血管内支架和线圈治疗椎动脉夹层:其缺陷和技术考虑。

Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2010-10-01 Epub Date: 2011-02-07 DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1269873
A Sadato, S Maeda, M Hayakawa, Y Kato, H Sano, Y Hirose, S Miyamoto, N Hashimoto
{"title":"血管内支架和线圈治疗椎动脉夹层:其缺陷和技术考虑。","authors":"A Sadato,&nbsp;S Maeda,&nbsp;M Hayakawa,&nbsp;Y Kato,&nbsp;H Sano,&nbsp;Y Hirose,&nbsp;S Miyamoto,&nbsp;N Hashimoto","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1269873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are various options for the treatment of vertebral artery dissection aneurysms (VADA). Treatment with stents may be an effective method to treat VADA involving the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) and dissection of the dominant vertebral artery (VA). In this article, our personal experience of the treatment of VADAs by using stents and coils is reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Since 1998, 26 cases of VADA have been treated by endovascular surgery by the first author. Of these cases, 6 cases were treated using stents, 3 of which were treated using stent and coils, 2 patients were treated using double overlapping stents, and the remaining one patient was treated using a single stent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all patients, dissection aneurysms were successfully covered by stents. There was one complication: an intraprocedural rupture during additional coil insertion without neurological deterioration. Follow-up angiography was performed in all 5 surviving patients except for one patient who died due to the severity of his original subarachnoid hemorrhage (mean duration of follow-up angiography 22.8 months, range 15-57 months). Total or subtotal disappearance of the VADA was achieved in all 5 cases. At one year after the treatment, all 5 surviving patients remained clinically stable without any neurological deficit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment using stents is an effective alternative for the treatment of VA dissecting aneurysms, especially for lesions of the dominant VA or involving the PICA. However, additional coil insertion should be performed very carefully and may be avoided if stagnation of contrast material is achieved after overlapping stenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1269873","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular treatment of vertebral artery dissection using stents and coils: its pitfall and technical considerations.\",\"authors\":\"A Sadato,&nbsp;S Maeda,&nbsp;M Hayakawa,&nbsp;Y Kato,&nbsp;H Sano,&nbsp;Y Hirose,&nbsp;S Miyamoto,&nbsp;N Hashimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0030-1269873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are various options for the treatment of vertebral artery dissection aneurysms (VADA). Treatment with stents may be an effective method to treat VADA involving the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) and dissection of the dominant vertebral artery (VA). In this article, our personal experience of the treatment of VADAs by using stents and coils is reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Since 1998, 26 cases of VADA have been treated by endovascular surgery by the first author. Of these cases, 6 cases were treated using stents, 3 of which were treated using stent and coils, 2 patients were treated using double overlapping stents, and the remaining one patient was treated using a single stent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all patients, dissection aneurysms were successfully covered by stents. There was one complication: an intraprocedural rupture during additional coil insertion without neurological deterioration. Follow-up angiography was performed in all 5 surviving patients except for one patient who died due to the severity of his original subarachnoid hemorrhage (mean duration of follow-up angiography 22.8 months, range 15-57 months). Total or subtotal disappearance of the VADA was achieved in all 5 cases. At one year after the treatment, all 5 surviving patients remained clinically stable without any neurological deficit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment using stents is an effective alternative for the treatment of VA dissecting aneurysms, especially for lesions of the dominant VA or involving the PICA. However, additional coil insertion should be performed very carefully and may be avoided if stagnation of contrast material is achieved after overlapping stenting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1269873\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1269873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1269873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

目的:椎动脉夹层动脉瘤(VADA)的治疗有多种选择。支架治疗可能是治疗累及小脑后下动脉(PICA)和优势椎动脉(VA)夹层的VADA的有效方法。本文报告了我们使用支架和线圈治疗VADAs的个人经验。方法:自1998年以来,作者对26例VADA患者行血管内手术治疗。其中6例采用支架治疗,其中3例采用支架+线圈治疗,2例采用双重叠支架治疗,1例采用单支架治疗。结果:所有患者均成功用支架覆盖夹层动脉瘤。有一个并发症:术中在额外线圈插入时破裂,但没有神经功能恶化。除1例患者因原有蛛网膜下腔出血严重程度死亡外,其余5例存活患者均行血管造影随访(血管造影随访平均时间22.8个月,范围15-57个月)。5例患者VADA全部或部分消失。治疗一年后,5例存活患者均保持临床稳定,无任何神经功能障碍。结论:支架治疗是治疗VA夹层动脉瘤的一种有效的替代方法,特别是对于优势VA病变或累及PICA的病变。然而,如果重叠支架植入后造影剂停滞,则应非常小心地插入额外的线圈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endovascular treatment of vertebral artery dissection using stents and coils: its pitfall and technical considerations.

Objective: There are various options for the treatment of vertebral artery dissection aneurysms (VADA). Treatment with stents may be an effective method to treat VADA involving the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) and dissection of the dominant vertebral artery (VA). In this article, our personal experience of the treatment of VADAs by using stents and coils is reported.

Methods: Since 1998, 26 cases of VADA have been treated by endovascular surgery by the first author. Of these cases, 6 cases were treated using stents, 3 of which were treated using stent and coils, 2 patients were treated using double overlapping stents, and the remaining one patient was treated using a single stent.

Results: In all patients, dissection aneurysms were successfully covered by stents. There was one complication: an intraprocedural rupture during additional coil insertion without neurological deterioration. Follow-up angiography was performed in all 5 surviving patients except for one patient who died due to the severity of his original subarachnoid hemorrhage (mean duration of follow-up angiography 22.8 months, range 15-57 months). Total or subtotal disappearance of the VADA was achieved in all 5 cases. At one year after the treatment, all 5 surviving patients remained clinically stable without any neurological deficit.

Conclusions: Treatment using stents is an effective alternative for the treatment of VA dissecting aneurysms, especially for lesions of the dominant VA or involving the PICA. However, additional coil insertion should be performed very carefully and may be avoided if stagnation of contrast material is achieved after overlapping stenting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vidian nerve neurofibroma removed via a transpterygoid approach. Dual, minimally invasive fixation in acute, double, thoracic spine fracture. Massive swelling of Surgicel® Fibrillar™ hemostat after spinal surgery. Case report and a review of the literature. Endoscopic repair of CSF leaks in the postero-superior wall of the frontal sinus - report of 2 cases. Combined staged endoscopic and microsurgical approach of a third ventricular choroid plexus papilloma in an infant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1