电话药物治疗管理对药物和健康相关问题、药物依从性和医疗保险D部分药物费用的影响:6个月随访

Leticia R. Moczygemba PharmD, PhD , Jamie C. Barner PhD , Kenneth A. Lawson PhD , Carolyn M. Brown PhD , Evelyn R. Gabrillo PharmD , Paul Godley PharmD , Michael Johnsrud PhD
{"title":"电话药物治疗管理对药物和健康相关问题、药物依从性和医疗保险D部分药物费用的影响:6个月随访","authors":"Leticia R. Moczygemba PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jamie C. Barner PhD ,&nbsp;Kenneth A. Lawson PhD ,&nbsp;Carolyn M. Brown PhD ,&nbsp;Evelyn R. Gabrillo PharmD ,&nbsp;Paul Godley PharmD ,&nbsp;Michael Johnsrud PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 mandated the provision of medication therapy management (MTM) to eligible Part D beneficiaries to improve medication-related outcomes. As MTM programs evolve, evaluation is necessary to help inform MTM best practices.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to determine the impact of pharmacist-provided telephone MTM on: (1) medication and health-related problems (MHRPs); (2) medication adherence; and (3) Part D drug costs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This quasi-experimental study included Part D beneficiaries from a Texas health plan. Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use served as the study framework. MTM utilization was the health behavior. Age, gender, and race were predisposing factors, and number of medications, chronic diseases, and medication regimen complexity were need factors. Outcomes were pre-to-post changes in: (1) MHRPs; (2) medication adherence, using the medication possession ratio (MPR); and (3) total drug costs. Multiple regression was used to analyze group differences while controlling for predisposing and need factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At baseline, the intervention (n = 60) and control (n = 60) groups were not statistically different regarding predisposing and need factors, with the exception of gender. The intervention group had significantly (<em>P</em> = 0.009) more men compared with the control group (51.7% vs 28.3%). There were 4.8 (2.7) and 9.2 (2.9) MHRPs identified at baseline and 2.5 (2.0) and 7.9 (3.0) MHRPs remained at the 6-month follow up in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The intervention group (vs control) had significantly more MHRPs resolved (<em>P</em> = 0.0003). There were no significant predictors of change in MPR or total drug costs from baseline to follow up, although total drug costs decreased by $158 in the intervention group compared with a $118 increase in the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A telephone MTM program resolved significantly more MHRPs compared with a control group, but there were no significant changes in adherence and total drug costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50811,"journal":{"name":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","volume":"9 5","pages":"Pages 328-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.08.001","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Telephone Medication Therapy Management on Medication and Health-Related Problems, Medication Adherence, and Medicare Part D Drug Costs: A 6-Month Follow Up\",\"authors\":\"Leticia R. Moczygemba PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jamie C. Barner PhD ,&nbsp;Kenneth A. Lawson PhD ,&nbsp;Carolyn M. Brown PhD ,&nbsp;Evelyn R. Gabrillo PharmD ,&nbsp;Paul Godley PharmD ,&nbsp;Michael Johnsrud PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 mandated the provision of medication therapy management (MTM) to eligible Part D beneficiaries to improve medication-related outcomes. As MTM programs evolve, evaluation is necessary to help inform MTM best practices.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to determine the impact of pharmacist-provided telephone MTM on: (1) medication and health-related problems (MHRPs); (2) medication adherence; and (3) Part D drug costs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This quasi-experimental study included Part D beneficiaries from a Texas health plan. Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use served as the study framework. MTM utilization was the health behavior. Age, gender, and race were predisposing factors, and number of medications, chronic diseases, and medication regimen complexity were need factors. Outcomes were pre-to-post changes in: (1) MHRPs; (2) medication adherence, using the medication possession ratio (MPR); and (3) total drug costs. Multiple regression was used to analyze group differences while controlling for predisposing and need factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At baseline, the intervention (n = 60) and control (n = 60) groups were not statistically different regarding predisposing and need factors, with the exception of gender. The intervention group had significantly (<em>P</em> = 0.009) more men compared with the control group (51.7% vs 28.3%). There were 4.8 (2.7) and 9.2 (2.9) MHRPs identified at baseline and 2.5 (2.0) and 7.9 (3.0) MHRPs remained at the 6-month follow up in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The intervention group (vs control) had significantly more MHRPs resolved (<em>P</em> = 0.0003). There were no significant predictors of change in MPR or total drug costs from baseline to follow up, although total drug costs decreased by $158 in the intervention group compared with a $118 increase in the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A telephone MTM program resolved significantly more MHRPs compared with a control group, but there were no significant changes in adherence and total drug costs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 328-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.08.001\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1543594611001401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1543594611001401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

背景:2003年的《医疗保险现代化法案》授权向符合条件的D部分受益人提供药物治疗管理(MTM),以改善药物相关的结果。随着MTM程序的发展,评估是必要的,以帮助告知MTM最佳实践。目的本研究的目的是确定药师提供的电话MTM对:(1)用药和健康相关问题(MHRPs)的影响;(2)药物依从性;(3) D部分药品费用。方法本准实验研究纳入了来自德克萨斯州健康计划的D部分受益人。Andersen的卫生服务使用行为模型作为研究框架。MTM的使用是健康行为。年龄、性别和种族是易感因素,药物数量、慢性疾病和用药方案复杂性是需要因素。结果为:(1)mhrp的前后变化;(2)药物依从性,用药物占有比(MPR)表示;(3)药品总费用。在控制易感因素和需要因素的情况下,采用多元回归分析组间差异。结果基线时,干预组(n = 60)与对照组(n = 60)除性别差异外,易感因素和需求因素均无统计学差异。干预组男性患病率明显高于对照组(51.7% vs 28.3%) (P = 0.009)。基线时鉴定出4.8(2.7)和9.2(2.9)个mhrp,干预组和对照组在6个月随访时分别鉴定出2.5(2.0)和7.9(3.0)个mhrp。干预组(与对照组相比)的mhrp解决率显著高于对照组(P = 0.0003)。从基线到随访,MPR或总药物费用没有显著的变化预测因子,尽管干预组的总药物费用减少了158美元,而对照组增加了118美元。结论与对照组相比,电话MTM方案解决了更多的mhrp,但依从性和总药物费用无显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Telephone Medication Therapy Management on Medication and Health-Related Problems, Medication Adherence, and Medicare Part D Drug Costs: A 6-Month Follow Up

Background

The Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 mandated the provision of medication therapy management (MTM) to eligible Part D beneficiaries to improve medication-related outcomes. As MTM programs evolve, evaluation is necessary to help inform MTM best practices.

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of pharmacist-provided telephone MTM on: (1) medication and health-related problems (MHRPs); (2) medication adherence; and (3) Part D drug costs.

Methods

This quasi-experimental study included Part D beneficiaries from a Texas health plan. Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use served as the study framework. MTM utilization was the health behavior. Age, gender, and race were predisposing factors, and number of medications, chronic diseases, and medication regimen complexity were need factors. Outcomes were pre-to-post changes in: (1) MHRPs; (2) medication adherence, using the medication possession ratio (MPR); and (3) total drug costs. Multiple regression was used to analyze group differences while controlling for predisposing and need factors.

Results

At baseline, the intervention (n = 60) and control (n = 60) groups were not statistically different regarding predisposing and need factors, with the exception of gender. The intervention group had significantly (P = 0.009) more men compared with the control group (51.7% vs 28.3%). There were 4.8 (2.7) and 9.2 (2.9) MHRPs identified at baseline and 2.5 (2.0) and 7.9 (3.0) MHRPs remained at the 6-month follow up in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The intervention group (vs control) had significantly more MHRPs resolved (P = 0.0003). There were no significant predictors of change in MPR or total drug costs from baseline to follow up, although total drug costs decreased by $158 in the intervention group compared with a $118 increase in the control group.

Conclusions

A telephone MTM program resolved significantly more MHRPs compared with a control group, but there were no significant changes in adherence and total drug costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Author Index Subject Index Editorial Board Adverse Effects of Analgesics Commonly Used by Older Adults With Osteoarthritis: Focus on Non-Opioid and Opioid Analgesics Effect of Combination Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol or Inhaled Corticosteroids on Asthma-Related Outcomes in a Medicare-Eligible Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1