{"title":"内插法在腕管综合征诊断中的应用研究及与掌心抗皮感觉法的比较。","authors":"M H Bahrami, S M Rayegani, F Nouri","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common focal compression neuropathy. There are a significant number of different methods available to evaluate a patient for median nerve compromise at the carpal tunnel. One of them is interpolation method created by Dr E.B. Bodofski. In our study Sensitivity of interpolation method was 85.5%, Specificity was 85%, Positive predictive value was 94.6% and Negative predictive value was 65.4%. These results are lower than Dr Bodofski results. Also in our study sensitivity of midpalm antidromic sensory method was 95.1%, Specificity was 95%, Positive predictive value was 98.3% and Negative predictive value was 86.4%, these results are higher than results of interpolation method. These show interpolation method is a good method (with high sensitivity & specificity) for diagnosis of mild CTS, but it's sensitivity & specificity are lower than antideromic sensory stimulation method at wrist & midpalm.</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"49 6-7","pages":"259-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of interpolation method in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and comparison with midpalm antideromic sensory method.\",\"authors\":\"M H Bahrami, S M Rayegani, F Nouri\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common focal compression neuropathy. There are a significant number of different methods available to evaluate a patient for median nerve compromise at the carpal tunnel. One of them is interpolation method created by Dr E.B. Bodofski. In our study Sensitivity of interpolation method was 85.5%, Specificity was 85%, Positive predictive value was 94.6% and Negative predictive value was 65.4%. These results are lower than Dr Bodofski results. Also in our study sensitivity of midpalm antidromic sensory method was 95.1%, Specificity was 95%, Positive predictive value was 98.3% and Negative predictive value was 86.4%, these results are higher than results of interpolation method. These show interpolation method is a good method (with high sensitivity & specificity) for diagnosis of mild CTS, but it's sensitivity & specificity are lower than antideromic sensory stimulation method at wrist & midpalm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"49 6-7\",\"pages\":\"259-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Study of interpolation method in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and comparison with midpalm antideromic sensory method.
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common focal compression neuropathy. There are a significant number of different methods available to evaluate a patient for median nerve compromise at the carpal tunnel. One of them is interpolation method created by Dr E.B. Bodofski. In our study Sensitivity of interpolation method was 85.5%, Specificity was 85%, Positive predictive value was 94.6% and Negative predictive value was 65.4%. These results are lower than Dr Bodofski results. Also in our study sensitivity of midpalm antidromic sensory method was 95.1%, Specificity was 95%, Positive predictive value was 98.3% and Negative predictive value was 86.4%, these results are higher than results of interpolation method. These show interpolation method is a good method (with high sensitivity & specificity) for diagnosis of mild CTS, but it's sensitivity & specificity are lower than antideromic sensory stimulation method at wrist & midpalm.