Nicole G Chau, Bayardo Perez-Ordonez, Katherine Zhang, Nhu-An Pham, James Ho, Tong Zhang, Olga Ludkovski, Lisa Wang, Eric X Chen, Ming-Sound Tsao, Suzanne Kamel-Reid, Lillian L Siu
{"title":"头颈部复发或转移性鳞状细胞癌患者EGFR变体III、HPV、p16、c-MET、EGFR基因拷贝数与对EGFR抑制剂的反应之间的关系","authors":"Nicole G Chau, Bayardo Perez-Ordonez, Katherine Zhang, Nhu-An Pham, James Ho, Tong Zhang, Olga Ludkovski, Lisa Wang, Eric X Chen, Ming-Sound Tsao, Suzanne Kamel-Reid, Lillian L Siu","doi":"10.1186/1758-3284-3-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We examine the potential prognostic and predictive roles of EGFR variant III mutation, EGFR gene copy number (GCN), human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, c-MET and p16INK4A protein expression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the archival tumor specimens of 53 patients who were treated in 4 phase II trials for R/M SCCHN. Two trials involved the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib, and 2 trials involved non-EGFR targeted agents. EGFRvIII mutation was determined by quantitative RT-PCR, HPV DNA by Linear Array Genotyping, p16 and c-MET protein expression by immunohistochemistry, and EGFR GCN by FISH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EGFRvIII mutation, detected in 22 patients (42%), was associated with better disease control, but no difference was seen between erlotinib-treated versus non-erlotinib treated patients. EGFRvIII was not associated with TTP or OS. The presence of HPV DNA (38%), p16 immunostaining (32%), c-MET high expression (58%) and EGFR amplification (27%), were not associated with response, TTP or OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EGFRvIII mutation, present in about 40% of SCCHN, appears to be an unexpected prognostic biomarker associated with better disease control in R/M SCCHN regardless of treatment with erlotinib. Larger prospective studies are required to validate its significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49195,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society","volume":"3 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-3284-3-11","citationCount":"83","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between EGFR variant III, HPV, p16, c-MET, EGFR gene copy number and response to EGFR inhibitors in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole G Chau, Bayardo Perez-Ordonez, Katherine Zhang, Nhu-An Pham, James Ho, Tong Zhang, Olga Ludkovski, Lisa Wang, Eric X Chen, Ming-Sound Tsao, Suzanne Kamel-Reid, Lillian L Siu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1758-3284-3-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We examine the potential prognostic and predictive roles of EGFR variant III mutation, EGFR gene copy number (GCN), human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, c-MET and p16INK4A protein expression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the archival tumor specimens of 53 patients who were treated in 4 phase II trials for R/M SCCHN. Two trials involved the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib, and 2 trials involved non-EGFR targeted agents. EGFRvIII mutation was determined by quantitative RT-PCR, HPV DNA by Linear Array Genotyping, p16 and c-MET protein expression by immunohistochemistry, and EGFR GCN by FISH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EGFRvIII mutation, detected in 22 patients (42%), was associated with better disease control, but no difference was seen between erlotinib-treated versus non-erlotinib treated patients. EGFRvIII was not associated with TTP or OS. The presence of HPV DNA (38%), p16 immunostaining (32%), c-MET high expression (58%) and EGFR amplification (27%), were not associated with response, TTP or OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EGFRvIII mutation, present in about 40% of SCCHN, appears to be an unexpected prognostic biomarker associated with better disease control in R/M SCCHN regardless of treatment with erlotinib. Larger prospective studies are required to validate its significance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-3284-3-11\",\"citationCount\":\"83\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The association between EGFR variant III, HPV, p16, c-MET, EGFR gene copy number and response to EGFR inhibitors in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Background: We examine the potential prognostic and predictive roles of EGFR variant III mutation, EGFR gene copy number (GCN), human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, c-MET and p16INK4A protein expression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).
Methods: We analyzed the archival tumor specimens of 53 patients who were treated in 4 phase II trials for R/M SCCHN. Two trials involved the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib, and 2 trials involved non-EGFR targeted agents. EGFRvIII mutation was determined by quantitative RT-PCR, HPV DNA by Linear Array Genotyping, p16 and c-MET protein expression by immunohistochemistry, and EGFR GCN by FISH.
Results: EGFRvIII mutation, detected in 22 patients (42%), was associated with better disease control, but no difference was seen between erlotinib-treated versus non-erlotinib treated patients. EGFRvIII was not associated with TTP or OS. The presence of HPV DNA (38%), p16 immunostaining (32%), c-MET high expression (58%) and EGFR amplification (27%), were not associated with response, TTP or OS.
Conclusion: EGFRvIII mutation, present in about 40% of SCCHN, appears to be an unexpected prognostic biomarker associated with better disease control in R/M SCCHN regardless of treatment with erlotinib. Larger prospective studies are required to validate its significance.