一种消除商业助听器之间频率响应差异的方法,以便直接比较助听器功能的音质。

Trends in Amplification Pub Date : 2011-03-01 Epub Date: 2011-11-07 DOI:10.1177/1084713811413303
Rolph Houben, Inge Brons, Wouter A Dreschler
{"title":"一种消除商业助听器之间频率响应差异的方法,以便直接比较助听器功能的音质。","authors":"Rolph Houben,&nbsp;Inge Brons,&nbsp;Wouter A Dreschler","doi":"10.1177/1084713811413303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>We want to remove differences in frequency response between different commercial hearing aids so that we can compare the sound quality of signal processing features from different hearing-aid in a future paired-comparison set-up. More specifically, we want to control for the confounding effects of the linear hearing aid response when evaluating nonlinear processing. This article presents a control procedure and evaluates its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We increased the similarity of hearing-aid recordings in three steps and used both an objective quality metric and listening tests to investigate if the recordings from different hearing aids were perceptually similar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neither was it sufficient to manually adjust the hearing-aid insertion gain, nor was it sufficient to add an additional bandwidth limitation to the recordings. Only after the application of an inverse filter the perceptual differences between recordings were removed adequately.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was possible to level the ground between different hearing devices, so to speak. This will allow future research to evaluate the sound quality of nonlinear signal processing features.</p>","PeriodicalId":48972,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Amplification","volume":"15 1","pages":"77-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1084713811413303","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A method to remove differences in frequency response between commercial hearing aids to allow direct comparison of the sound quality of hearing-aid features.\",\"authors\":\"Rolph Houben,&nbsp;Inge Brons,&nbsp;Wouter A Dreschler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1084713811413303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>We want to remove differences in frequency response between different commercial hearing aids so that we can compare the sound quality of signal processing features from different hearing-aid in a future paired-comparison set-up. More specifically, we want to control for the confounding effects of the linear hearing aid response when evaluating nonlinear processing. This article presents a control procedure and evaluates its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We increased the similarity of hearing-aid recordings in three steps and used both an objective quality metric and listening tests to investigate if the recordings from different hearing aids were perceptually similar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neither was it sufficient to manually adjust the hearing-aid insertion gain, nor was it sufficient to add an additional bandwidth limitation to the recordings. Only after the application of an inverse filter the perceptual differences between recordings were removed adequately.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was possible to level the ground between different hearing devices, so to speak. This will allow future research to evaluate the sound quality of nonlinear signal processing features.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Amplification\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"77-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1084713811413303\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Amplification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713811413303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/11/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Amplification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713811413303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目标:我们希望消除不同商业助听器之间的频率响应差异,以便我们可以在未来的配对比较设置中比较不同助听器的信号处理功能的音质。更具体地说,我们希望在评估非线性处理时控制线性助听器响应的混杂效应。本文提出了一种控制程序,并对其有效性进行了评价。方法:我们分三步提高助听器录音的相似性,并使用客观质量度量和听力测试来调查不同助听器录音在感知上是否相似。结果:手动调整助听器插入增益也不够,在录音中增加额外的带宽限制也不够。只有在应用反向滤波器后,记录之间的感知差异才被充分去除。结论:可以说,不同助听器之间的地面平整是可能的。这将使未来的研究能够评估非线性信号处理特征的音质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A method to remove differences in frequency response between commercial hearing aids to allow direct comparison of the sound quality of hearing-aid features.

Goal: We want to remove differences in frequency response between different commercial hearing aids so that we can compare the sound quality of signal processing features from different hearing-aid in a future paired-comparison set-up. More specifically, we want to control for the confounding effects of the linear hearing aid response when evaluating nonlinear processing. This article presents a control procedure and evaluates its effectiveness.

Method: We increased the similarity of hearing-aid recordings in three steps and used both an objective quality metric and listening tests to investigate if the recordings from different hearing aids were perceptually similar.

Results: Neither was it sufficient to manually adjust the hearing-aid insertion gain, nor was it sufficient to add an additional bandwidth limitation to the recordings. Only after the application of an inverse filter the perceptual differences between recordings were removed adequately.

Conclusion: It was possible to level the ground between different hearing devices, so to speak. This will allow future research to evaluate the sound quality of nonlinear signal processing features.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Amplification
Trends in Amplification AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids. Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS. The perception of telephone-processed speech by combined electric and acoustic stimulation. The master hearing aid. How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1