G Alessandro Digesu, Stavros Athanasiou, Linda Cardozo, Simon Hill, Vik Khullar
{"title":"左侧体位盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)系统的验证。","authors":"G Alessandro Digesu, Stavros Athanasiou, Linda Cardozo, Simon Hill, Vik Khullar","doi":"10.1007/s00192-009-0884-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>The purpose of this study is to examine the inter-observer reliability of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women attending urogynaecology outpatient clinics were examined in the left lateral position using a digital examination and POP-Q. This was repeated separately by a second blinded clinician. The inter-observer agreement was calculated using the Cohen's kappa coefficient. The POP-Q examination was then performed with a woman lying in dorsal lithotomy position. The POP-Q findings in the two positions were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and eighteen women were recruited. The digital examination had a moderate inter-observer reliability with a kappa value of 0.54. The POP-Q showed a high degree of reliability (0.88). There was a high degree of correlation between the POP-Q findings in left lateral and lithotomy position (rho > 0.95, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The POP-Q in the left lateral position is reliable, easy to perform, acceptable for patients, and is not a time-consuming examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":73495,"journal":{"name":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":"20 8","pages":"979-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0884-z","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position.\",\"authors\":\"G Alessandro Digesu, Stavros Athanasiou, Linda Cardozo, Simon Hill, Vik Khullar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-009-0884-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>The purpose of this study is to examine the inter-observer reliability of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women attending urogynaecology outpatient clinics were examined in the left lateral position using a digital examination and POP-Q. This was repeated separately by a second blinded clinician. The inter-observer agreement was calculated using the Cohen's kappa coefficient. The POP-Q examination was then performed with a woman lying in dorsal lithotomy position. The POP-Q findings in the two positions were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and eighteen women were recruited. The digital examination had a moderate inter-observer reliability with a kappa value of 0.54. The POP-Q showed a high degree of reliability (0.88). There was a high degree of correlation between the POP-Q findings in left lateral and lithotomy position (rho > 0.95, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The POP-Q in the left lateral position is reliable, easy to perform, acceptable for patients, and is not a time-consuming examination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"979-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0884-z\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0884-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2009/4/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0884-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
摘要
前言和假设:本研究的目的是检验左侧体位盆腔器官脱垂量化(POP-Q)系统的观察者间可靠性。方法:在泌尿妇科门诊就诊的女性采用指位检查和POP-Q检查左侧位。另一名盲法临床医生分别重复了这一实验。使用科恩卡帕系数计算观察者间的协议。然后对一名躺在背部取石位的妇女进行POP-Q检查。比较两个位置的POP-Q结果。结果:共招募了218名女性。数字检查具有中等的观察者间信度,kappa值为0.54。POP-Q具有较高的信度(0.88)。左侧卧位的POP-Q与取石位高度相关(rho > 0.95, p < 0.001)。结论:左侧卧位POP-Q可靠,操作简便,患者可接受,且不耗时。
Validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position.
Introduction and hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to examine the inter-observer reliability of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position.
Methods: Women attending urogynaecology outpatient clinics were examined in the left lateral position using a digital examination and POP-Q. This was repeated separately by a second blinded clinician. The inter-observer agreement was calculated using the Cohen's kappa coefficient. The POP-Q examination was then performed with a woman lying in dorsal lithotomy position. The POP-Q findings in the two positions were compared.
Results: Two hundred and eighteen women were recruited. The digital examination had a moderate inter-observer reliability with a kappa value of 0.54. The POP-Q showed a high degree of reliability (0.88). There was a high degree of correlation between the POP-Q findings in left lateral and lithotomy position (rho > 0.95, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The POP-Q in the left lateral position is reliable, easy to perform, acceptable for patients, and is not a time-consuming examination.