Pages 25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70057-1","citationCount":"65","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No difference between home-based strength training and home-based balance training on pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial\",\"authors\":\"Kanda Chaipinyo,&nbsp;Orapin Karoonsupcharoen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70057-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Is four weeks of home-based balance training more effective than four weeks of home-based strength training at decreasing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised trial with concealed allocation and assessor blinding.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>48 community volunteers with knee osteoarthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Two groups undertook home-based exercise programs: one group performed balance training and the other performed strength training. Participants performed 30 repetitions/leg/day, 5 days/week for four weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was used to evaluate pain, which was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the other subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (other symptoms, function in daily living, function in sport and recreation, knee-related quality of life), strength, and mobility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no significant difference between groups for pain (mean difference –3 points out of 100, 95% CI –10 to 5). The only between-group difference in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was in knee-related quality of life, where the strength group improved 17 points out of 100 (95% CI 5 to 28) more than the balance group. There was no significant difference between groups for strength. The only between-group difference in mobility was in the time taken to walk downstairs, where the strength group improved by 2 s (95% CI 0 to 3) more than the balance group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no difference in pain between home-based strength training and home-based balance training in patients with knee osteoarthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>NCT 00687726.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 25-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70057-1\",\"citationCount\":\"65\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

摘要

在减轻膝骨关节炎患者疼痛方面,四周的家庭平衡训练是否比四周的家庭力量训练更有效?设计随机试验,隐蔽分配和评估盲法。参与者是48名患有膝骨关节炎的社区志愿者。干预两组进行基于家庭的锻炼计划:一组进行平衡训练,另一组进行力量训练。参与者每天每腿重复30次,每周5天,持续四周。结局测量:膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分用于评估疼痛,这是主要结局。次要结局是膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分的其他亚量表(其他症状、日常生活功能、运动和娱乐功能、膝关节相关生活质量)、力量和活动能力。结果组间疼痛无显著差异(100分中平均差-3分,95% CI为-10至5)。膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分的组间唯一差异是膝关节相关生活质量,其中力量组比平衡组提高了17分(100分中95% CI为5至28)。各组间强度无显著差异。活动度的唯一组间差异是步行下楼的时间,其中力量组比平衡组多改善了2秒(95% CI 0 - 3)。结论家庭力量训练与家庭平衡训练对膝关节骨性关节炎患者疼痛的影响无显著差异。试验注册nct 00687726。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
No difference between home-based strength training and home-based balance training on pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial

Question

Is four weeks of home-based balance training more effective than four weeks of home-based strength training at decreasing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis?

Design

Randomised trial with concealed allocation and assessor blinding.

Participants

48 community volunteers with knee osteoarthritis.

Intervention

Two groups undertook home-based exercise programs: one group performed balance training and the other performed strength training. Participants performed 30 repetitions/leg/day, 5 days/week for four weeks.

Outcome measures

The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was used to evaluate pain, which was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the other subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (other symptoms, function in daily living, function in sport and recreation, knee-related quality of life), strength, and mobility.

Results

There was no significant difference between groups for pain (mean difference –3 points out of 100, 95% CI –10 to 5). The only between-group difference in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was in knee-related quality of life, where the strength group improved 17 points out of 100 (95% CI 5 to 28) more than the balance group. There was no significant difference between groups for strength. The only between-group difference in mobility was in the time taken to walk downstairs, where the strength group improved by 2 s (95% CI 0 to 3) more than the balance group.

Conclusion

There was no difference in pain between home-based strength training and home-based balance training in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Trial registration

NCT 00687726.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum Erratum Telerehabilitation: a coming of age Females with patellofemoral pain syndrome have weak hip muscles: a systematic review Passive mobilisation of shoulder region joints plus advice and exercise does not reduce pain and disability more than advice and exercise alone: a randomised trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1