压疮患者的能量平衡:观察性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析

Emanuele Cereda MD, PhD, Catherine Klersy MD, MSc, Mariangela Rondanelli MD, PhD, Riccardo Caccialanza MD
{"title":"压疮患者的能量平衡:观察性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Emanuele Cereda MD, PhD,&nbsp;Catherine Klersy MD, MSc,&nbsp;Mariangela Rondanelli MD, PhD,&nbsp;Riccardo Caccialanza MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Medical nutrition therapy is reported to contribute to wound healing. However, effective intervention requires an accurate estimation of individual energy needs, which, in turn, relies on accurate methods of assessment. The primary aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to evaluate the resting energy expenditure (REE) of patients with pressure ulcers (PUs) compared to matched control groups and the potential estimation bias of REE predictive equations. The recommended daily energy requirements of patients with PUs were also assessed, along with their energy balance (daily energy requirement vs intake). All language, original, full-text research articles published between January 1, 1950, and July 31, 2010, were searched through electronic databases. Relevant studies were also identified by reviewing citations. Observational (case-control and case-series) studies providing data on measured REE were initially included. Data extracted were measured REE, predicted REE, and daily energy intake. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to controls (n=101), patients with PUs (n=92) presented higher measured REE (weighted mean 20.7±0.8 vs 23.7±2.2 kcal/kg/day; <em>P</em>&lt;0.0001). In these patients, measured REE was also higher than predicted REE (calculated using the Harris-Benedict formula in all studies; 21.0±1.0 kcal/kg/day; <em>P</em>&lt;0.0001), whereas energy intake (n=78; 21.7±3.1 kcal/kg/day) was significantly lower (<em>P</em>&lt;0.0001) than total daily requirement, which was calculated as 29.4±2.7 kcal/kg/day. Patients with PUs are characterized by increased REE and reduced energy intake. In the estimation of REE using the Harris-Benedict formula, a correction factor (×1.1) should be considered to accurately assess energy needs. Moreover, an energy intake of 30 kcal/kg/day seems appropriate to cover the daily requirements of patients with PUs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.005","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy Balance in Patients with Pressure Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies\",\"authors\":\"Emanuele Cereda MD, PhD,&nbsp;Catherine Klersy MD, MSc,&nbsp;Mariangela Rondanelli MD, PhD,&nbsp;Riccardo Caccialanza MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Medical nutrition therapy is reported to contribute to wound healing. However, effective intervention requires an accurate estimation of individual energy needs, which, in turn, relies on accurate methods of assessment. The primary aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to evaluate the resting energy expenditure (REE) of patients with pressure ulcers (PUs) compared to matched control groups and the potential estimation bias of REE predictive equations. The recommended daily energy requirements of patients with PUs were also assessed, along with their energy balance (daily energy requirement vs intake). All language, original, full-text research articles published between January 1, 1950, and July 31, 2010, were searched through electronic databases. Relevant studies were also identified by reviewing citations. Observational (case-control and case-series) studies providing data on measured REE were initially included. Data extracted were measured REE, predicted REE, and daily energy intake. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to controls (n=101), patients with PUs (n=92) presented higher measured REE (weighted mean 20.7±0.8 vs 23.7±2.2 kcal/kg/day; <em>P</em>&lt;0.0001). In these patients, measured REE was also higher than predicted REE (calculated using the Harris-Benedict formula in all studies; 21.0±1.0 kcal/kg/day; <em>P</em>&lt;0.0001), whereas energy intake (n=78; 21.7±3.1 kcal/kg/day) was significantly lower (<em>P</em>&lt;0.0001) than total daily requirement, which was calculated as 29.4±2.7 kcal/kg/day. Patients with PUs are characterized by increased REE and reduced energy intake. In the estimation of REE using the Harris-Benedict formula, a correction factor (×1.1) should be considered to accurately assess energy needs. Moreover, an energy intake of 30 kcal/kg/day seems appropriate to cover the daily requirements of patients with PUs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The American Dietetic Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.005\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The American Dietetic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822311015471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822311015471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

摘要

据报道,医学营养疗法有助于伤口愈合。然而,有效的干预需要准确估计个人的能源需求,而这又依赖于准确的评估方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析的主要目的是评估压疮(PUs)患者的静息能量消耗(REE)与匹配对照组的比较,以及REE预测方程的潜在估计偏差。还评估了脓液患者的推荐每日能量需求,以及他们的能量平衡(每日能量需求与摄入量)。在1950年1月1日至2010年7月31日期间发表的所有语言、原创、全文研究论文都通过电子数据库进行了检索。还通过查阅引文确定了相关研究。最初纳入了提供稀土元素测量数据的观察性研究(病例对照和病例系列)。提取的数据包括测量的稀土元素、预测的稀土元素和每日能量摄入量。荟萃分析纳入了五项研究。与对照组(n=101)相比,脓液患者(n=92)的REE测量值更高(加权平均值为20.7±0.8 vs 23.7±2.2 kcal/kg/day;术中,0.0001)。在这些患者中,测量到的REE也高于预测的REE(在所有研究中使用Harris-Benedict公式计算;21.0±1.0千卡/公斤/天;P<0.0001),而能量摄入(n=78;(21.7±3.1 kcal/kg/day)显著低于总日需要量(29.4±2.7 kcal/kg/day) (P<0.0001)。脓毒症患者的特征是稀土元素增加和能量摄入减少。在使用Harris-Benedict公式估算稀土元素时,应考虑校正因子(×1.1)以准确评估能源需求。此外,30千卡/公斤/天的能量摄入似乎可以满足脓肿患者的日常需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Energy Balance in Patients with Pressure Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Medical nutrition therapy is reported to contribute to wound healing. However, effective intervention requires an accurate estimation of individual energy needs, which, in turn, relies on accurate methods of assessment. The primary aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to evaluate the resting energy expenditure (REE) of patients with pressure ulcers (PUs) compared to matched control groups and the potential estimation bias of REE predictive equations. The recommended daily energy requirements of patients with PUs were also assessed, along with their energy balance (daily energy requirement vs intake). All language, original, full-text research articles published between January 1, 1950, and July 31, 2010, were searched through electronic databases. Relevant studies were also identified by reviewing citations. Observational (case-control and case-series) studies providing data on measured REE were initially included. Data extracted were measured REE, predicted REE, and daily energy intake. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to controls (n=101), patients with PUs (n=92) presented higher measured REE (weighted mean 20.7±0.8 vs 23.7±2.2 kcal/kg/day; P<0.0001). In these patients, measured REE was also higher than predicted REE (calculated using the Harris-Benedict formula in all studies; 21.0±1.0 kcal/kg/day; P<0.0001), whereas energy intake (n=78; 21.7±3.1 kcal/kg/day) was significantly lower (P<0.0001) than total daily requirement, which was calculated as 29.4±2.7 kcal/kg/day. Patients with PUs are characterized by increased REE and reduced energy intake. In the estimation of REE using the Harris-Benedict formula, a correction factor (×1.1) should be considered to accurately assess energy needs. Moreover, an energy intake of 30 kcal/kg/day seems appropriate to cover the daily requirements of patients with PUs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Infant Feeding Practices What about corn oil? Program Outline Overweight Children Good reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1