市民透过互联网订购处方眼镜的安全及合规性

Karl Citek O.D., Ph.D. , Daniel L. Torgersen MBA, MS , Jeffrey D. Endres ABOC , Robert R. Rosenberg O.D.
{"title":"市民透过互联网订购处方眼镜的安全及合规性","authors":"Karl Citek O.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Daniel L. Torgersen MBA, MS ,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Endres ABOC ,&nbsp;Robert R. Rosenberg O.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.optm.2011.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study investigated prescription spectacles ordered from online vendors and delivered directly to the public for compliance with the optical tolerance and impact resistance requirements for eyewear dispensed in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ten individuals ordered 2 pairs of spectacles from each of 10 of the most visited Internet vendors, totaling 200 eyewear orders. Spectacles ordered consisted of ranges of lens and frame materials, lens styles, and refractive corrections reflecting current distributions in the United States. Evaluations included measurement of sphere power, cylinder power and axis, add power (if indicated), horizontal prism imbalance, and impact testing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We received and evaluated 154 pairs of spectacles, comprising 308 lenses. Several spectacles were provided incorrectly, such as single vision instead of multifocal and lens treatments added or omitted. In 28.6% of spectacles, at least 1 lens failed tolerance standards for at least 1 optical parameter, and in 22.7% of spectacles, at least 1 lens failed impact testing. Overall, 44.8% of spectacles failed at least 1 parameter of optical or impact testing.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nearly half of prescription spectacles delivered directly by online vendors did not meet either the optical requirements of the patient's visual needs or the physical requirements for the patient's safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51265,"journal":{"name":"Optometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.optm.2011.07.012","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and compliance of prescription spectacles ordered by the public via the Internet\",\"authors\":\"Karl Citek O.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Daniel L. Torgersen MBA, MS ,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Endres ABOC ,&nbsp;Robert R. Rosenberg O.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optm.2011.07.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study investigated prescription spectacles ordered from online vendors and delivered directly to the public for compliance with the optical tolerance and impact resistance requirements for eyewear dispensed in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ten individuals ordered 2 pairs of spectacles from each of 10 of the most visited Internet vendors, totaling 200 eyewear orders. Spectacles ordered consisted of ranges of lens and frame materials, lens styles, and refractive corrections reflecting current distributions in the United States. Evaluations included measurement of sphere power, cylinder power and axis, add power (if indicated), horizontal prism imbalance, and impact testing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We received and evaluated 154 pairs of spectacles, comprising 308 lenses. Several spectacles were provided incorrectly, such as single vision instead of multifocal and lens treatments added or omitted. In 28.6% of spectacles, at least 1 lens failed tolerance standards for at least 1 optical parameter, and in 22.7% of spectacles, at least 1 lens failed impact testing. Overall, 44.8% of spectacles failed at least 1 parameter of optical or impact testing.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nearly half of prescription spectacles delivered directly by online vendors did not meet either the optical requirements of the patient's visual needs or the physical requirements for the patient's safety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.optm.2011.07.012\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529183911004064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529183911004064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本研究调查了从在线供应商订购并直接交付给公众的处方眼镜,以符合在美国配售的眼镜的光学公差和抗冲击要求。方法10名个人从10个访问量最大的互联网供应商中各订购了2副眼镜,共计200副眼镜订单。订购的眼镜包括镜片和框架材料的范围,镜片样式和折射校正,反映当前在美国的分布。评估包括测量球体功率,圆柱体功率和轴,添加功率(如果有指示),水平棱镜不平衡和冲击测试。结果我们收到并评价了154副眼镜,包括308个镜片。有几副眼镜提供不正确,例如单焦而不是多焦,以及增加或省略了晶状体治疗。在28.6%的眼镜中,至少有一个镜片不符合至少一个光学参数的公差标准,在22.7%的眼镜中,至少有一个镜片不符合冲击测试。总体而言,44.8%的眼镜在光学或冲击测试中至少有一个参数不合格。结论网络销售商直接提供的处方眼镜中,有近一半既不符合患者视觉需求的光学要求,也不符合患者安全的物理要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and compliance of prescription spectacles ordered by the public via the Internet

Background

This study investigated prescription spectacles ordered from online vendors and delivered directly to the public for compliance with the optical tolerance and impact resistance requirements for eyewear dispensed in the United States.

Methods

Ten individuals ordered 2 pairs of spectacles from each of 10 of the most visited Internet vendors, totaling 200 eyewear orders. Spectacles ordered consisted of ranges of lens and frame materials, lens styles, and refractive corrections reflecting current distributions in the United States. Evaluations included measurement of sphere power, cylinder power and axis, add power (if indicated), horizontal prism imbalance, and impact testing.

Results

We received and evaluated 154 pairs of spectacles, comprising 308 lenses. Several spectacles were provided incorrectly, such as single vision instead of multifocal and lens treatments added or omitted. In 28.6% of spectacles, at least 1 lens failed tolerance standards for at least 1 optical parameter, and in 22.7% of spectacles, at least 1 lens failed impact testing. Overall, 44.8% of spectacles failed at least 1 parameter of optical or impact testing.

Conclusion

Nearly half of prescription spectacles delivered directly by online vendors did not meet either the optical requirements of the patient's visual needs or the physical requirements for the patient's safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Optometry
Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
TRICARE. Under pressure. Central corneal thickness measurements obtained with anterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography compared to ultrasound pachymetry in healthy subjects. Normalization of retinal nerve fiber layer with stratus optical coherence tomography after bilateral diabetic papillopathy. Current status on the development and treatment of myopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1