骑自行车和不骑自行车的人蹬车的效率和肌肉的补充都随着节奏的增加而提高。

J L Dantas, B P C Smirmaul, L R Altimari, A H Okano, E B Fontes, T V Camata, A C Moraes
{"title":"骑自行车和不骑自行车的人蹬车的效率和肌肉的补充都随着节奏的增加而提高。","authors":"J L Dantas,&nbsp;B P C Smirmaul,&nbsp;L R Altimari,&nbsp;A H Okano,&nbsp;E B Fontes,&nbsp;T V Camata,&nbsp;A C Moraes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of pedaling (EP) and the electromyographic activity (EMG) between cyclists and non-cyclists during cycling in different cadences. Using a cyclosimulator, 12 cyclists (26.5 +/- 4.5 years; 68.2 +/- 10.5 kg; 175.6 +/- 8.2 cm) and 9 non-cyclists (25.1 +/- 4.3 years; 72.6 +/- 9.8 kg; 174.6 +/- 6.2 cm), performed a maximum incremental test (ITmax), and subsequently, two constant load tests (Tconst) in different cadences (60 and 90 rpm) at the intensity of the electromyographic fatigue threshold (EMGth) determined in ITmax. Before the Tconst, the subjects performed a maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) for the normalization of the EMG data of Tconst. During Tconst, the EMG of the studied muscles was recorded, as well as the EP Although there was a trend of higher values in all occasions for the cyclists, there were no statistical differences in EP and the EMG when compared in a same cadence between groups. However, when the EMG is compared in different cadences in the same group, there was a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the muscles that work during the recovery phase with the increase in cadence, in both groups, being more evident in the cyclists. In conclusion, the hypothesis that cyclists had better technique than non-cyclists was not confirmed statistically. However, it was found that the increase in cadence improves the EP and the recruitment in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"49 6-7","pages":"311-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficiency of pedaling and the muscular recruitment are improved with increase of the cadence in cyclists and non-cyclists.\",\"authors\":\"J L Dantas,&nbsp;B P C Smirmaul,&nbsp;L R Altimari,&nbsp;A H Okano,&nbsp;E B Fontes,&nbsp;T V Camata,&nbsp;A C Moraes\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of pedaling (EP) and the electromyographic activity (EMG) between cyclists and non-cyclists during cycling in different cadences. Using a cyclosimulator, 12 cyclists (26.5 +/- 4.5 years; 68.2 +/- 10.5 kg; 175.6 +/- 8.2 cm) and 9 non-cyclists (25.1 +/- 4.3 years; 72.6 +/- 9.8 kg; 174.6 +/- 6.2 cm), performed a maximum incremental test (ITmax), and subsequently, two constant load tests (Tconst) in different cadences (60 and 90 rpm) at the intensity of the electromyographic fatigue threshold (EMGth) determined in ITmax. Before the Tconst, the subjects performed a maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) for the normalization of the EMG data of Tconst. During Tconst, the EMG of the studied muscles was recorded, as well as the EP Although there was a trend of higher values in all occasions for the cyclists, there were no statistical differences in EP and the EMG when compared in a same cadence between groups. However, when the EMG is compared in different cadences in the same group, there was a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the muscles that work during the recovery phase with the increase in cadence, in both groups, being more evident in the cyclists. In conclusion, the hypothesis that cyclists had better technique than non-cyclists was not confirmed statistically. However, it was found that the increase in cadence improves the EP and the recruitment in both groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"49 6-7\",\"pages\":\"311-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较骑自行车和不骑自行车的人在不同节奏下蹬车的效率和肌电活动。使用自行车模拟器,12名骑行者(26.5 +/- 4.5岁;68.2 +/- 10.5 kg;175.6 +/- 8.2厘米)和9名非骑自行车者(25.1 +/- 4.3岁;72.6 +/- 9.8 kg;174.6 +/- 6.2 cm),进行最大增量试验(ITmax),随后,在ITmax确定的肌电疲劳阈值(EMGth)强度下,以不同的节奏(60和90 rpm)进行两次恒定负荷试验(Tconst)。实验前进行最大等距自主收缩(maximum isometric voluntary contraction, MIVC),对肌电数据进行归一化处理。在Tconst期间,研究肌肉的肌电图和肌电图都被记录下来,尽管骑车者在所有场合都有较高的趋势,但在相同节奏下,两组之间的肌电图和肌电图没有统计学差异。然而,当比较同一组不同节奏下的肌电图时,在两组中,随着节奏的增加,在恢复阶段工作的肌肉显著增加(p < 0.05),在骑自行车的人中更为明显。总之,骑自行车的人比不骑自行车的人技术更好的假设在统计上没有得到证实。然而,我们发现节奏的增加改善了两组的EP和招募。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficiency of pedaling and the muscular recruitment are improved with increase of the cadence in cyclists and non-cyclists.

The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of pedaling (EP) and the electromyographic activity (EMG) between cyclists and non-cyclists during cycling in different cadences. Using a cyclosimulator, 12 cyclists (26.5 +/- 4.5 years; 68.2 +/- 10.5 kg; 175.6 +/- 8.2 cm) and 9 non-cyclists (25.1 +/- 4.3 years; 72.6 +/- 9.8 kg; 174.6 +/- 6.2 cm), performed a maximum incremental test (ITmax), and subsequently, two constant load tests (Tconst) in different cadences (60 and 90 rpm) at the intensity of the electromyographic fatigue threshold (EMGth) determined in ITmax. Before the Tconst, the subjects performed a maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) for the normalization of the EMG data of Tconst. During Tconst, the EMG of the studied muscles was recorded, as well as the EP Although there was a trend of higher values in all occasions for the cyclists, there were no statistical differences in EP and the EMG when compared in a same cadence between groups. However, when the EMG is compared in different cadences in the same group, there was a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the muscles that work during the recovery phase with the increase in cadence, in both groups, being more evident in the cyclists. In conclusion, the hypothesis that cyclists had better technique than non-cyclists was not confirmed statistically. However, it was found that the increase in cadence improves the EP and the recruitment in both groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of gender on the EMG signal of the quadriceps femoris muscles and performance in high-intensity short-term exercise. Activity and asymmetry index of masticatory muscles in women with and without dysfunction temporomandibular. Scientific basis for learning transfer from movements to urinary bladder functions for bladder repair in human patients with CNS injury. Common peroneal and tibial nerve paralysis secondary to herpes zoster infection: a case report. The effect of provocative tests on electrodiagnosis criteria in clinical carpal tunnel syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1