{"title":"压疮患者的能量平衡:观察性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Emanuele Cereda MD, PhD, Catherine Klersy MD, MSc, Mariangela Rondanelli MD, PhD, Riccardo Caccialanza MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Medical nutrition therapy is reported to contribute to wound healing. However, effective intervention requires an accurate estimation of individual energy needs, which, in turn, relies on accurate methods of assessment. The primary aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to evaluate the resting energy expenditure (REE) of patients with pressure ulcers (PUs) compared to matched control groups and the potential estimation bias of REE predictive equations. The recommended daily energy requirements of patients with PUs were also assessed, along with their energy balance (daily energy requirement vs intake). All language, original, full-text research articles published between January 1, 1950, and July 31, 2010, were searched through electronic databases. Relevant studies were also identified by reviewing citations. Observational (case-control and case-series) studies providing data on measured REE were initially included. Data extracted were measured REE, predicted REE, and daily energy intake. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to controls (n=101), patients with PUs (n=92) presented higher measured REE (weighted mean 20.7±0.8 vs 23.7±2.2 kcal/kg/day; <em>P</em><0.0001). In these patients, measured REE was also higher than predicted REE (calculated using the Harris-Benedict formula in all studies; 21.0±1.0 kcal/kg/day; <em>P</em><0.0001), whereas energy intake (n=78; 21.7±3.1 kcal/kg/day) was significantly lower (<em>P</em><0.0001) than total daily requirement, which was calculated as 29.4±2.7 kcal/kg/day. Patients with PUs are characterized by increased REE and reduced energy intake. In the estimation of REE using the Harris-Benedict formula, a correction factor (×1.1) should be considered to accurately assess energy needs. Moreover, an energy intake of 30 kcal/kg/day seems appropriate to cover the daily requirements of patients with PUs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.005","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy Balance in Patients with Pressure Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies\",\"authors\":\"Emanuele Cereda MD, PhD, Catherine Klersy MD, MSc, Mariangela Rondanelli MD, PhD, Riccardo Caccialanza MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Medical nutrition therapy is reported to contribute to wound healing. However, effective intervention requires an accurate estimation of individual energy needs, which, in turn, relies on accurate methods of assessment. The primary aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to evaluate the resting energy expenditure (REE) of patients with pressure ulcers (PUs) compared to matched control groups and the potential estimation bias of REE predictive equations. The recommended daily energy requirements of patients with PUs were also assessed, along with their energy balance (daily energy requirement vs intake). All language, original, full-text research articles published between January 1, 1950, and July 31, 2010, were searched through electronic databases. Relevant studies were also identified by reviewing citations. Observational (case-control and case-series) studies providing data on measured REE were initially included. Data extracted were measured REE, predicted REE, and daily energy intake. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to controls (n=101), patients with PUs (n=92) presented higher measured REE (weighted mean 20.7±0.8 vs 23.7±2.2 kcal/kg/day; <em>P</em><0.0001). In these patients, measured REE was also higher than predicted REE (calculated using the Harris-Benedict formula in all studies; 21.0±1.0 kcal/kg/day; <em>P</em><0.0001), whereas energy intake (n=78; 21.7±3.1 kcal/kg/day) was significantly lower (<em>P</em><0.0001) than total daily requirement, which was calculated as 29.4±2.7 kcal/kg/day. Patients with PUs are characterized by increased REE and reduced energy intake. In the estimation of REE using the Harris-Benedict formula, a correction factor (×1.1) should be considered to accurately assess energy needs. Moreover, an energy intake of 30 kcal/kg/day seems appropriate to cover the daily requirements of patients with PUs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The American Dietetic Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.005\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The American Dietetic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822311015471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822311015471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51
摘要
据报道,医学营养疗法有助于伤口愈合。然而,有效的干预需要准确估计个人的能源需求,而这又依赖于准确的评估方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析的主要目的是评估压疮(PUs)患者的静息能量消耗(REE)与匹配对照组的比较,以及REE预测方程的潜在估计偏差。还评估了脓液患者的推荐每日能量需求,以及他们的能量平衡(每日能量需求与摄入量)。在1950年1月1日至2010年7月31日期间发表的所有语言、原创、全文研究论文都通过电子数据库进行了检索。还通过查阅引文确定了相关研究。最初纳入了提供稀土元素测量数据的观察性研究(病例对照和病例系列)。提取的数据包括测量的稀土元素、预测的稀土元素和每日能量摄入量。荟萃分析纳入了五项研究。与对照组(n=101)相比,脓液患者(n=92)的REE测量值更高(加权平均值为20.7±0.8 vs 23.7±2.2 kcal/kg/day;术中,0.0001)。在这些患者中,测量到的REE也高于预测的REE(在所有研究中使用Harris-Benedict公式计算;21.0±1.0千卡/公斤/天;P<0.0001),而能量摄入(n=78;(21.7±3.1 kcal/kg/day)显著低于总日需要量(29.4±2.7 kcal/kg/day) (P<0.0001)。脓毒症患者的特征是稀土元素增加和能量摄入减少。在使用Harris-Benedict公式估算稀土元素时,应考虑校正因子(×1.1)以准确评估能源需求。此外,30千卡/公斤/天的能量摄入似乎可以满足脓肿患者的日常需求。
Energy Balance in Patients with Pressure Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
Medical nutrition therapy is reported to contribute to wound healing. However, effective intervention requires an accurate estimation of individual energy needs, which, in turn, relies on accurate methods of assessment. The primary aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to evaluate the resting energy expenditure (REE) of patients with pressure ulcers (PUs) compared to matched control groups and the potential estimation bias of REE predictive equations. The recommended daily energy requirements of patients with PUs were also assessed, along with their energy balance (daily energy requirement vs intake). All language, original, full-text research articles published between January 1, 1950, and July 31, 2010, were searched through electronic databases. Relevant studies were also identified by reviewing citations. Observational (case-control and case-series) studies providing data on measured REE were initially included. Data extracted were measured REE, predicted REE, and daily energy intake. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to controls (n=101), patients with PUs (n=92) presented higher measured REE (weighted mean 20.7±0.8 vs 23.7±2.2 kcal/kg/day; P<0.0001). In these patients, measured REE was also higher than predicted REE (calculated using the Harris-Benedict formula in all studies; 21.0±1.0 kcal/kg/day; P<0.0001), whereas energy intake (n=78; 21.7±3.1 kcal/kg/day) was significantly lower (P<0.0001) than total daily requirement, which was calculated as 29.4±2.7 kcal/kg/day. Patients with PUs are characterized by increased REE and reduced energy intake. In the estimation of REE using the Harris-Benedict formula, a correction factor (×1.1) should be considered to accurately assess energy needs. Moreover, an energy intake of 30 kcal/kg/day seems appropriate to cover the daily requirements of patients with PUs.