唇部和舌部矫治器治疗患者疼痛的比较。

Abby K Y Wu, Colman P J McGrath, Ricky W K Wong, A Bakr M Rabie, D Wiechmann
{"title":"唇部和舌部矫治器治疗患者疼痛的比较。","authors":"Abby K Y Wu,&nbsp;Colman P J McGrath,&nbsp;Ricky W K Wong,&nbsp;A Bakr M Rabie,&nbsp;D Wiechmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>There has been a paradigm shift within orthodontics in the use of lingual fixed appliances compared with the use of labial fixed appliances on the basis of perceived benefits and acceptance by patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A matched case-control prospective longitudinal study of adult patients treated in the Orthodontic Department, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Hong Kong. Group A consisted of 30 patients treated with lingual orthodontic appliances. Group B consisted of 30 patients treated with labial orthodontic appliances. Data were collected at five different time points using questionnaire: pre-treatment; one week after the placement of the fixed appliance, and then at 1-month, 3-months, and 6-months thereafter. The questionnaire consisted of 15 items, in which 11 items were rated on a visual analogue scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' experience of pain decreased over the study period (p < 0.001); Those treated with lingual appliances reported significantly greater pain experience than those treated with labial appliances with respect to tongue pain (p < 0.001). However, those treated with labial appliances reported experiencing significantly more lip pain (p < 0.01), cheek pain (p < 0.001), and gum pain (p < 0.05). Patients treated with lingual appliances reported experiencing pain earlier on than those treated with labial appliances (p < 0.05). Both groups reported the pain level to be the same throughout the day (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in reported disturbance of sleep or analgesic consumption between the two groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients treated with both labial and lingual orthodontic appliances experienced pain during treatment, but this decreased over the treatment period. Patients treated with lingual appliances experienced more tongue pain whereas those treated with labial appliances experienced more lip, cheek and gum pain. Patients treated with lingual appliance reported experiencing pain earlier on than those treated with labial appliances.</p>","PeriodicalId":75517,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons","volume":"19 ","pages":"176-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of pain experienced by patients treated with labial and lingual orthodontic appliances.\",\"authors\":\"Abby K Y Wu,&nbsp;Colman P J McGrath,&nbsp;Ricky W K Wong,&nbsp;A Bakr M Rabie,&nbsp;D Wiechmann\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>There has been a paradigm shift within orthodontics in the use of lingual fixed appliances compared with the use of labial fixed appliances on the basis of perceived benefits and acceptance by patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A matched case-control prospective longitudinal study of adult patients treated in the Orthodontic Department, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Hong Kong. Group A consisted of 30 patients treated with lingual orthodontic appliances. Group B consisted of 30 patients treated with labial orthodontic appliances. Data were collected at five different time points using questionnaire: pre-treatment; one week after the placement of the fixed appliance, and then at 1-month, 3-months, and 6-months thereafter. The questionnaire consisted of 15 items, in which 11 items were rated on a visual analogue scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' experience of pain decreased over the study period (p < 0.001); Those treated with lingual appliances reported significantly greater pain experience than those treated with labial appliances with respect to tongue pain (p < 0.001). However, those treated with labial appliances reported experiencing significantly more lip pain (p < 0.01), cheek pain (p < 0.001), and gum pain (p < 0.05). Patients treated with lingual appliances reported experiencing pain earlier on than those treated with labial appliances (p < 0.05). Both groups reported the pain level to be the same throughout the day (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in reported disturbance of sleep or analgesic consumption between the two groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients treated with both labial and lingual orthodontic appliances experienced pain during treatment, but this decreased over the treatment period. Patients treated with lingual appliances experienced more tongue pain whereas those treated with labial appliances experienced more lip, cheek and gum pain. Patients treated with lingual appliance reported experiencing pain earlier on than those treated with labial appliances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"176-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未标记:与使用唇部固定矫治器相比,正畸学中使用舌部固定矫治器的模式发生了转变,这是基于患者感知到的益处和接受程度。方法:对在香港菲腊牙科医院正畸科治疗的成年患者进行配对病例对照前瞻性纵向研究。A组30例患者采用舌正畸矫治器治疗。B组采用唇部矫治器治疗30例。采用问卷法在5个不同时间点收集数据:预处理;固定矫治器放置后一周,以及放置后1个月、3个月和6个月。问卷共15个项目,其中11个项目采用视觉模拟量表进行评分。结果:患者的疼痛体验在研究期间减少(p < 0.001);使用舌部矫治器治疗的患者报告的疼痛体验明显大于使用唇部矫治器治疗的患者(p < 0.001)。然而,使用唇部矫治器的患者报告有明显更多的唇痛(p < 0.01)、脸颊痛(p < 0.001)和牙龈痛(p < 0.05)。使用舌部矫治器的患者比使用唇部矫治器的患者更早出现疼痛(p < 0.05)。两组患者全天疼痛程度相同(p > 0.05)。两组患者报告的睡眠障碍和镇痛药消耗无显著差异(p > 0.05)。结论:同时使用唇部和舌部矫治器的患者在治疗过程中会出现疼痛,但在治疗期间疼痛有所减少。用舌部矫治器治疗的患者有更多的舌头疼痛,而用唇部矫治器治疗的患者有更多的嘴唇、脸颊和牙龈疼痛。用舌部矫治器治疗的患者比用唇部矫治器治疗的患者报告更早地经历疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of pain experienced by patients treated with labial and lingual orthodontic appliances.

Unlabelled: There has been a paradigm shift within orthodontics in the use of lingual fixed appliances compared with the use of labial fixed appliances on the basis of perceived benefits and acceptance by patients.

Methods: A matched case-control prospective longitudinal study of adult patients treated in the Orthodontic Department, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Hong Kong. Group A consisted of 30 patients treated with lingual orthodontic appliances. Group B consisted of 30 patients treated with labial orthodontic appliances. Data were collected at five different time points using questionnaire: pre-treatment; one week after the placement of the fixed appliance, and then at 1-month, 3-months, and 6-months thereafter. The questionnaire consisted of 15 items, in which 11 items were rated on a visual analogue scale.

Results: Patients' experience of pain decreased over the study period (p < 0.001); Those treated with lingual appliances reported significantly greater pain experience than those treated with labial appliances with respect to tongue pain (p < 0.001). However, those treated with labial appliances reported experiencing significantly more lip pain (p < 0.01), cheek pain (p < 0.001), and gum pain (p < 0.05). Patients treated with lingual appliances reported experiencing pain earlier on than those treated with labial appliances (p < 0.05). Both groups reported the pain level to be the same throughout the day (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in reported disturbance of sleep or analgesic consumption between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Patients treated with both labial and lingual orthodontic appliances experienced pain during treatment, but this decreased over the treatment period. Patients treated with lingual appliances experienced more tongue pain whereas those treated with labial appliances experienced more lip, cheek and gum pain. Patients treated with lingual appliance reported experiencing pain earlier on than those treated with labial appliances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral health and integrated care--the generational challenge. Address by the President of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons Werner H Bischof, BDSc, MDSc, FRACDS, MRACDS (perio), FPFA, FICD at the Opening Ceremony. Periodontal diseases: basic concepts, association with systemic health, and contemporary studies of pathobiology. "MI" caries management--an overview. The mutilated dentition--management of the debilitated dentition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1