帕洛诺司琼加1天地塞米松预防中度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐:一项III期试验中确定的危险因素对治疗结果的影响

The journal of supportive oncology Pub Date : 2012-03-01 Epub Date: 2011-09-23 DOI:10.1016/j.suponc.2011.06.007
Luigi Celio, Angela Denaro, Francesco Agustoni, Emilio Bajetta
{"title":"帕洛诺司琼加1天地塞米松预防中度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐:一项III期试验中确定的危险因素对治疗结果的影响","authors":"Luigi Celio,&nbsp;Angela Denaro,&nbsp;Francesco Agustoni,&nbsp;Emilio Bajetta","doi":"10.1016/j.suponc.2011.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The non-inferiority of palonosetron plus 1-day versus 3-day dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) due to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) has been previously demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this prespecified post hoc analysis were to demonstrate the non-inferiority hypothesis in an adjusted model for known risk factors (age, gender, alcohol consumption, and type of MEC [anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC)-based versus other MEC]) for CINV and to explore the impact on antiemetic outcome of these risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Chemonaive patients (n = 324) with solid tumors were randomized to receive palonosetron 0.25 mg IV plus dexamethasone 8 mg IV on day 1 of chemotherapy or the same regimen followed by oral dexamethasone 8 mg on days 2 and 3. The primary end point was complete response (CR, no emesis and no rescue antiemetics) during the 5-day study period. A modified intention-to-treat approach was used for multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-inferiority of the 1-day regimen was confirmed even after adjusting for risk factors (risk difference -4.4%, 95% CI -14.1% to 5.4%; P = .381). Only age less than 50 years (P = .044) independently predicted a poor outcome of antiemetic treatment. However, most of the younger patients were women (1-day regimen 81.8%, 3-day regimen 88.4%) who underwent AC-based chemotherapy (1-day regimen 61.1%, 3-day regimen 71.0%). There were no significant between-treatment differences in the CR rate according to risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis confirmed that the 1-day regimen provides a valid treatment option for prevention of CINV in delayed, non-AC-based MEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":75116,"journal":{"name":"The journal of supportive oncology","volume":"10 2","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.06.007","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palonosetron plus 1-day dexamethasone for the prevention of nausea and vomiting due to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: effect of established risk factors on treatment outcome in a phase III trial.\",\"authors\":\"Luigi Celio,&nbsp;Angela Denaro,&nbsp;Francesco Agustoni,&nbsp;Emilio Bajetta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suponc.2011.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The non-inferiority of palonosetron plus 1-day versus 3-day dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) due to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) has been previously demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this prespecified post hoc analysis were to demonstrate the non-inferiority hypothesis in an adjusted model for known risk factors (age, gender, alcohol consumption, and type of MEC [anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC)-based versus other MEC]) for CINV and to explore the impact on antiemetic outcome of these risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Chemonaive patients (n = 324) with solid tumors were randomized to receive palonosetron 0.25 mg IV plus dexamethasone 8 mg IV on day 1 of chemotherapy or the same regimen followed by oral dexamethasone 8 mg on days 2 and 3. The primary end point was complete response (CR, no emesis and no rescue antiemetics) during the 5-day study period. A modified intention-to-treat approach was used for multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-inferiority of the 1-day regimen was confirmed even after adjusting for risk factors (risk difference -4.4%, 95% CI -14.1% to 5.4%; P = .381). Only age less than 50 years (P = .044) independently predicted a poor outcome of antiemetic treatment. However, most of the younger patients were women (1-day regimen 81.8%, 3-day regimen 88.4%) who underwent AC-based chemotherapy (1-day regimen 61.1%, 3-day regimen 71.0%). There were no significant between-treatment differences in the CR rate according to risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis confirmed that the 1-day regimen provides a valid treatment option for prevention of CINV in delayed, non-AC-based MEC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of supportive oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"65-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.06.007\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of supportive oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.06.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.06.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

背景:帕洛诺司琼联合1天与3天地塞米松在预防中度致吐性化疗(MEC)引起的化疗诱导的恶心和呕吐(CINV)方面的非劣效性已被证实。目的:这项预先设定的事后分析的目的是在一个已知危险因素(年龄、性别、饮酒和MEC类型[基于蒽环类药物加环磷酰胺(AC)与其他MEC])的调整模型中证明非劣效性假设,并探讨这些危险因素对止吐结果的影响。方法:将324例实体瘤化疗患者随机分为两组,分别在化疗第1天给予帕洛诺司琼0.25 mg IV +地塞米松8mg IV,或在化疗第2天和第3天口服地塞米松8mg。主要终点是5天研究期间的完全缓解(CR,无呕吐和无救助性止吐剂)。采用改良的意向治疗方法进行多变量分析。结果:即使在调整了危险因素后,1天方案的非劣效性也得到证实(风险差异-4.4%,95% CI -14.1%至5.4%;P = .381)。只有年龄小于50岁(P = 0.044)独立预测止吐治疗的不良结果。然而,大多数年轻患者是接受ac化疗的女性(1天方案81.8%,3天方案88.4%)(1天方案61.1%,3天方案71.0%)。根据危险因素,两组间的CR率无显著差异。结论:该分析证实,1天方案为延迟性非ac型MEC预防CINV提供了有效的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Palonosetron plus 1-day dexamethasone for the prevention of nausea and vomiting due to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: effect of established risk factors on treatment outcome in a phase III trial.

Background: The non-inferiority of palonosetron plus 1-day versus 3-day dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) due to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) has been previously demonstrated.

Objective: The objectives of this prespecified post hoc analysis were to demonstrate the non-inferiority hypothesis in an adjusted model for known risk factors (age, gender, alcohol consumption, and type of MEC [anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC)-based versus other MEC]) for CINV and to explore the impact on antiemetic outcome of these risk factors.

Methods: Chemonaive patients (n = 324) with solid tumors were randomized to receive palonosetron 0.25 mg IV plus dexamethasone 8 mg IV on day 1 of chemotherapy or the same regimen followed by oral dexamethasone 8 mg on days 2 and 3. The primary end point was complete response (CR, no emesis and no rescue antiemetics) during the 5-day study period. A modified intention-to-treat approach was used for multivariable analysis.

Results: Non-inferiority of the 1-day regimen was confirmed even after adjusting for risk factors (risk difference -4.4%, 95% CI -14.1% to 5.4%; P = .381). Only age less than 50 years (P = .044) independently predicted a poor outcome of antiemetic treatment. However, most of the younger patients were women (1-day regimen 81.8%, 3-day regimen 88.4%) who underwent AC-based chemotherapy (1-day regimen 61.1%, 3-day regimen 71.0%). There were no significant between-treatment differences in the CR rate according to risk factors.

Conclusion: This analysis confirmed that the 1-day regimen provides a valid treatment option for prevention of CINV in delayed, non-AC-based MEC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring the quality of palliative care and supportive oncology: principles and practice. Illness perceptions matter: understanding quality of life and advanced illness behaviors in female patients with late-stage cancer. Monitoring of health-related quality of life and symptoms in prostate cancer survivors: a randomized trial. Characterization of skin reactions and pain reported by patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer at different sites. Whole brain radiotherapy for poor prognosis patients with brain metastases: predictably poor results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1