工人补偿和非补偿患者膝关节伸展丧失的高强度机械治疗。

Amanda L Dempsey, Thomas P Branch, Timothy Mills, Robert M Karsch
{"title":"工人补偿和非补偿患者膝关节伸展丧失的高强度机械治疗。","authors":"Amanda L Dempsey,&nbsp;Thomas P Branch,&nbsp;Timothy Mills,&nbsp;Robert M Karsch","doi":"10.1186/1758-2555-2-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee flexion contractures have been associated with increased pain and a reduced ability to perform activities of daily living. Contractures can be treated either surgically or conservatively, but these treatment options may not be as successful with worker's compensation patients. The purposes of retrospective review were to 1) determine the efficacy of using adjunctive high-intensity stretch (HIS) mechanical therapy to treat flexion contractures, and 2) compare the results between groups of worker's compensation and non-compensation patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-six patients (19 women, 37 men, age = 51.5 ± 17.0 years) with flexion contractures were treated with HIS mechanical therapy as an adjunct to outpatient physical therapy. Mechanical therapy was only prescribed for those patients whose motion had reached a plateau when treated with physical therapy alone. Patients were asked to perform six, 10-minute bouts of end-range stretching per day with the ERMI Knee Extensionater(r) (ERMI, Inc., Atlanta, GA). Passive knee extension was recorded during the postoperative visit that mechanical therapy was prescribed, 3 months after beginning mechanical therapy, and at the most recent follow-up. We used a mixed-model 2 × 3 ANOVA (group × time) to evaluate the change in passive knee extension between groups over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regardless of group, the use of adjunctive HIS mechanical therapy resulted in passive knee extension deficits that significantly improved from 10.5° ± 5.2° at the initial visit to 2.6° ± 3.5° at the 3 month visit (p < 0.001). The degree of extension was maintained at the most recent follow-up (2.0° ± 2.9°), which was significantly greater than the initial visit (p < 0.001), but did not differ from the 3 month visit (p = 0.23). The gains in knee extension did not differ between worker's compensation and non-compensation patients (p = 0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that the adjunctive use of HIS mechanical therapy is an effective treatment option for patients with knee flexion contractures, regardless of whether the patient is being treated as part of a worker's compensation claim or not.</p>","PeriodicalId":88316,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT","volume":"2 ","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-2555-2-26","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-intensity mechanical therapy for loss of knee extension for worker's compensation and non-compensation patients.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda L Dempsey,&nbsp;Thomas P Branch,&nbsp;Timothy Mills,&nbsp;Robert M Karsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1758-2555-2-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee flexion contractures have been associated with increased pain and a reduced ability to perform activities of daily living. Contractures can be treated either surgically or conservatively, but these treatment options may not be as successful with worker's compensation patients. The purposes of retrospective review were to 1) determine the efficacy of using adjunctive high-intensity stretch (HIS) mechanical therapy to treat flexion contractures, and 2) compare the results between groups of worker's compensation and non-compensation patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-six patients (19 women, 37 men, age = 51.5 ± 17.0 years) with flexion contractures were treated with HIS mechanical therapy as an adjunct to outpatient physical therapy. Mechanical therapy was only prescribed for those patients whose motion had reached a plateau when treated with physical therapy alone. Patients were asked to perform six, 10-minute bouts of end-range stretching per day with the ERMI Knee Extensionater(r) (ERMI, Inc., Atlanta, GA). Passive knee extension was recorded during the postoperative visit that mechanical therapy was prescribed, 3 months after beginning mechanical therapy, and at the most recent follow-up. We used a mixed-model 2 × 3 ANOVA (group × time) to evaluate the change in passive knee extension between groups over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regardless of group, the use of adjunctive HIS mechanical therapy resulted in passive knee extension deficits that significantly improved from 10.5° ± 5.2° at the initial visit to 2.6° ± 3.5° at the 3 month visit (p < 0.001). The degree of extension was maintained at the most recent follow-up (2.0° ± 2.9°), which was significantly greater than the initial visit (p < 0.001), but did not differ from the 3 month visit (p = 0.23). The gains in knee extension did not differ between worker's compensation and non-compensation patients (p = 0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that the adjunctive use of HIS mechanical therapy is an effective treatment option for patients with knee flexion contractures, regardless of whether the patient is being treated as part of a worker's compensation claim or not.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-2555-2-26\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-2-26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-2-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

背景:膝关节屈曲挛缩与疼痛增加和日常生活活动能力下降有关。挛缩可以手术或保守治疗,但这些治疗方案可能不像工人赔偿患者那样成功。回顾性回顾的目的是:1)确定使用辅助高强度拉伸(HIS)机械疗法治疗屈曲挛缩的疗效;2)比较工伤补偿组和非工伤补偿组患者的结果。方法:56例屈曲挛缩患者(女19例,男37例,年龄51.5±17.0岁)采用HIS机械治疗辅助门诊物理治疗。机械疗法只适用于那些运动达到平台期的患者。患者被要求使用ERMI膝关节伸展器(r) (ERMI, Inc., Atlanta, GA)每天进行6次10分钟的末端伸展运动。在开始机械治疗3个月后,以及最近的随访期间,记录术后机械治疗期间的被动膝关节伸展。我们使用混合模型2 × 3方差分析(组×时间)来评估组间被动膝关节伸展随时间的变化。结果:无论在哪个组,使用辅助HIS机械治疗导致被动膝关节伸展缺陷显著改善,从最初访问时的10.5°±5.2°改善到3个月访问时的2.6°±3.5°(p < 0.001)。在最近的随访中,患者的伸直度维持在2.0°±2.9°,显著高于首次随访(p < 0.001),但与第3个月随访时无差异(p = 0.23)。膝关节伸展的增加在工人补偿和非补偿患者之间没有差异(p = 0.56)。结论:我们得出结论,辅助使用HIS机械疗法是膝关节屈曲挛缩患者的有效治疗选择,无论患者是否作为工人赔偿索赔的一部分进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High-intensity mechanical therapy for loss of knee extension for worker's compensation and non-compensation patients.

Background: Knee flexion contractures have been associated with increased pain and a reduced ability to perform activities of daily living. Contractures can be treated either surgically or conservatively, but these treatment options may not be as successful with worker's compensation patients. The purposes of retrospective review were to 1) determine the efficacy of using adjunctive high-intensity stretch (HIS) mechanical therapy to treat flexion contractures, and 2) compare the results between groups of worker's compensation and non-compensation patients.

Methods: Fifty-six patients (19 women, 37 men, age = 51.5 ± 17.0 years) with flexion contractures were treated with HIS mechanical therapy as an adjunct to outpatient physical therapy. Mechanical therapy was only prescribed for those patients whose motion had reached a plateau when treated with physical therapy alone. Patients were asked to perform six, 10-minute bouts of end-range stretching per day with the ERMI Knee Extensionater(r) (ERMI, Inc., Atlanta, GA). Passive knee extension was recorded during the postoperative visit that mechanical therapy was prescribed, 3 months after beginning mechanical therapy, and at the most recent follow-up. We used a mixed-model 2 × 3 ANOVA (group × time) to evaluate the change in passive knee extension between groups over time.

Results: Regardless of group, the use of adjunctive HIS mechanical therapy resulted in passive knee extension deficits that significantly improved from 10.5° ± 5.2° at the initial visit to 2.6° ± 3.5° at the 3 month visit (p < 0.001). The degree of extension was maintained at the most recent follow-up (2.0° ± 2.9°), which was significantly greater than the initial visit (p < 0.001), but did not differ from the 3 month visit (p = 0.23). The gains in knee extension did not differ between worker's compensation and non-compensation patients (p = 0.56).

Conclusions: We conclude that the adjunctive use of HIS mechanical therapy is an effective treatment option for patients with knee flexion contractures, regardless of whether the patient is being treated as part of a worker's compensation claim or not.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment of stress fracture of the olecranon in throwing athletes with internal fixation through a small incision. Management of degenerative rotator cuff tears: a review and treatment strategy. A variant of a type V lateral clavicle fracture involving a posteriorly displaced medial segment. A case report. Contralateral anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case controlled study. Coordinative variability and overuse injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1