美国高中生学校纪律的种族、民族和性别差异:1991-2005。

The Negro educational review Pub Date : 2008-01-01
John M Wallace, Sara Goodkind, Cynthia M Wallace, Jerald G Bachman
{"title":"美国高中生学校纪律的种族、民族和性别差异:1991-2005。","authors":"John M Wallace,&nbsp;Sara Goodkind,&nbsp;Cynthia M Wallace,&nbsp;Jerald G Bachman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study uses large nationally representative samples of White, Black, Hispanic, Asian American, and American Indian students to examine current patterns and recent trends (1991 to 2005) in racial, ethnic, and gender differences in school discipline. We found that Black, Hispanic, and American Indian youth are slightly more likely than White and Asian American youth to be sent to the office and substantially (two to five times) more likely to be suspended or expelled. Although school discipline rates decreased over time for most ethnic groups, among Black students school discipline rates increased between 1991 and 2005. Logistic regression analyses that controlled for racial and ethnic differences in socio-demographic factors suggest racial and ethnic differences in school discipline do not result from racial and ethnic differences in socioeconomic status. Future research and practice efforts should seek to better understand and to eliminate racial, ethnic and gender disproportionality in school discipline.</p>","PeriodicalId":88326,"journal":{"name":"The Negro educational review","volume":"59 1-2","pages":"47-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2678799/pdf/nihms50094.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in School Discipline among U.S. High School Students: 1991-2005.\",\"authors\":\"John M Wallace,&nbsp;Sara Goodkind,&nbsp;Cynthia M Wallace,&nbsp;Jerald G Bachman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present study uses large nationally representative samples of White, Black, Hispanic, Asian American, and American Indian students to examine current patterns and recent trends (1991 to 2005) in racial, ethnic, and gender differences in school discipline. We found that Black, Hispanic, and American Indian youth are slightly more likely than White and Asian American youth to be sent to the office and substantially (two to five times) more likely to be suspended or expelled. Although school discipline rates decreased over time for most ethnic groups, among Black students school discipline rates increased between 1991 and 2005. Logistic regression analyses that controlled for racial and ethnic differences in socio-demographic factors suggest racial and ethnic differences in school discipline do not result from racial and ethnic differences in socioeconomic status. Future research and practice efforts should seek to better understand and to eliminate racial, ethnic and gender disproportionality in school discipline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Negro educational review\",\"volume\":\"59 1-2\",\"pages\":\"47-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2678799/pdf/nihms50094.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Negro educational review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Negro educational review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用了大量具有全国代表性的白人、黑人、西班牙裔、亚裔美国人和美洲印第安人学生样本,以检验学校纪律中种族、民族和性别差异的当前模式和近期趋势(1991年至2005年)。我们发现,黑人、西班牙裔和美洲印第安青年被送去学校的可能性比白人和亚裔美国青年略高,而被停学或开除的可能性(两到五倍)要高得多。虽然大多数种族的学校纪律率随着时间的推移而下降,但黑人学生的学校纪律率在1991年至2005年间有所上升。控制社会人口因素中种族和民族差异的逻辑回归分析表明,学校纪律的种族和民族差异并非由社会经济地位的种族和民族差异造成的。今后的研究和实践努力应力求更好地了解和消除学校纪律中种族、民族和性别不相称的现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in School Discipline among U.S. High School Students: 1991-2005.

The present study uses large nationally representative samples of White, Black, Hispanic, Asian American, and American Indian students to examine current patterns and recent trends (1991 to 2005) in racial, ethnic, and gender differences in school discipline. We found that Black, Hispanic, and American Indian youth are slightly more likely than White and Asian American youth to be sent to the office and substantially (two to five times) more likely to be suspended or expelled. Although school discipline rates decreased over time for most ethnic groups, among Black students school discipline rates increased between 1991 and 2005. Logistic regression analyses that controlled for racial and ethnic differences in socio-demographic factors suggest racial and ethnic differences in school discipline do not result from racial and ethnic differences in socioeconomic status. Future research and practice efforts should seek to better understand and to eliminate racial, ethnic and gender disproportionality in school discipline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Bi-Generational Narrative in the Brown v. Board Decision Minority Status, Oppositional Culture, & Schooling Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in School Discipline among U.S. High School Students: 1991-2005. A Class of Their Own: Black Teachers in the Segregated South The Big Disconnect between Segregation and Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1