口服降糖药无效的2型糖尿病患者使用双相胰岛素aspart30改善血糖控制:目前的研究结果

Serdar Güler MD, Surendra Kumar Sharma MD, Majeed Almustafa MD, ChB, MRCP (UK), FRCP (Ed.), Chong Hwa Kim MD, PhD, Sami Azar MD, FACP, Rucsandra Danciulescu MD, PhD, Marina Shestakova MD, PhD, Duma Khutsoane MD, MMed Intern(ufs), FCP(SA), Ole Molskov Bech MD, MBA
{"title":"口服降糖药无效的2型糖尿病患者使用双相胰岛素aspart30改善血糖控制:目前的研究结果","authors":"Serdar Güler MD,&nbsp;Surendra Kumar Sharma MD,&nbsp;Majeed Almustafa MD, ChB, MRCP (UK), FRCP (Ed.),&nbsp;Chong Hwa Kim MD, PhD,&nbsp;Sami Azar MD, FACP,&nbsp;Rucsandra Danciulescu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Marina Shestakova MD, PhD,&nbsp;Duma Khutsoane MD, MMed Intern(ufs), FCP(SA),&nbsp;Ole Molskov Bech MD, MBA","doi":"10.1111/j.1753-5174.2008.00015.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Aims. </b> This paper presents the treatment outcomes for patients intiated on biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) treatment: BIAsp 30-only, BIAsp 30 + sulphonylureas (SU), BIAsp 30 + biguanides (BI), BIAsp 30 + SU + BI, BIAsp 30 + alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (GI), and BIAsp 30 + BI + thiazolidinediones (TZD) after failing oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) treatment.</p><p><b>Methods. </b> This was a multi-national, multi-centre, six-month, prospective, open-labelled, uncontrolled, clinical experience evaluation study, with the exception of a three-month study in one country (China) (“all exclude China” and “China”). Initiation and discontinuation of BIAsp 30 treatment were entirely at the discretion of the attending physicians.</p><p><b>Results. </b> Mean HbA<sub>1c</sub>, FPG and PPPG were significantly reduced from baseline at three and six months in all groups (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). In “all exclude China”, reductions in mean HbA<sub>1c</sub>, FPG and PPPG at six months were as follows: BIAsp 30-only group (−2.12 ± 1.76% points; −4.82 ± 3.86 mmol/L; −6.89 ± 4.74 mmol/L), BIAsp 30 + BI group (−2.24 ± 1.77% points; −4.48 ± 3.68 mmol/L; −6.66 ± 4.55 mmol/L), BIAsp 30 + SU group (−1.95 ± 1.59% points; −3.98 ± 3.19 mmol/L; −6.25 ± 4.45 mmol/L) and BIAsp 30 + SU + BI group (−1.78 ± 1.20% points; −3.57 ± 2.78 mmol/L; −5.89 ± 3.98 mmol/L). The only serious adverse drug reaction was reported by the BIAsp 30-only group. In the “China” group, reductions in mean HbA<sub>1c</sub>, FPG and PPPG at three months were: BIAsp 30-only group (−2.16 ± 1.52% points; −3.34 ± 2.49 mmol/L; −6.29 ± 3.92 mmol/L), BIAsp 30 + BI group (−2.44 ± 1.52% points; −4.01 ± 2.50 mmol/L; −7.10 ± 3.96 mmol/L), BIAsp 30 + GI group (−2.33 ± 1.41% points; −4.34 ± 2.52 mmol/L; −7.97 ± 3.99 mmol/L) and BIAsp 30 + BI + TZD group (−1.21 ± 1.60% points; −3.50 ± 2.29 mmol/L; −5.97 ± 3.39 mmol/L). No serious ADR were reported in China. The most frequent hypoglycaemic episodes were diurnal and minor in nature.</p><p><b>Conclusions. </b> BIAsp 30 treatment in a clinical setting improved glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients failing OADs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8181,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Drug Information","volume":"2 2","pages":"23-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2008.00015.x","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Glycaemic Control with Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Failing Oral Antidiabetic Drugs: PRESENT Study Results\",\"authors\":\"Serdar Güler MD,&nbsp;Surendra Kumar Sharma MD,&nbsp;Majeed Almustafa MD, ChB, MRCP (UK), FRCP (Ed.),&nbsp;Chong Hwa Kim MD, PhD,&nbsp;Sami Azar MD, FACP,&nbsp;Rucsandra Danciulescu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Marina Shestakova MD, PhD,&nbsp;Duma Khutsoane MD, MMed Intern(ufs), FCP(SA),&nbsp;Ole Molskov Bech MD, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1753-5174.2008.00015.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Aims. </b> This paper presents the treatment outcomes for patients intiated on biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) treatment: BIAsp 30-only, BIAsp 30 + sulphonylureas (SU), BIAsp 30 + biguanides (BI), BIAsp 30 + SU + BI, BIAsp 30 + alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (GI), and BIAsp 30 + BI + thiazolidinediones (TZD) after failing oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) treatment.</p><p><b>Methods. </b> This was a multi-national, multi-centre, six-month, prospective, open-labelled, uncontrolled, clinical experience evaluation study, with the exception of a three-month study in one country (China) (“all exclude China” and “China”). Initiation and discontinuation of BIAsp 30 treatment were entirely at the discretion of the attending physicians.</p><p><b>Results. </b> Mean HbA<sub>1c</sub>, FPG and PPPG were significantly reduced from baseline at three and six months in all groups (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). In “all exclude China”, reductions in mean HbA<sub>1c</sub>, FPG and PPPG at six months were as follows: BIAsp 30-only group (−2.12 ± 1.76% points; −4.82 ± 3.86 mmol/L; −6.89 ± 4.74 mmol/L), BIAsp 30 + BI group (−2.24 ± 1.77% points; −4.48 ± 3.68 mmol/L; −6.66 ± 4.55 mmol/L), BIAsp 30 + SU group (−1.95 ± 1.59% points; −3.98 ± 3.19 mmol/L; −6.25 ± 4.45 mmol/L) and BIAsp 30 + SU + BI group (−1.78 ± 1.20% points; −3.57 ± 2.78 mmol/L; −5.89 ± 3.98 mmol/L). The only serious adverse drug reaction was reported by the BIAsp 30-only group. In the “China” group, reductions in mean HbA<sub>1c</sub>, FPG and PPPG at three months were: BIAsp 30-only group (−2.16 ± 1.52% points; −3.34 ± 2.49 mmol/L; −6.29 ± 3.92 mmol/L), BIAsp 30 + BI group (−2.44 ± 1.52% points; −4.01 ± 2.50 mmol/L; −7.10 ± 3.96 mmol/L), BIAsp 30 + GI group (−2.33 ± 1.41% points; −4.34 ± 2.52 mmol/L; −7.97 ± 3.99 mmol/L) and BIAsp 30 + BI + TZD group (−1.21 ± 1.60% points; −3.50 ± 2.29 mmol/L; −5.97 ± 3.39 mmol/L). No serious ADR were reported in China. The most frequent hypoglycaemic episodes were diurnal and minor in nature.</p><p><b>Conclusions. </b> BIAsp 30 treatment in a clinical setting improved glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients failing OADs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Drug Information\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"23-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2008.00015.x\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Drug Information\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2008.00015.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Drug Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2008.00015.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目标本文介绍了在口服降糖药(OADs)治疗失败后开始双相胰岛素-天冬氨酸30 (BIAsp 30)治疗的患者的治疗结果:仅BIAsp 30、BIAsp 30 +磺脲类(SU)、BIAsp 30 +双胍类(BI)、BIAsp 30 + SU + BI、BIAsp 30 + α -葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂(GI)、BIAsp 30 + BI +噻唑烷二酮类(TZD)。这是一项多国、多中心、为期6个月、前瞻性、开放标签、非对照、临床经验评估研究,除了在一个国家(中国)进行的为期3个月的研究(“全部排除中国”和“中国”)。BIAsp 30治疗的开始和终止完全由主治医师决定。在3个月和6个月时,各组平均HbA1c、FPG和PPPG均较基线显著降低(P < 0.001)。在“全部排除中国”的情况下,6个月时平均HbA1c、FPG和PPPG的下降如下:仅BIAsp 30组(- 2.12±1.76%点;−4.82±3.86 mmol/L;−6.89±4.74更易/ L), BIAsp 30 + BI集团(−2.24±1.77%;−4.48±3.68 mmol/L;−6.66±4.55更易/ L), BIAsp 30 +苏集团(−1.95±1.59%;−3.98±3.19 mmol/L;−6.25±4.45更易/ L)和苏BIAsp 30 + + BI集团(−1.78±1.20%;−3.57±2.78 mmol/L;−5.89±3.98 mmol/L)。仅BIAsp 30组报告了唯一的严重药物不良反应。在“中国”组中,三个月时平均HbA1c、FPG和PPPG的下降为:仅BIAsp 30组(- 2.16±1.52%点;−3.34±2.49 mmol/L;−6.29±3.92更易/ L), BIAsp 30 + BI集团(−2.44±1.52%;−4.01±2.50 mmol/L;−7.10±3.96更易/ L), BIAsp 30 + GI组(−2.33±1.41%;−4.34±2.52 mmol/L;−7.97±3.99更易/ L)和BIAsp 30 + BI + TZD集团(−1.21±1.60%;−3.50±2.29 mmol/L;−5.97±3.39 mmol/L)。在中国没有严重的不良反应报告。最常见的低血糖发作发生在白天,性质轻微。BIAsp 30治疗可改善oad失败的2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improved Glycaemic Control with Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Failing Oral Antidiabetic Drugs: PRESENT Study Results

Aims. This paper presents the treatment outcomes for patients intiated on biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) treatment: BIAsp 30-only, BIAsp 30 + sulphonylureas (SU), BIAsp 30 + biguanides (BI), BIAsp 30 + SU + BI, BIAsp 30 + alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (GI), and BIAsp 30 + BI + thiazolidinediones (TZD) after failing oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) treatment.

Methods. This was a multi-national, multi-centre, six-month, prospective, open-labelled, uncontrolled, clinical experience evaluation study, with the exception of a three-month study in one country (China) (“all exclude China” and “China”). Initiation and discontinuation of BIAsp 30 treatment were entirely at the discretion of the attending physicians.

Results. Mean HbA1c, FPG and PPPG were significantly reduced from baseline at three and six months in all groups (P < 0.001). In “all exclude China”, reductions in mean HbA1c, FPG and PPPG at six months were as follows: BIAsp 30-only group (−2.12 ± 1.76% points; −4.82 ± 3.86 mmol/L; −6.89 ± 4.74 mmol/L), BIAsp 30 + BI group (−2.24 ± 1.77% points; −4.48 ± 3.68 mmol/L; −6.66 ± 4.55 mmol/L), BIAsp 30 + SU group (−1.95 ± 1.59% points; −3.98 ± 3.19 mmol/L; −6.25 ± 4.45 mmol/L) and BIAsp 30 + SU + BI group (−1.78 ± 1.20% points; −3.57 ± 2.78 mmol/L; −5.89 ± 3.98 mmol/L). The only serious adverse drug reaction was reported by the BIAsp 30-only group. In the “China” group, reductions in mean HbA1c, FPG and PPPG at three months were: BIAsp 30-only group (−2.16 ± 1.52% points; −3.34 ± 2.49 mmol/L; −6.29 ± 3.92 mmol/L), BIAsp 30 + BI group (−2.44 ± 1.52% points; −4.01 ± 2.50 mmol/L; −7.10 ± 3.96 mmol/L), BIAsp 30 + GI group (−2.33 ± 1.41% points; −4.34 ± 2.52 mmol/L; −7.97 ± 3.99 mmol/L) and BIAsp 30 + BI + TZD group (−1.21 ± 1.60% points; −3.50 ± 2.29 mmol/L; −5.97 ± 3.39 mmol/L). No serious ADR were reported in China. The most frequent hypoglycaemic episodes were diurnal and minor in nature.

Conclusions. BIAsp 30 treatment in a clinical setting improved glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients failing OADs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epoetin Theta with a New Dosing Schedule in Anaemic Cancer Patients Receiving Nonplatinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Randomised Controlled Trial Phase I Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of AZD4877 in Japanese Patients with Solid Tumors Is Ciprofloxacin a Substrate of P-glycoprotein? Hydrocortisone Diffusion Through Synthetic Membrane, Mouse Skin, and Epiderm™ Cultured Skin. The Dose Proportionality of Telcagepant after Administration of Single Oral and Intravenous Doses in Healthy Adult Subjects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1