Lawrence Macdonald, John Edwards, Thomas Lewellen, James Rogers, Paul Kinahan
{"title":"PEM Flex Solo正电子放射乳房x线摄影的临床影像特征。","authors":"Lawrence Macdonald, John Edwards, Thomas Lewellen, James Rogers, Paul Kinahan","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Positron emission mammography (PEM) uses two opposing gamma-ray imagers and limited-angle tomography techniques to image radiotracer distributions within the breast. Due to their smaller size and closer proximity to the source, dedicated PEM cameras can provide better spatial resolution and count sensitivity than whole-body positron emission tomographs. We performed several clinical imaging tests on a commercially available PEM camera, the PEM Flex Solo II. This system is comprised of two opposing 6 cm × 16.4 cm detectors that scan in unison to cover up to a 24 cm × 16.4 cm field of view (FOV). We measured spatial resolution, uniformity, recovery coefficients (RC), and quantification using the system clinical software. Image linearity and coefficient of variation (CV) at the edge of the FOV were also characterized. Anecdotal examples of clinical patient data are presented. Spatial resolution is 2.4 mm FWHM for image planes parallel to the detector faces; background variability is 6%; quantification and RC varied within the FOV; positioning linearity began at ~ 13 mm from the edge of the detector housing; CV increased rapidly at the edge of the FOV due to limited sampling in these image planes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73298,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium","volume":"11 2008","pages":"4494-4501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774291","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography PEM Flex Solo II.\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence Macdonald, John Edwards, Thomas Lewellen, James Rogers, Paul Kinahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Positron emission mammography (PEM) uses two opposing gamma-ray imagers and limited-angle tomography techniques to image radiotracer distributions within the breast. Due to their smaller size and closer proximity to the source, dedicated PEM cameras can provide better spatial resolution and count sensitivity than whole-body positron emission tomographs. We performed several clinical imaging tests on a commercially available PEM camera, the PEM Flex Solo II. This system is comprised of two opposing 6 cm × 16.4 cm detectors that scan in unison to cover up to a 24 cm × 16.4 cm field of view (FOV). We measured spatial resolution, uniformity, recovery coefficients (RC), and quantification using the system clinical software. Image linearity and coefficient of variation (CV) at the edge of the FOV were also characterized. Anecdotal examples of clinical patient data are presented. Spatial resolution is 2.4 mm FWHM for image planes parallel to the detector faces; background variability is 6%; quantification and RC varied within the FOV; positioning linearity began at ~ 13 mm from the edge of the detector housing; CV increased rapidly at the edge of the FOV due to limited sampling in these image planes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium\",\"volume\":\"11 2008\",\"pages\":\"4494-4501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774291\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27
摘要
正电子发射乳房x线照相术(PEM)使用两个相对的伽马射线成像仪和有限角度断层扫描技术来成像乳房内的放射性示踪剂分布。由于其体积更小,距离源更近,专用PEM相机可以提供比全身正电子发射层析成像更好的空间分辨率和计数灵敏度。我们在市售的PEM Flex Solo II相机上进行了几次临床成像测试。该系统由两个相对的6厘米× 16.4厘米的探测器组成,它们同步扫描以覆盖24厘米× 16.4厘米的视场(FOV)。我们使用系统临床软件测量了空间分辨率、均匀性、恢复系数(RC)和定量。对视场边缘的图像线性度和变异系数(CV)进行了表征。临床病人数据的轶事例子提出。平行于探测器面像面的空间分辨率为2.4 mm FWHM;背景变异性为6%;量化和RC在视场范围内变化;定位线性度从探测器外壳边缘~ 13mm处开始;由于在这些图像平面上采样有限,CV在视场边缘迅速增加。
Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography PEM Flex Solo II.
Positron emission mammography (PEM) uses two opposing gamma-ray imagers and limited-angle tomography techniques to image radiotracer distributions within the breast. Due to their smaller size and closer proximity to the source, dedicated PEM cameras can provide better spatial resolution and count sensitivity than whole-body positron emission tomographs. We performed several clinical imaging tests on a commercially available PEM camera, the PEM Flex Solo II. This system is comprised of two opposing 6 cm × 16.4 cm detectors that scan in unison to cover up to a 24 cm × 16.4 cm field of view (FOV). We measured spatial resolution, uniformity, recovery coefficients (RC), and quantification using the system clinical software. Image linearity and coefficient of variation (CV) at the edge of the FOV were also characterized. Anecdotal examples of clinical patient data are presented. Spatial resolution is 2.4 mm FWHM for image planes parallel to the detector faces; background variability is 6%; quantification and RC varied within the FOV; positioning linearity began at ~ 13 mm from the edge of the detector housing; CV increased rapidly at the edge of the FOV due to limited sampling in these image planes.