皮疹后再次使用拉莫三嗪:前瞻性病例系列和文献回顾。

Chris B Aiken, Carolyn Orr
{"title":"皮疹后再次使用拉莫三嗪:前瞻性病例系列和文献回顾。","authors":"Chris B Aiken,&nbsp;Carolyn Orr","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the safety of rechallenge with lamotrigine after an initial rash in patients with refractory bipolar depression.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>1) Prospective, open-label case series in a private practice setting. Patients who developed an initial rash on lamotrigine and were refractory to other treatments were offered rechallenge with the drug using very-low-dose titration (5mg every other day or daily for 14 days, then raised every 14 days by daily-dose increments of 5mg; after 25mg/day the titration proceeded according to the manufacturer's guidelines); and 2) A meta-analysis of prior reports of rechallenge with lamotrigine was conducted.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>A rating scale for rash severity was developed for this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 27 patients rechallenged with lamotrigine, five required discontinuation due to rash or inflammation. Two of these were potentially serious and all resolved with discontinuation of lamotrigine. Review of the literature identified 48 cases of lamotrigine rechallenge with a success rate of 87 percent; in pooled analysis with the current study the success rate was 85 percent. No patients developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis after rechallenge. The rate of rash was elevated when rechallenge began within four weeks of the initial rash (36% vs. 7%, p=0.002) and reduced when the initial rash had no signs of potential seriousness (0% vs. 23%, p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rechallenge is a viable option after a benign rash on lamotrigine and can be undertaken with more caution after rashes with 1 to 2 signs of potential seriousness. For rashes with three or more signs of seriousness, rechallenge is not well-studied and may carry significant risk. Rechallenge should be avoided within four weeks of the initial rash.</p>","PeriodicalId":20822,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township))","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882280/pdf/PE_7_5_27.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rechallenge with lamotrigine after a rash: a prospective case series and review of the literature.\",\"authors\":\"Chris B Aiken,&nbsp;Carolyn Orr\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the safety of rechallenge with lamotrigine after an initial rash in patients with refractory bipolar depression.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>1) Prospective, open-label case series in a private practice setting. Patients who developed an initial rash on lamotrigine and were refractory to other treatments were offered rechallenge with the drug using very-low-dose titration (5mg every other day or daily for 14 days, then raised every 14 days by daily-dose increments of 5mg; after 25mg/day the titration proceeded according to the manufacturer's guidelines); and 2) A meta-analysis of prior reports of rechallenge with lamotrigine was conducted.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>A rating scale for rash severity was developed for this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 27 patients rechallenged with lamotrigine, five required discontinuation due to rash or inflammation. Two of these were potentially serious and all resolved with discontinuation of lamotrigine. Review of the literature identified 48 cases of lamotrigine rechallenge with a success rate of 87 percent; in pooled analysis with the current study the success rate was 85 percent. No patients developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis after rechallenge. The rate of rash was elevated when rechallenge began within four weeks of the initial rash (36% vs. 7%, p=0.002) and reduced when the initial rash had no signs of potential seriousness (0% vs. 23%, p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rechallenge is a viable option after a benign rash on lamotrigine and can be undertaken with more caution after rashes with 1 to 2 signs of potential seriousness. For rashes with three or more signs of seriousness, rechallenge is not well-studied and may carry significant risk. Rechallenge should be avoided within four weeks of the initial rash.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township))\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882280/pdf/PE_7_5_27.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township))\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨难治性双相抑郁症患者初发皮疹后再用拉莫三嗪的安全性。设计:1)前瞻性,开放标签的案例系列在私人执业设置。最初使用拉莫三嗪出现皮疹且对其他治疗方法难治性的患者使用极低剂量滴定(每隔一天5mg或每天5mg,持续14天,然后每14天增加5mg的剂量;在25mg/天之后,按照制造商的指南进行滴定);2)对拉莫三嗪再挑战的既往报告进行meta分析。测量方法:本研究制定了皮疹严重程度评分量表。结果:27例患者再次使用拉莫三嗪,5例因皮疹或炎症需要停药。其中2例可能很严重,均通过停用拉莫三嗪解决。回顾文献发现48例拉莫三嗪再灌注,成功率为87%;在当前研究的汇总分析中,成功率为85%。再挑战后没有患者出现史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征或中毒性表皮坏死松解。当初次皮疹后4周内再次出现皮疹时,皮疹发生率升高(36% vs. 7%, p=0.002),当初次皮疹没有潜在严重性迹象时,皮疹发生率降低(0% vs. 23%, p=0.01)。结论:在使用拉莫三嗪出现良性皮疹后,再挑战是一种可行的选择,在出现1 - 2个潜在严重症状的皮疹后,应更加谨慎。对于有三个或更多严重迹象的皮疹,重新挑战没有得到充分研究,可能会带来重大风险。应避免在最初的皮疹后四周内再次挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rechallenge with lamotrigine after a rash: a prospective case series and review of the literature.

Objective: To investigate the safety of rechallenge with lamotrigine after an initial rash in patients with refractory bipolar depression.

Design: 1) Prospective, open-label case series in a private practice setting. Patients who developed an initial rash on lamotrigine and were refractory to other treatments were offered rechallenge with the drug using very-low-dose titration (5mg every other day or daily for 14 days, then raised every 14 days by daily-dose increments of 5mg; after 25mg/day the titration proceeded according to the manufacturer's guidelines); and 2) A meta-analysis of prior reports of rechallenge with lamotrigine was conducted.

Measures: A rating scale for rash severity was developed for this study.

Results: Of 27 patients rechallenged with lamotrigine, five required discontinuation due to rash or inflammation. Two of these were potentially serious and all resolved with discontinuation of lamotrigine. Review of the literature identified 48 cases of lamotrigine rechallenge with a success rate of 87 percent; in pooled analysis with the current study the success rate was 85 percent. No patients developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis after rechallenge. The rate of rash was elevated when rechallenge began within four weeks of the initial rash (36% vs. 7%, p=0.002) and reduced when the initial rash had no signs of potential seriousness (0% vs. 23%, p=0.01).

Conclusions: Rechallenge is a viable option after a benign rash on lamotrigine and can be undertaken with more caution after rashes with 1 to 2 signs of potential seriousness. For rashes with three or more signs of seriousness, rechallenge is not well-studied and may carry significant risk. Rechallenge should be avoided within four weeks of the initial rash.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meow meow or miaow miaow: a new drug of concern. Medical disability and pain medication prescription among internal medicine outpatients. A review of new atypical antipsychotic launches in the United States. Psychiatric disorders: a global look at facts and figures. The blood brain barrier and the role of ratiometric molecular analysis in schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1