{"title":"立体定向放射治疗前列腺癌:当前II期试验的结果。","authors":"Christopher King","doi":"10.1159/000322507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The hypofractionation of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer has become a broad topic, and there are many aspects to consider before accepting this treatment into our clinics. Among the considerations are the data from the Stanford phase II trial, a seminal investigation into this area, which will be presented and reviewed here. A single-arm, prospective phase II trial was initiated at Stanford in December of 2003. This trial uses SBRT as monotherapy for 'low-risk' prostate cancer patients, and 69 patients have been entered to date. We have analyzed the patient data for the first 5 years of this study. For study entry, patients were required to have clinical stage T1c or T2a disease, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 10 and a Gleason score of 3 + 3 (or 3 + 4 if the higher grade portion was of small volume, usually <25% of the cores involved). No prior treatment was permitted, including the use of transurethral resections or androgen deprivation therapies. A low urinary IPSS score of < 20 was required for study entry as well. The prescription dose was 7.25 Gy for 5 fractions for a total dose of 36.25 Gy. This was normalized to cover ≥ 95% of the planning target volume with 100% of the prescription dose. Patients were treated using CyberKnife technology. To date, excellent PSA responses have been observed in patients with lower-risk disease selected for treatment and receiving 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. To date, sexual quality of life outcomes have also been approximately comparable to other radiotherapy approaches. Rates of late GI and GU toxicity have been relatively low and generally comparable to dose-escalated approaches using conventional fractionation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55140,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology","volume":"43 ","pages":"428-437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000322507","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: current results of a phase II trial.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher King\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000322507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The hypofractionation of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer has become a broad topic, and there are many aspects to consider before accepting this treatment into our clinics. Among the considerations are the data from the Stanford phase II trial, a seminal investigation into this area, which will be presented and reviewed here. A single-arm, prospective phase II trial was initiated at Stanford in December of 2003. This trial uses SBRT as monotherapy for 'low-risk' prostate cancer patients, and 69 patients have been entered to date. We have analyzed the patient data for the first 5 years of this study. For study entry, patients were required to have clinical stage T1c or T2a disease, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 10 and a Gleason score of 3 + 3 (or 3 + 4 if the higher grade portion was of small volume, usually <25% of the cores involved). No prior treatment was permitted, including the use of transurethral resections or androgen deprivation therapies. A low urinary IPSS score of < 20 was required for study entry as well. The prescription dose was 7.25 Gy for 5 fractions for a total dose of 36.25 Gy. This was normalized to cover ≥ 95% of the planning target volume with 100% of the prescription dose. Patients were treated using CyberKnife technology. To date, excellent PSA responses have been observed in patients with lower-risk disease selected for treatment and receiving 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. To date, sexual quality of life outcomes have also been approximately comparable to other radiotherapy approaches. Rates of late GI and GU toxicity have been relatively low and generally comparable to dose-escalated approaches using conventional fractionation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"428-437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000322507\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000322507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000322507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: current results of a phase II trial.
The hypofractionation of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer has become a broad topic, and there are many aspects to consider before accepting this treatment into our clinics. Among the considerations are the data from the Stanford phase II trial, a seminal investigation into this area, which will be presented and reviewed here. A single-arm, prospective phase II trial was initiated at Stanford in December of 2003. This trial uses SBRT as monotherapy for 'low-risk' prostate cancer patients, and 69 patients have been entered to date. We have analyzed the patient data for the first 5 years of this study. For study entry, patients were required to have clinical stage T1c or T2a disease, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 10 and a Gleason score of 3 + 3 (or 3 + 4 if the higher grade portion was of small volume, usually <25% of the cores involved). No prior treatment was permitted, including the use of transurethral resections or androgen deprivation therapies. A low urinary IPSS score of < 20 was required for study entry as well. The prescription dose was 7.25 Gy for 5 fractions for a total dose of 36.25 Gy. This was normalized to cover ≥ 95% of the planning target volume with 100% of the prescription dose. Patients were treated using CyberKnife technology. To date, excellent PSA responses have been observed in patients with lower-risk disease selected for treatment and receiving 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. To date, sexual quality of life outcomes have also been approximately comparable to other radiotherapy approaches. Rates of late GI and GU toxicity have been relatively low and generally comparable to dose-escalated approaches using conventional fractionation.