Nadine Stephenson, Lars Beckmann, Jenny Chang-Claude
{"title":"致癌物质代谢、吸烟和乳腺癌风险:贝叶斯模型平均方法。","authors":"Nadine Stephenson, Lars Beckmann, Jenny Chang-Claude","doi":"10.1186/1742-5573-7-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standard logistic regression with or without stepwise selection has the disadvantage of not incorporating model uncertainty and the dependency of estimates on the underlying model into the final inference. We explore the use of a Bayes Model Averaging approach as an alternative to analyze the influence of genetic variants, environmental effects and their interactions on disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Logistic regression with and without stepwise selection and Bayes Model Averaging were applied to a population-based case-control study exploring the association of genetic variants in tobacco smoke-related carcinogen pathways with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both regression and Bayes Model Averaging highlighted a significant effect of NAT1*10 on breast cancer, while regression analysis also suggested a significant effect for packyears and for the interaction of packyears and NAT2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bayes Model Averaging allows incorporation of model uncertainty, helps reduce dimensionality and avoids the problem of multiple comparisons. It can be used to incorporate biological information, such as pathway data, into the analysis. As with all Bayesian analysis methods, careful consideration must be given to prior specification.</p>","PeriodicalId":87082,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I","volume":"7 ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1742-5573-7-10","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carcinogen metabolism, cigarette smoking, and breast cancer risk: a Bayes model averaging approach.\",\"authors\":\"Nadine Stephenson, Lars Beckmann, Jenny Chang-Claude\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1742-5573-7-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standard logistic regression with or without stepwise selection has the disadvantage of not incorporating model uncertainty and the dependency of estimates on the underlying model into the final inference. We explore the use of a Bayes Model Averaging approach as an alternative to analyze the influence of genetic variants, environmental effects and their interactions on disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Logistic regression with and without stepwise selection and Bayes Model Averaging were applied to a population-based case-control study exploring the association of genetic variants in tobacco smoke-related carcinogen pathways with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both regression and Bayes Model Averaging highlighted a significant effect of NAT1*10 on breast cancer, while regression analysis also suggested a significant effect for packyears and for the interaction of packyears and NAT2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bayes Model Averaging allows incorporation of model uncertainty, helps reduce dimensionality and avoids the problem of multiple comparisons. It can be used to incorporate biological information, such as pathway data, into the analysis. As with all Bayesian analysis methods, careful consideration must be given to prior specification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1742-5573-7-10\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-7-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-7-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
背景:有或没有逐步选择的标准逻辑回归的缺点是没有将模型不确定性和对潜在模型的估计依赖纳入最终推断。我们探索使用贝叶斯模型平均方法作为分析遗传变异、环境影响及其相互作用对疾病的影响的替代方法。方法:采用Logistic回归(有或没有逐步选择)和贝叶斯模型平均(Bayes Model Averaging)进行基于人群的病例对照研究,探讨烟草烟雾相关致癌物通路的遗传变异与乳腺癌的关系。结果:回归分析和贝叶斯模型平均均强调了NAT1*10对乳腺癌的显著影响,而回归分析也表明packyears以及packyears与NAT2的相互作用也有显著影响。结论:贝叶斯模型平均可以考虑模型的不确定性,有助于降低维数,避免多重比较问题。它可以用来将生物信息,如通路数据,纳入分析。与所有贝叶斯分析方法一样,必须仔细考虑事先的规范。
Carcinogen metabolism, cigarette smoking, and breast cancer risk: a Bayes model averaging approach.
Background: Standard logistic regression with or without stepwise selection has the disadvantage of not incorporating model uncertainty and the dependency of estimates on the underlying model into the final inference. We explore the use of a Bayes Model Averaging approach as an alternative to analyze the influence of genetic variants, environmental effects and their interactions on disease.
Methods: Logistic regression with and without stepwise selection and Bayes Model Averaging were applied to a population-based case-control study exploring the association of genetic variants in tobacco smoke-related carcinogen pathways with breast cancer.
Results: Both regression and Bayes Model Averaging highlighted a significant effect of NAT1*10 on breast cancer, while regression analysis also suggested a significant effect for packyears and for the interaction of packyears and NAT2.
Conclusions: Bayes Model Averaging allows incorporation of model uncertainty, helps reduce dimensionality and avoids the problem of multiple comparisons. It can be used to incorporate biological information, such as pathway data, into the analysis. As with all Bayesian analysis methods, careful consideration must be given to prior specification.