手术切除边缘不影响皮肤黑色素瘤患者健康相关的生活质量或情绪困扰:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果

Mia Bergenmar, Eva Månsson-Brahme, Johan Hansson, Yvonne Brandberg
{"title":"手术切除边缘不影响皮肤黑色素瘤患者健康相关的生活质量或情绪困扰:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果","authors":"Mia Bergenmar,&nbsp;Eva Månsson-Brahme,&nbsp;Johan Hansson,&nbsp;Yvonne Brandberg","doi":"10.3109/02844311003791136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a prospective randomised Scandinavian trial, patients with localised invasive cutaneous melanoma of the trunk or extremities with tumours more than 2 mm thick were randomly assigned to excision with narrow (2 cm) or wide (4 cm) margins after primary surgery. The aims of the present study were to find out if there were any differences in health-related quality of life (QoL) and emotional distress between patients in the two arms over time. Patients were assessed at four time points: before randomisation, and at 3, 9, and 15 months after inclusion, using the EORTC QLQ-C30, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Impact of Event Scale. A study-specific questionnaire was used to assess patient-reported problems related to the scar. A total of 144 patients were included; 70 randomised to narrow excision and 74 to wide excision margins. The response rate was >85% at all assessment points. No differences between the two arms were found for health-related QoL or emotional distress. Emotional functioning, insomnia, anxiety, intrusion, and avoidance improved over time (p <or= 0.0001). Thirty patients (32%) reported problems with the scar but there was no difference between the two arms. No differences in health-related QoL or emotional distress were found between the two arms, indicating that resection margins have limited impact on these variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":49569,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":"44 3","pages":"146-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/02844311003791136","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical resection margins do not influence health related quality of life or emotional distress in patients with cutaneous melanoma: results of a prospective randomised trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mia Bergenmar,&nbsp;Eva Månsson-Brahme,&nbsp;Johan Hansson,&nbsp;Yvonne Brandberg\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/02844311003791136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a prospective randomised Scandinavian trial, patients with localised invasive cutaneous melanoma of the trunk or extremities with tumours more than 2 mm thick were randomly assigned to excision with narrow (2 cm) or wide (4 cm) margins after primary surgery. The aims of the present study were to find out if there were any differences in health-related quality of life (QoL) and emotional distress between patients in the two arms over time. Patients were assessed at four time points: before randomisation, and at 3, 9, and 15 months after inclusion, using the EORTC QLQ-C30, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Impact of Event Scale. A study-specific questionnaire was used to assess patient-reported problems related to the scar. A total of 144 patients were included; 70 randomised to narrow excision and 74 to wide excision margins. The response rate was >85% at all assessment points. No differences between the two arms were found for health-related QoL or emotional distress. Emotional functioning, insomnia, anxiety, intrusion, and avoidance improved over time (p <or= 0.0001). Thirty patients (32%) reported problems with the scar but there was no difference between the two arms. No differences in health-related QoL or emotional distress were found between the two arms, indicating that resection margins have limited impact on these variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"146-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/02844311003791136\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/02844311003791136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/02844311003791136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在斯堪的纳维亚的一项前瞻性随机试验中,肿瘤厚度大于2mm的躯干或四肢局部浸润性皮肤黑色素瘤患者在初次手术后被随机分配到窄(2厘米)或宽(4厘米)的切除组。本研究的目的是发现两组患者在健康相关生活质量(QoL)和情绪困扰方面是否存在任何差异。采用EORTC QLQ-C30、医院焦虑抑郁量表和事件影响量表,在随机化前、纳入后3、9和15个月四个时间点对患者进行评估。一份研究专用问卷用于评估患者报告的与疤痕相关的问题。共纳入144例患者;70人随机选择窄切除,74人随机选择宽切除。所有评估点的有效率均>85%。两组在健康相关的生活质量或情绪困扰方面没有发现差异。情绪功能、失眠、焦虑、干扰和回避随着时间的推移而改善
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surgical resection margins do not influence health related quality of life or emotional distress in patients with cutaneous melanoma: results of a prospective randomised trial.

In a prospective randomised Scandinavian trial, patients with localised invasive cutaneous melanoma of the trunk or extremities with tumours more than 2 mm thick were randomly assigned to excision with narrow (2 cm) or wide (4 cm) margins after primary surgery. The aims of the present study were to find out if there were any differences in health-related quality of life (QoL) and emotional distress between patients in the two arms over time. Patients were assessed at four time points: before randomisation, and at 3, 9, and 15 months after inclusion, using the EORTC QLQ-C30, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Impact of Event Scale. A study-specific questionnaire was used to assess patient-reported problems related to the scar. A total of 144 patients were included; 70 randomised to narrow excision and 74 to wide excision margins. The response rate was >85% at all assessment points. No differences between the two arms were found for health-related QoL or emotional distress. Emotional functioning, insomnia, anxiety, intrusion, and avoidance improved over time (p

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New method of tunnelling for omental transposition in the treatment of a complex radionecrotic groin ulcer. Injection injury caused by puncture of the nozzle of a spray can. Successful management of tracheoinnominate artery fistula using a split pectoralis muscle flap with anatomical reconstruction by a synthetic graft. Quality of life after breast reconstruction: comparison of three methods. Surgical resection margins do not influence health related quality of life or emotional distress in patients with cutaneous melanoma: results of a prospective randomised trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1