使用凝胶帽帮助内镜插入鼻胃管:一个比较审计。

Tahwinder Upile, Paul Stimpson, Miles Christie, Jaspal Mahil, Hitesh Tailor, Waseem K Jerjes
{"title":"使用凝胶帽帮助内镜插入鼻胃管:一个比较审计。","authors":"Tahwinder Upile,&nbsp;Paul Stimpson,&nbsp;Miles Christie,&nbsp;Jaspal Mahil,&nbsp;Hitesh Tailor,&nbsp;Waseem K Jerjes","doi":"10.1186/1758-3284-3-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nutrition is crucial to successful outcomes in peri-operative head and neck cancer patients. Nasogastric feeding tubes are an accepted and safe method of providing enteral nutrition in the short-term. Many methods have been advocated for successfully inserting and securing nasogastric tubes and each practitioner will have his or her preferred technique.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To confirm the effectiveness of using gel caps combined with the flexible nasendoscope for the insertion of nasogastric feeding tubes in head and neck cancer patients following failure of traditional methods.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Thirty-five consecutive patients requiring nasogastric feeding tubes were included in this comparative audit. All had failed traditional insertion methods after 2 attempts and were therefore eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomised to undergo attempted insertion with the flexible nasendoscope with or without the use of a gel cap (both methods have been previously described). AUDIT OUTCOME: Primary outcome measures showed no significant difference between the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found the methodology to be of no greater benefit to our patients when compared to our alternative current practice for failed blind nasogastric tube insertion. We retain this methodology in our armamentarium for difficult circumstances but have continued with our standard practice for most patients needing nasogastric tube placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49195,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society","volume":"3 ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-3284-3-24","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of gel caps to aid endoscopic insertion of nasogastric feeding tubes: a comparative audit.\",\"authors\":\"Tahwinder Upile,&nbsp;Paul Stimpson,&nbsp;Miles Christie,&nbsp;Jaspal Mahil,&nbsp;Hitesh Tailor,&nbsp;Waseem K Jerjes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1758-3284-3-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nutrition is crucial to successful outcomes in peri-operative head and neck cancer patients. Nasogastric feeding tubes are an accepted and safe method of providing enteral nutrition in the short-term. Many methods have been advocated for successfully inserting and securing nasogastric tubes and each practitioner will have his or her preferred technique.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To confirm the effectiveness of using gel caps combined with the flexible nasendoscope for the insertion of nasogastric feeding tubes in head and neck cancer patients following failure of traditional methods.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Thirty-five consecutive patients requiring nasogastric feeding tubes were included in this comparative audit. All had failed traditional insertion methods after 2 attempts and were therefore eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomised to undergo attempted insertion with the flexible nasendoscope with or without the use of a gel cap (both methods have been previously described). AUDIT OUTCOME: Primary outcome measures showed no significant difference between the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found the methodology to be of no greater benefit to our patients when compared to our alternative current practice for failed blind nasogastric tube insertion. We retain this methodology in our armamentarium for difficult circumstances but have continued with our standard practice for most patients needing nasogastric tube placement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-3284-3-24\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

导言:营养对头颈癌围手术期患者的成功预后至关重要。鼻胃管是短期内提供肠内营养的一种公认和安全的方法。许多方法已被提倡成功插入和固定鼻胃管,每个医生将有他或她的首选技术。目的:探讨凝胶帽联合柔性鼻内窥镜在传统方法失败的头颈部肿瘤患者鼻胃管插入中的应用效果。参与者:连续35例需要鼻胃管喂养的患者纳入了这次比较审计。所有患者在两次传统插入方法尝试后均失败,因此符合纳入条件。患者被随机分为两组,分别尝试使用或不使用凝胶帽的柔性鼻内窥镜插入(两种方法之前都有描述)。审计结果:主要结果测量显示两种技术之间无显著差异。讨论:我们发现,与我们目前的替代方法相比,该方法对我们的患者并没有更大的益处,因为我们的盲鼻胃管插入失败。在困难的情况下,我们保留了这种方法,但对于大多数需要放置鼻胃管的患者,我们继续采用我们的标准做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of gel caps to aid endoscopic insertion of nasogastric feeding tubes: a comparative audit.

Introduction: Nutrition is crucial to successful outcomes in peri-operative head and neck cancer patients. Nasogastric feeding tubes are an accepted and safe method of providing enteral nutrition in the short-term. Many methods have been advocated for successfully inserting and securing nasogastric tubes and each practitioner will have his or her preferred technique.

Objectives: To confirm the effectiveness of using gel caps combined with the flexible nasendoscope for the insertion of nasogastric feeding tubes in head and neck cancer patients following failure of traditional methods.

Participants: Thirty-five consecutive patients requiring nasogastric feeding tubes were included in this comparative audit. All had failed traditional insertion methods after 2 attempts and were therefore eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomised to undergo attempted insertion with the flexible nasendoscope with or without the use of a gel cap (both methods have been previously described). AUDIT OUTCOME: Primary outcome measures showed no significant difference between the two techniques.

Discussion: We found the methodology to be of no greater benefit to our patients when compared to our alternative current practice for failed blind nasogastric tube insertion. We retain this methodology in our armamentarium for difficult circumstances but have continued with our standard practice for most patients needing nasogastric tube placement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Pattern of Cervical Nodal Metastasis of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Squamous at the Time of Diagnosis in Patients Attending Tikur Anbessa Hospital from September 2015 to September 2020 An Inclusion Epidermoid Cyst, a Rare Complication of Versatile Naso-Labial Flap Immune cell infiltration patterns and survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Intercondylar distance before and after mandible resection Effect of human beta-defensin-3 on head and neck cancer cell migration using micro-fabricated cell islands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1