关节镜下经骨肩袖修复术。

Medicine and sport science Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-10-04 DOI:10.1159/000328900
Umile Giuseppe Longo, Francesco Franceschi, Alessandra Berton, Nicola Maffulli, Vincenzo Denaro
{"title":"关节镜下经骨肩袖修复术。","authors":"Umile Giuseppe Longo,&nbsp;Francesco Franceschi,&nbsp;Alessandra Berton,&nbsp;Nicola Maffulli,&nbsp;Vincenzo Denaro","doi":"10.1159/000328900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The arthroscopic approach for rotator cuff repair is extensively used worldwide. Different repairing procedures have evolved with the aim of restoring anatomy and function of rotator cuff tendon. Several studies have analyzed biomechanical factors to understand their influence on tendon to bone healing and improve repair configurations. From a biomechanical point of view, single-row anchor techniques are not able to restore all of the original footprint of the rotator cuff, and result in circumferential tension around the tendon. Transosseus simple suture repairs may have greater potential for healing at the tendon-bone interface, because they allow a larger insertion site area and better pressure characteristics. Biomechanically, double-row suture anchor repair increases the area of contact and the initial fixation strength, decreases the load for each suture loop, knot and anchor, and decreases the stress at each suture-cuff contact point. To optimize healing, transosseous-equivalent techniques have been developed. The oblique suture bridges allow greater pressurized contact, low profile, and interconnection between fixation points that permits to shear load. Clinical studies showed equivalent clinical results of single- and double-row suture anchor repair. However, to date, there are no randomized controlled trials on transosseous or transosseous-equivalent techniques for rotator cuff repair. Clearly, studies of higher levels of evidence, including large randomized trials, should be conducted. Future trials should use validated functional and clinical outcomes, adequate methodology, and be sufficiently powered.</p>","PeriodicalId":18475,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and sport science","volume":"57 ","pages":"142-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000328900","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair.\",\"authors\":\"Umile Giuseppe Longo,&nbsp;Francesco Franceschi,&nbsp;Alessandra Berton,&nbsp;Nicola Maffulli,&nbsp;Vincenzo Denaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000328900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The arthroscopic approach for rotator cuff repair is extensively used worldwide. Different repairing procedures have evolved with the aim of restoring anatomy and function of rotator cuff tendon. Several studies have analyzed biomechanical factors to understand their influence on tendon to bone healing and improve repair configurations. From a biomechanical point of view, single-row anchor techniques are not able to restore all of the original footprint of the rotator cuff, and result in circumferential tension around the tendon. Transosseus simple suture repairs may have greater potential for healing at the tendon-bone interface, because they allow a larger insertion site area and better pressure characteristics. Biomechanically, double-row suture anchor repair increases the area of contact and the initial fixation strength, decreases the load for each suture loop, knot and anchor, and decreases the stress at each suture-cuff contact point. To optimize healing, transosseous-equivalent techniques have been developed. The oblique suture bridges allow greater pressurized contact, low profile, and interconnection between fixation points that permits to shear load. Clinical studies showed equivalent clinical results of single- and double-row suture anchor repair. However, to date, there are no randomized controlled trials on transosseous or transosseous-equivalent techniques for rotator cuff repair. Clearly, studies of higher levels of evidence, including large randomized trials, should be conducted. Future trials should use validated functional and clinical outcomes, adequate methodology, and be sufficiently powered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and sport science\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"142-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000328900\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000328900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/10/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000328900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

关节镜入路在世界范围内广泛应用于肩袖修复。为了恢复肩袖肌腱的解剖结构和功能,不同的修复方法已经发展起来。一些研究分析了生物力学因素,以了解它们对肌腱骨愈合和改善修复结构的影响。从生物力学的角度来看,单排锚钉技术不能恢复肌腱套的所有原始足迹,并导致肌腱周围的周向张力。经骨简单缝线修复可能在肌腱-骨界面有更大的愈合潜力,因为它们允许更大的插入部位面积和更好的压力特性。生物力学上,双排缝合锚修复增加了接触面积和初始固定强度,减少了每个缝合环、结和锚的负荷,减少了每个缝合袖接触点的应力。为了优化愈合,已经开发了跨骨等效技术。斜缝线桥允许更大的加压接触,低轮廓和固定点之间的连接,允许剪切载荷。临床研究显示单排和双排缝合锚钉修复的临床效果相当。然而,到目前为止,尚无关于经骨或经骨等效技术用于肩袖修复的随机对照试验。显然,应该进行证据水平更高的研究,包括大型随机试验。未来的试验应使用经过验证的功能和临床结果,适当的方法,并有足够的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair.

The arthroscopic approach for rotator cuff repair is extensively used worldwide. Different repairing procedures have evolved with the aim of restoring anatomy and function of rotator cuff tendon. Several studies have analyzed biomechanical factors to understand their influence on tendon to bone healing and improve repair configurations. From a biomechanical point of view, single-row anchor techniques are not able to restore all of the original footprint of the rotator cuff, and result in circumferential tension around the tendon. Transosseus simple suture repairs may have greater potential for healing at the tendon-bone interface, because they allow a larger insertion site area and better pressure characteristics. Biomechanically, double-row suture anchor repair increases the area of contact and the initial fixation strength, decreases the load for each suture loop, knot and anchor, and decreases the stress at each suture-cuff contact point. To optimize healing, transosseous-equivalent techniques have been developed. The oblique suture bridges allow greater pressurized contact, low profile, and interconnection between fixation points that permits to shear load. Clinical studies showed equivalent clinical results of single- and double-row suture anchor repair. However, to date, there are no randomized controlled trials on transosseous or transosseous-equivalent techniques for rotator cuff repair. Clearly, studies of higher levels of evidence, including large randomized trials, should be conducted. Future trials should use validated functional and clinical outcomes, adequate methodology, and be sufficiently powered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sport, Society, and Anti-Doping Policy: An Ethical Overview. Structure and Development of the List of Prohibited Substances and Methods. Integration of the Forensic Dimension into Anti-Doping Strategies. How to Develop Intelligence Gathering in Efficient and Practical Anti-Doping Activities. Achievements and Challenges in Anti-Doping Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1