负重运动中臀中肌三个分支的肌电图分析。

Kieran O'Sullivan, Sharon M Smith, David Sainsbury
{"title":"负重运动中臀中肌三个分支的肌电图分析。","authors":"Kieran O'Sullivan,&nbsp;Sharon M Smith,&nbsp;David Sainsbury","doi":"10.1186/1758-2555-2-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gluteus medius (GM) dysfunction is associated with many musculoskeletal disorders. Rehabilitation exercises aimed at strengthening GM appear to improve lower limb kinematics and reduce pain. However, there is a lack of evidence to identify which exercises best activate GM. In particular, as GM consists of three distinct subdivisions, it is unclear if GM activation is consistent across these subdivisions during exercise. The aim of this study was to determine the activation of the anterior, middle and posterior subdivisions of GM during weight-bearing exercises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single session, repeated-measures design. The activity of each GM subdivision was measured in 15 pain-free subjects using surface electromyography (sEMG) during three weight-bearing exercises; wall squat (WS), pelvic drop (PD) and wall press (WP). Muscle activity was expressed relative to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Differences in muscle activation were determined using one-way repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The activation of each GM subdivision during the exercises was significantly different (interaction effect; p < 0.001). There were also significant main effects for muscle subdivision (p < 0.001) and for exercise (p < 0.001). The exercises were progressively more demanding from WS to PD to WP. The exercises caused significantly greater activation of the middle and posterior subdivisions than the anterior subdivision, with the WP significantly increasing the activation of the posterior subdivision (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Posterior GM displayed higher activation across all three exercises than both anterior and middle GM. The WP produced the highest %MVIC activation for all GM subdivisions, and this was most pronounced for posterior GM. Clinicians may use these results to effectively progress strengthening exercises for GM in the rehabilitation of lower extremity injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":88316,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT","volume":"2 ","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-2555-2-17","citationCount":"82","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electromyographic analysis of the three subdivisions of gluteus medius during weight-bearing exercises.\",\"authors\":\"Kieran O'Sullivan,&nbsp;Sharon M Smith,&nbsp;David Sainsbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1758-2555-2-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gluteus medius (GM) dysfunction is associated with many musculoskeletal disorders. Rehabilitation exercises aimed at strengthening GM appear to improve lower limb kinematics and reduce pain. However, there is a lack of evidence to identify which exercises best activate GM. In particular, as GM consists of three distinct subdivisions, it is unclear if GM activation is consistent across these subdivisions during exercise. The aim of this study was to determine the activation of the anterior, middle and posterior subdivisions of GM during weight-bearing exercises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single session, repeated-measures design. The activity of each GM subdivision was measured in 15 pain-free subjects using surface electromyography (sEMG) during three weight-bearing exercises; wall squat (WS), pelvic drop (PD) and wall press (WP). Muscle activity was expressed relative to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Differences in muscle activation were determined using one-way repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The activation of each GM subdivision during the exercises was significantly different (interaction effect; p < 0.001). There were also significant main effects for muscle subdivision (p < 0.001) and for exercise (p < 0.001). The exercises were progressively more demanding from WS to PD to WP. The exercises caused significantly greater activation of the middle and posterior subdivisions than the anterior subdivision, with the WP significantly increasing the activation of the posterior subdivision (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Posterior GM displayed higher activation across all three exercises than both anterior and middle GM. The WP produced the highest %MVIC activation for all GM subdivisions, and this was most pronounced for posterior GM. Clinicians may use these results to effectively progress strengthening exercises for GM in the rehabilitation of lower extremity injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-2555-2-17\",\"citationCount\":\"82\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-2-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-2-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

摘要

背景:臀中肌功能障碍与许多肌肉骨骼疾病有关。旨在增强GM的康复训练似乎可以改善下肢运动学并减轻疼痛。然而,缺乏证据来确定哪种运动最能激活GM。特别是,由于GM由三个不同的细分组成,尚不清楚在运动过程中,这些细分之间的GM激活是否一致。本研究的目的是确定负重运动过程中GM前、中、后分区的激活情况。方法:单疗程、重复措施设计。在三次负重运动中,使用表面肌电图(sEMG)测量了15名无痛受试者的每个GM细分的活动;壁深蹲(WS)、骨盆下垂(PD)和壁按压(WP)。肌肉活动是相对于最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)来表达的。使用单向重复测量ANOVA和事后Bonferroni分析来确定肌肉激活的差异。结果:运动过程中每个GM细分的激活有显著差异(交互作用;p<0.001)。肌肉细分(p<0.001)和运动(p<0.001)也有显著的主要影响。从WS到PD再到WP,运动要求越来越高。运动引起的中、后分区的激活明显大于前分区,WP显著增加了后分区的活化(均p<0.05)。讨论:后GM在所有三种运动中都比前、中GM表现出更高的活化。WP在所有GM细分中产生了最高的%MVIC激活,这在后部GM中最为明显。临床医生可以利用这些结果在下肢损伤的康复中有效地推进GM的强化运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electromyographic analysis of the three subdivisions of gluteus medius during weight-bearing exercises.

Background: Gluteus medius (GM) dysfunction is associated with many musculoskeletal disorders. Rehabilitation exercises aimed at strengthening GM appear to improve lower limb kinematics and reduce pain. However, there is a lack of evidence to identify which exercises best activate GM. In particular, as GM consists of three distinct subdivisions, it is unclear if GM activation is consistent across these subdivisions during exercise. The aim of this study was to determine the activation of the anterior, middle and posterior subdivisions of GM during weight-bearing exercises.

Methods: A single session, repeated-measures design. The activity of each GM subdivision was measured in 15 pain-free subjects using surface electromyography (sEMG) during three weight-bearing exercises; wall squat (WS), pelvic drop (PD) and wall press (WP). Muscle activity was expressed relative to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Differences in muscle activation were determined using one-way repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni analysis.

Results: The activation of each GM subdivision during the exercises was significantly different (interaction effect; p < 0.001). There were also significant main effects for muscle subdivision (p < 0.001) and for exercise (p < 0.001). The exercises were progressively more demanding from WS to PD to WP. The exercises caused significantly greater activation of the middle and posterior subdivisions than the anterior subdivision, with the WP significantly increasing the activation of the posterior subdivision (all p < 0.05).

Discussion: Posterior GM displayed higher activation across all three exercises than both anterior and middle GM. The WP produced the highest %MVIC activation for all GM subdivisions, and this was most pronounced for posterior GM. Clinicians may use these results to effectively progress strengthening exercises for GM in the rehabilitation of lower extremity injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment of stress fracture of the olecranon in throwing athletes with internal fixation through a small incision. Management of degenerative rotator cuff tears: a review and treatment strategy. A variant of a type V lateral clavicle fracture involving a posteriorly displaced medial segment. A case report. Contralateral anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case controlled study. Coordinative variability and overuse injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1