在外部泪囊鼻腔造口术中,更大的截骨导致更大的开口。

Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2012-03-01 Epub Date: 2011-10-17 DOI:10.1001/archfacial.2011.73
Guy J Ben Simon, Chris Brown, Alan A McNab
{"title":"在外部泪囊鼻腔造口术中,更大的截骨导致更大的开口。","authors":"Guy J Ben Simon,&nbsp;Chris Brown,&nbsp;Alan A McNab","doi":"10.1001/archfacial.2011.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether final ostium size is determined by the osteotomy created during dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective nonrandomized study. Intraoperative measurements of bony osteotomy were taken during external DCR. Endonasal endoscopy with functional endoscopic dye testing and internal ostium photography were performed 3 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients (mean age, 63 years) underwent 55 DCRs. Postoperative nasal endoscopy with functional endoscopic dye testing was performed in 27 cases (49%), and measurements of intranasal ostia were feasible in 24 of them (86%). The mean follow-up time was 7 months (range, 3-12 months). Surgical success was achieved in 25 of 27 patients (93%) who underwent postoperative nasal endoscopy. There was no difference in either the intraoperative osteotomy size or the postoperative ostium size between failed and successful cases. The mean (SD) intraoperative osteotomy size was 256.3 (89.0) mm(2), and the mean (SD) postoperative ostium size was 9.6 (6.7) mm(2). The intraoperative osteotomy size correlated positively with the postoperative intranasal ostium size (r = 0.45; P = .03, Pearson bivariate correlation).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Larger osteotomies created during external DCR are correlated with larger postoperative ostia as measured by endonasal endoscopy and image analysis software. There is a trend toward greater success with larger osteotomies; however, failed cases in this series were not associated with smaller-sized intraoperative osteotomies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55470,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archfacial.2011.73","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Larger osteotomies result in larger ostia in external dacryocystorhinostomies.\",\"authors\":\"Guy J Ben Simon,&nbsp;Chris Brown,&nbsp;Alan A McNab\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archfacial.2011.73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether final ostium size is determined by the osteotomy created during dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective nonrandomized study. Intraoperative measurements of bony osteotomy were taken during external DCR. Endonasal endoscopy with functional endoscopic dye testing and internal ostium photography were performed 3 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients (mean age, 63 years) underwent 55 DCRs. Postoperative nasal endoscopy with functional endoscopic dye testing was performed in 27 cases (49%), and measurements of intranasal ostia were feasible in 24 of them (86%). The mean follow-up time was 7 months (range, 3-12 months). Surgical success was achieved in 25 of 27 patients (93%) who underwent postoperative nasal endoscopy. There was no difference in either the intraoperative osteotomy size or the postoperative ostium size between failed and successful cases. The mean (SD) intraoperative osteotomy size was 256.3 (89.0) mm(2), and the mean (SD) postoperative ostium size was 9.6 (6.7) mm(2). The intraoperative osteotomy size correlated positively with the postoperative intranasal ostium size (r = 0.45; P = .03, Pearson bivariate correlation).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Larger osteotomies created during external DCR are correlated with larger postoperative ostia as measured by endonasal endoscopy and image analysis software. There is a trend toward greater success with larger osteotomies; however, failed cases in this series were not associated with smaller-sized intraoperative osteotomies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archfacial.2011.73\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2011.73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/10/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2011.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

目的:探讨泪囊鼻腔造口术(DCR)中截骨是否能决定最终口的大小。设计:前瞻性非随机研究。术中测量骨截骨在外部DCR。术后3个月行鼻内窥镜检查、功能性内窥镜染色检查和内口照相。结果:50例患者(平均年龄63岁)接受了55次dcr。术后27例(49%)患者行鼻内镜及功能性内镜染色试验,其中24例(86%)患者可进行鼻内口测量。平均随访时间7个月(范围3 ~ 12个月)。术后接受鼻内窥镜检查的27例患者中有25例(93%)手术成功。术中截骨大小和术后造口大小在失败和成功病例之间均无差异。术中截骨平均(SD)为256.3 (89.0)mm(2),术后平均(SD)为9.6 (6.7)mm(2)。术中截骨尺寸与术后鼻内口尺寸呈正相关(r = 0.45;P = .03, Pearson双变量相关)。结论:通过鼻内窥镜和图像分析软件测量,在外部DCR中产生的较大截骨与术后较大的口相关。更大的截骨手术有更大成功的趋势;然而,该系列的失败病例与较小尺寸的术中截骨无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Larger osteotomies result in larger ostia in external dacryocystorhinostomies.

Objective: To evaluate whether final ostium size is determined by the osteotomy created during dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).

Design: Prospective nonrandomized study. Intraoperative measurements of bony osteotomy were taken during external DCR. Endonasal endoscopy with functional endoscopic dye testing and internal ostium photography were performed 3 months after surgery.

Results: Fifty patients (mean age, 63 years) underwent 55 DCRs. Postoperative nasal endoscopy with functional endoscopic dye testing was performed in 27 cases (49%), and measurements of intranasal ostia were feasible in 24 of them (86%). The mean follow-up time was 7 months (range, 3-12 months). Surgical success was achieved in 25 of 27 patients (93%) who underwent postoperative nasal endoscopy. There was no difference in either the intraoperative osteotomy size or the postoperative ostium size between failed and successful cases. The mean (SD) intraoperative osteotomy size was 256.3 (89.0) mm(2), and the mean (SD) postoperative ostium size was 9.6 (6.7) mm(2). The intraoperative osteotomy size correlated positively with the postoperative intranasal ostium size (r = 0.45; P = .03, Pearson bivariate correlation).

Conclusions: Larger osteotomies created during external DCR are correlated with larger postoperative ostia as measured by endonasal endoscopy and image analysis software. There is a trend toward greater success with larger osteotomies; however, failed cases in this series were not associated with smaller-sized intraoperative osteotomies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊最新文献
A New Model for Facial Nerve Research Outcomes following temporalis tendon transfer in irradiated patients. Ethical considerations in aesthetic rhinoplasty: a survey, critical analysis, and review. Nasal arterial vasculature: medical and surgical applications. Diced cartilage augmentation: early experience with the Tasman technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1