沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松与丙酸氟替卡松在哮喘患者中的疗效和耐受性:一项随机双盲研究

Chang Gung medical journal Pub Date : 2011-07-01
Yu-Sung Lee, Horng-Chyuan Lin, Chien-Da Huang, Kang-Yun Lee, Chien-Ying Liu, Chih-Teng Yu, Chun-Hua Wang, Han-Pin Kuo
{"title":"沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松与丙酸氟替卡松在哮喘患者中的疗效和耐受性:一项随机双盲研究","authors":"Yu-Sung Lee,&nbsp;Horng-Chyuan Lin,&nbsp;Chien-Da Huang,&nbsp;Kang-Yun Lee,&nbsp;Chien-Ying Liu,&nbsp;Chih-Teng Yu,&nbsp;Chun-Hua Wang,&nbsp;Han-Pin Kuo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (SAL/FP) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of asthma. We compared the efficacy and tolerability of SAL/FP (50/250 μg) with fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 μg administrated twice daily for 2 weeks in treating patients with mild to moderate asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized, double-blind study in adult patients with symptomatic asthma that was not controlled by 1000 μg/d inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone. 48 asthmatics were randomized to receive 2 inhalations of SAL/FP 50/250 μg bis in die (BID) or 2 inhalations of FP 250 μg BID, both delivered via Accuhaler device, for 2 weeks. The primary objective was the mean change from baseline in the mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the two week period. Other parameters included lung function, daily asthma symptom scores, evening PEF, percentage of days free of rescue medication use and daily rescue medication use. Tolerability was assessed by adverse events spontaneously elicited at clinic visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>46 patients provided evaluable efficacy for analysis. The morning PEF improved significantly throughout the two weeks of treatment compared with baseline in the SAL/FP group. Mean morning PEF was 23.0 L/min higher in SAL/FP group than in FP group (p = 0.013). The change of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) from baseline was greater in SAL/FP group compared to FP group (p = 0.048). There were similar effects on day-time and night-time symptom scores, percentage symptom free days and nights and usage of salbutamol. 70.8% of the patients receiving SAL/FP were satisfied with the treatment, while only 26.1% of patients receiving FP alone were (p = 0.020). No death or acute exacerbation occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAL/FP 50/250 μg was safe and effective, and had a high level of patient satisfaction resulting in significantly greater increases in morning PEF and FEV1 compared to the use of FP 250 μg alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":10018,"journal":{"name":"Chang Gung medical journal","volume":"34 4","pages":"382-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and tolerability of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus fluticasone propionate in asthma patients: a randomized, double-blind study.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Sung Lee,&nbsp;Horng-Chyuan Lin,&nbsp;Chien-Da Huang,&nbsp;Kang-Yun Lee,&nbsp;Chien-Ying Liu,&nbsp;Chih-Teng Yu,&nbsp;Chun-Hua Wang,&nbsp;Han-Pin Kuo\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (SAL/FP) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of asthma. We compared the efficacy and tolerability of SAL/FP (50/250 μg) with fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 μg administrated twice daily for 2 weeks in treating patients with mild to moderate asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized, double-blind study in adult patients with symptomatic asthma that was not controlled by 1000 μg/d inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone. 48 asthmatics were randomized to receive 2 inhalations of SAL/FP 50/250 μg bis in die (BID) or 2 inhalations of FP 250 μg BID, both delivered via Accuhaler device, for 2 weeks. The primary objective was the mean change from baseline in the mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the two week period. Other parameters included lung function, daily asthma symptom scores, evening PEF, percentage of days free of rescue medication use and daily rescue medication use. Tolerability was assessed by adverse events spontaneously elicited at clinic visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>46 patients provided evaluable efficacy for analysis. The morning PEF improved significantly throughout the two weeks of treatment compared with baseline in the SAL/FP group. Mean morning PEF was 23.0 L/min higher in SAL/FP group than in FP group (p = 0.013). The change of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) from baseline was greater in SAL/FP group compared to FP group (p = 0.048). There were similar effects on day-time and night-time symptom scores, percentage symptom free days and nights and usage of salbutamol. 70.8% of the patients receiving SAL/FP were satisfied with the treatment, while only 26.1% of patients receiving FP alone were (p = 0.020). No death or acute exacerbation occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAL/FP 50/250 μg was safe and effective, and had a high level of patient satisfaction resulting in significantly greater increases in morning PEF and FEV1 compared to the use of FP 250 μg alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chang Gung medical journal\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"382-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chang Gung medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chang Gung medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:沙美特罗和丙酸氟替卡松(SAL/FP)联合治疗哮喘已被证明是有效的。我们比较了SAL/FP (50/250 μg)与丙酸氟替卡松(FP) 250 μg每日2次,连用2周治疗轻中度哮喘患者的疗效和耐受性。方法:这是一项随机、双盲研究,在成年有症状哮喘患者中,不单独使用1000 μg/d吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)进行控制。48例哮喘患者随机分为两组,分别通过Accuhaler装置吸入2次SAL/FP 50/250 μg / BID或2次FP 250 μg / BID,持续2周。主要目标是两周内平均早晨呼气峰流量(PEF)相对基线的平均变化。其他参数包括肺功能、每日哮喘症状评分、夜间PEF、无抢救用药天数百分比和每日抢救用药。耐受性是通过在诊所就诊时自发引起的不良事件来评估的。结果:46例患者具有可评价的疗效。在整个两周的治疗过程中,与基线相比,SAL/FP组的早晨PEF显著改善。SAL/FP组晨间平均PEF比FP组高23.0 L/min (p = 0.013)。与FP组相比,SAL/FP组1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)较基线变化更大(p = 0.048)。在白天和夜间症状评分、无症状天数和夜间百分比以及沙丁胺醇的使用方面也有类似的影响。70.8%的患者对SAL/FP治疗满意,而仅26.1%的患者对FP治疗满意(p = 0.020)。无死亡或急性加重发生。结论:SAL/FP 50/250 μg安全有效,患者满意度高,晨间PEF和FEV1明显高于单独使用FP 250 μg。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and tolerability of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus fluticasone propionate in asthma patients: a randomized, double-blind study.

Background: A combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (SAL/FP) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of asthma. We compared the efficacy and tolerability of SAL/FP (50/250 μg) with fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 μg administrated twice daily for 2 weeks in treating patients with mild to moderate asthma.

Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind study in adult patients with symptomatic asthma that was not controlled by 1000 μg/d inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone. 48 asthmatics were randomized to receive 2 inhalations of SAL/FP 50/250 μg bis in die (BID) or 2 inhalations of FP 250 μg BID, both delivered via Accuhaler device, for 2 weeks. The primary objective was the mean change from baseline in the mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the two week period. Other parameters included lung function, daily asthma symptom scores, evening PEF, percentage of days free of rescue medication use and daily rescue medication use. Tolerability was assessed by adverse events spontaneously elicited at clinic visits.

Results: 46 patients provided evaluable efficacy for analysis. The morning PEF improved significantly throughout the two weeks of treatment compared with baseline in the SAL/FP group. Mean morning PEF was 23.0 L/min higher in SAL/FP group than in FP group (p = 0.013). The change of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) from baseline was greater in SAL/FP group compared to FP group (p = 0.048). There were similar effects on day-time and night-time symptom scores, percentage symptom free days and nights and usage of salbutamol. 70.8% of the patients receiving SAL/FP were satisfied with the treatment, while only 26.1% of patients receiving FP alone were (p = 0.020). No death or acute exacerbation occurred.

Conclusion: SAL/FP 50/250 μg was safe and effective, and had a high level of patient satisfaction resulting in significantly greater increases in morning PEF and FEV1 compared to the use of FP 250 μg alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Avian influenza. The diagnosis and treatment of neonatal seizures. Leiomyosarcoma of the adrenal vein. Team innovation climate and knowledge sharing among healthcare managers: mediating effects of altruistic intentions. Serum lipid profile could predict the inception and impacts of violent behaviors among acute psychiatric inpatients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1