低水平激光治疗颞下颌疾病的有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Journal of orofacial pain Pub Date : 2011-01-01
Ambra Petrucci, Fabrizio Sgolastra, Roberto Gatto, Antonella Mattei, Annalisa Monaco
{"title":"低水平激光治疗颞下颌疾病的有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ambra Petrucci,&nbsp;Fabrizio Sgolastra,&nbsp;Roberto Gatto,&nbsp;Antonella Mattei,&nbsp;Annalisa Monaco","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the scientific evidence on the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases of PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, and PEDro were manually and electronically searched up to February 2010. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and assessed the quality of the publications. A meta-analysis- was performed to quantify the pooled effect of LLLT on pain and function in patients with chronic TMD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search identified 323 papers without overlap between selected databases, but after the two-phase study selection, only six randomized clinical trials (RCT) were included in the systematic review. The primary outcome of interest was the change in pain from baseline to endpoint. The pooled effect of LLLT on pain, measured through a visual analog scale with a mean difference of 7.77 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.49 to 18.02), was not statistically significant from placebo. Change from baseline to endpoint of secondary outcomes was 4.04 mm (95% CI 3.06 to 5.02) for mandibular maximum vertical opening; 1.64 mm (95% CI 0.10 to 3.17) for right lateral excursion and 1.90 mm (95% CI: -4.08 to 7.88) for left lateral excursion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Currently, there is no evidence to support the effectiveness of LLLT in the treatment of TMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"25 4","pages":"298-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ambra Petrucci,&nbsp;Fabrizio Sgolastra,&nbsp;Roberto Gatto,&nbsp;Antonella Mattei,&nbsp;Annalisa Monaco\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the scientific evidence on the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases of PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, and PEDro were manually and electronically searched up to February 2010. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and assessed the quality of the publications. A meta-analysis- was performed to quantify the pooled effect of LLLT on pain and function in patients with chronic TMD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search identified 323 papers without overlap between selected databases, but after the two-phase study selection, only six randomized clinical trials (RCT) were included in the systematic review. The primary outcome of interest was the change in pain from baseline to endpoint. The pooled effect of LLLT on pain, measured through a visual analog scale with a mean difference of 7.77 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.49 to 18.02), was not statistically significant from placebo. Change from baseline to endpoint of secondary outcomes was 4.04 mm (95% CI 3.06 to 5.02) for mandibular maximum vertical opening; 1.64 mm (95% CI 0.10 to 3.17) for right lateral excursion and 1.90 mm (95% CI: -4.08 to 7.88) for left lateral excursion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Currently, there is no evidence to support the effectiveness of LLLT in the treatment of TMD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orofacial pain\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"298-307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orofacial pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价低水平激光治疗颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)疗效的科学依据。方法:人工和电子检索PubMed、Science Direct、Cochrane Clinical Trials Register和PEDro数据库,检索时间截止到2010年2月。两位独立的审稿人筛选、提取并评估了出版物的质量。进行了一项荟萃分析,以量化LLLT对慢性TMD患者疼痛和功能的综合影响。结果:文献检索发现323篇论文,所选数据库之间无重叠,但在两期研究选择后,只有6项随机临床试验(RCT)被纳入系统评价。研究的主要终点是疼痛从基线到终点的变化。通过视觉模拟量表测量LLLT对疼痛的综合影响,平均差异为7.77 mm(95%可信区间[CI]: -2.49至18.02),与安慰剂相比无统计学意义。下颌最大垂直开口从基线到终点的次要结局变化为4.04 mm (95% CI 3.06至5.02);右侧偏移为1.64 mm (95% CI 0.10至3.17),左侧偏移为1.90 mm (95% CI: -4.08至7.88)。结论:目前尚无证据支持LLLT治疗TMD的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: To assess the scientific evidence on the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD).

Methods: The databases of PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, and PEDro were manually and electronically searched up to February 2010. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and assessed the quality of the publications. A meta-analysis- was performed to quantify the pooled effect of LLLT on pain and function in patients with chronic TMD.

Results: The literature search identified 323 papers without overlap between selected databases, but after the two-phase study selection, only six randomized clinical trials (RCT) were included in the systematic review. The primary outcome of interest was the change in pain from baseline to endpoint. The pooled effect of LLLT on pain, measured through a visual analog scale with a mean difference of 7.77 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.49 to 18.02), was not statistically significant from placebo. Change from baseline to endpoint of secondary outcomes was 4.04 mm (95% CI 3.06 to 5.02) for mandibular maximum vertical opening; 1.64 mm (95% CI 0.10 to 3.17) for right lateral excursion and 1.90 mm (95% CI: -4.08 to 7.88) for left lateral excursion.

Conclusion: Currently, there is no evidence to support the effectiveness of LLLT in the treatment of TMD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of orofacial pain
Journal of orofacial pain 医学-牙科与口腔外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Way forward Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating intraoral orthopedic appliances for temporomandibular disorders. Neuroplasticity in the adaptation to prosthodontic treatment. Temporomandibular disorder pain after whiplash trauma: a systematic review. Why seek treatment for temporomandibular disorder pain complaints? A study based on semi-structured interviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1