外卖食品消费对果蔬摄入社会经济差异的贡献:一个中介分析

Kyoko Miura, Katrina Giskes PhD, Gavin Turrell PhD
{"title":"外卖食品消费对果蔬摄入社会经济差异的贡献:一个中介分析","authors":"Kyoko Miura,&nbsp;Katrina Giskes PhD,&nbsp;Gavin Turrell PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lower fruit and vegetable (F/V) intake among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups has been well documented, and may be a consequence of a higher consumption of take-out foods. This study examined whether, and to what extent, take-out food consumption mediated (explained) the association between socioeconomic position and F/V intake. A cross-sectional postal survey was conducted among 1,500 randomly selected adults aged 25 to 64 years in Brisbane, Australia, during 2009 (response rate 63.7%, N=903). A food frequency questionnaire assessed usual daily servings of F/V (0 to 6), overall take-out consumption (times per week), and the consumption of 22 specific take-out items (never to once per day or more). These specific take-out items were grouped into “less healthy” and “healthy” choices and indexes were created for each type of choice (0 to 100). Socioeconomic position was ascertained by education. The analyses were performed using linear regression, and a bootstrap resampling approach estimated the statistical significance of the mediated effects. Mean daily servings of F/V were 1.89±1.05 and 2.47±1.12, respectively. The least educated group members were more likely to consume fewer servings of fruit (β= −.39, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001) and vegetables (β= −.43, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001) compared with members of the highest educated group. The consumption of “less healthy” take-out food partly explained (mediated) education differences in F/V intake; however, no mediating effects were observed for overall and “healthy” take-out consumption. Regular consumption of “less healthy” take-out items may contribute to socioeconomic differences in F/V intake, possibly by displacing these foods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.009","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contribution of Take-Out Food Consumption to Socioeconomic Differences in Fruit and Vegetable Intake: A Mediation Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kyoko Miura,&nbsp;Katrina Giskes PhD,&nbsp;Gavin Turrell PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Lower fruit and vegetable (F/V) intake among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups has been well documented, and may be a consequence of a higher consumption of take-out foods. This study examined whether, and to what extent, take-out food consumption mediated (explained) the association between socioeconomic position and F/V intake. A cross-sectional postal survey was conducted among 1,500 randomly selected adults aged 25 to 64 years in Brisbane, Australia, during 2009 (response rate 63.7%, N=903). A food frequency questionnaire assessed usual daily servings of F/V (0 to 6), overall take-out consumption (times per week), and the consumption of 22 specific take-out items (never to once per day or more). These specific take-out items were grouped into “less healthy” and “healthy” choices and indexes were created for each type of choice (0 to 100). Socioeconomic position was ascertained by education. The analyses were performed using linear regression, and a bootstrap resampling approach estimated the statistical significance of the mediated effects. Mean daily servings of F/V were 1.89±1.05 and 2.47±1.12, respectively. The least educated group members were more likely to consume fewer servings of fruit (β= −.39, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001) and vegetables (β= −.43, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001) compared with members of the highest educated group. The consumption of “less healthy” take-out food partly explained (mediated) education differences in F/V intake; however, no mediating effects were observed for overall and “healthy” take-out consumption. Regular consumption of “less healthy” take-out items may contribute to socioeconomic differences in F/V intake, possibly by displacing these foods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The American Dietetic Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.009\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The American Dietetic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822311012168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822311012168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

社会经济弱势群体的水果和蔬菜(F/V)摄入量较低已得到充分证明,这可能是外卖食品消费量较高的结果。本研究考察了外卖食品消费是否以及在多大程度上介导(解释)了社会经济地位与脂肪/脂肪摄入量之间的关联。本研究于2009年在澳大利亚布里斯班随机抽取1500名年龄在25岁至64岁之间的成年人进行横断面邮政调查(回复率63.7%,N=903)。一份食物频率问卷评估了通常每日的F/V(0至6),总外卖消费(每周次数),以及22种特定外卖产品的消费(从不到每天一次或更多次)。这些特定的外卖项目被分为“不太健康”和“健康”两类,并为每种选择创建了指数(0到100)。社会经济地位是由教育确定的。分析使用线性回归进行,并采用自举重抽样方法估计中介效应的统计显著性。平均每日摄入F/V分别为1.89±1.05和2.47±1.12。受教育程度最低的小组成员更有可能摄入更少的水果(β=−)。39, P<0.001)和蔬菜(β= -。43, P<0.001),与受教育程度最高的群体相比。“不太健康”的外卖食品的消费部分解释了(中介)F/V摄入量的教育差异;然而,没有观察到整体和“健康”外卖消费的中介效应。经常食用“不太健康”的外卖食品可能会导致F/V摄入量的社会经济差异,可能是通过取代这些食物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contribution of Take-Out Food Consumption to Socioeconomic Differences in Fruit and Vegetable Intake: A Mediation Analysis

Lower fruit and vegetable (F/V) intake among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups has been well documented, and may be a consequence of a higher consumption of take-out foods. This study examined whether, and to what extent, take-out food consumption mediated (explained) the association between socioeconomic position and F/V intake. A cross-sectional postal survey was conducted among 1,500 randomly selected adults aged 25 to 64 years in Brisbane, Australia, during 2009 (response rate 63.7%, N=903). A food frequency questionnaire assessed usual daily servings of F/V (0 to 6), overall take-out consumption (times per week), and the consumption of 22 specific take-out items (never to once per day or more). These specific take-out items were grouped into “less healthy” and “healthy” choices and indexes were created for each type of choice (0 to 100). Socioeconomic position was ascertained by education. The analyses were performed using linear regression, and a bootstrap resampling approach estimated the statistical significance of the mediated effects. Mean daily servings of F/V were 1.89±1.05 and 2.47±1.12, respectively. The least educated group members were more likely to consume fewer servings of fruit (β= −.39, P<0.001) and vegetables (β= −.43, P<0.001) compared with members of the highest educated group. The consumption of “less healthy” take-out food partly explained (mediated) education differences in F/V intake; however, no mediating effects were observed for overall and “healthy” take-out consumption. Regular consumption of “less healthy” take-out items may contribute to socioeconomic differences in F/V intake, possibly by displacing these foods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Infant Feeding Practices What about corn oil? Program Outline Overweight Children Good reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1