{"title":"一种评估肺年龄的新方法。","authors":"Kazuhiro Yamaguchi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>As part of the enlightenment campaign for COPD and for the introduction of an easy method to assess aging phenomena in respiratory function, the indicator of lung age has been suggested by the JRS Lung-Age-Spread-Promotion Secretariat (original method). In this original method, the lung age was estimated by counting back the regression formula predicting the reference value of FEV1. Since the normal value of FEV1 at a given age is not unique and exists within a certain range defined as the 95% confidence limit, the backward value of lung age calculated with the original method includes various statistical and physiological problems. In the present study, I proposed a novel method allowing estimation of lung age, in which the problems related to the original method were significantly overcome.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Since the 95% confidence limit of FEV1 was not considered in the original method, the lung age of a person with high FEV1 beyond the upper end of the 95% confidence limit would result in the subject being classified as remarkably young (sometimes, the calculated lung age is below zero), while that of a person with reduced FEV1 below the lower end of the 95% confidence limit would be estimated as being very elderly (sometimes, the calculated age is over 100). On the other hand, the novel method reasonably deliberates the 95% confidence limit, leading to the conclusion that it could be applied for estimating the lung age of persons having a wide range of FEV1.</p>","PeriodicalId":19218,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = the journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society","volume":"49 9","pages":"713-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A new method for evaluating lung age].\",\"authors\":\"Kazuhiro Yamaguchi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>As part of the enlightenment campaign for COPD and for the introduction of an easy method to assess aging phenomena in respiratory function, the indicator of lung age has been suggested by the JRS Lung-Age-Spread-Promotion Secretariat (original method). In this original method, the lung age was estimated by counting back the regression formula predicting the reference value of FEV1. Since the normal value of FEV1 at a given age is not unique and exists within a certain range defined as the 95% confidence limit, the backward value of lung age calculated with the original method includes various statistical and physiological problems. In the present study, I proposed a novel method allowing estimation of lung age, in which the problems related to the original method were significantly overcome.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Since the 95% confidence limit of FEV1 was not considered in the original method, the lung age of a person with high FEV1 beyond the upper end of the 95% confidence limit would result in the subject being classified as remarkably young (sometimes, the calculated lung age is below zero), while that of a person with reduced FEV1 below the lower end of the 95% confidence limit would be estimated as being very elderly (sometimes, the calculated age is over 100). On the other hand, the novel method reasonably deliberates the 95% confidence limit, leading to the conclusion that it could be applied for estimating the lung age of persons having a wide range of FEV1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = the journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society\",\"volume\":\"49 9\",\"pages\":\"713-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = the journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = the journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:作为COPD启蒙运动的一部分,为了引入一种简便的方法来评估呼吸功能老化现象,JRS lung - age - spread - promotion Secretariat(原始方法)提出了肺年龄指标。在最初的方法中,肺年龄是通过计算预测FEV1参考值的回归公式来估计的。由于给定年龄的FEV1正常值不是唯一的,而是存在于95%置信限的一定范围内,因此用原方法计算的肺年龄的反演值包含了各种统计和生理问题。在本研究中,我提出了一种新的肺年龄估计方法,该方法明显克服了原方法相关的问题。结果和结论:95%置信上限后FEV1在原始的方法,没有考虑一个人的肺年龄高残超出的95%置信上限会导致主体被列为非常年轻(有时,计算肺年龄低于零),而下面的人以减少残的95%置信下限估计会非常老年人(有时,计算年龄超过100)。另一方面,新方法合理地考虑了95%的置信限,从而得出结论,该方法可用于估计FEV1范围较大的人的肺年龄。
Background and objective: As part of the enlightenment campaign for COPD and for the introduction of an easy method to assess aging phenomena in respiratory function, the indicator of lung age has been suggested by the JRS Lung-Age-Spread-Promotion Secretariat (original method). In this original method, the lung age was estimated by counting back the regression formula predicting the reference value of FEV1. Since the normal value of FEV1 at a given age is not unique and exists within a certain range defined as the 95% confidence limit, the backward value of lung age calculated with the original method includes various statistical and physiological problems. In the present study, I proposed a novel method allowing estimation of lung age, in which the problems related to the original method were significantly overcome.
Results and conclusions: Since the 95% confidence limit of FEV1 was not considered in the original method, the lung age of a person with high FEV1 beyond the upper end of the 95% confidence limit would result in the subject being classified as remarkably young (sometimes, the calculated lung age is below zero), while that of a person with reduced FEV1 below the lower end of the 95% confidence limit would be estimated as being very elderly (sometimes, the calculated age is over 100). On the other hand, the novel method reasonably deliberates the 95% confidence limit, leading to the conclusion that it could be applied for estimating the lung age of persons having a wide range of FEV1.