Eva Horová, Jiří Mazoch, Jiřina Hiigertová, Jan Kvasnička, Jan Skrha, Jan Soupal, Martin Prázný
{"title":"1型糖尿病患者急性高血糖不损害微血管反应性和内皮功能。","authors":"Eva Horová, Jiří Mazoch, Jiřina Hiigertová, Jan Kvasnička, Jan Skrha, Jan Soupal, Martin Prázný","doi":"10.1155/2012/851487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of acute glycemia increase on microvasculature and endothelium in Type 1 diabetes during hyperinsulinemic clamp.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Sixteen patients (51 ± 7 yrs) without complications were examined during iso- and hyperglycemic clamp (glucose increase 5.5 mmol·L(-1)). Insulin, lipid parameters, cell adhesion molecules and fibrinogen were analyzed. Microvascular reactivity (MVR) was measured by laser Doppler flowmetry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum perfusion and the velocity of perfusion increase during PORH were higher in hyperglycemia compared to baseline (47 ± 16 versus 40 ± 16 PU, P < 0.01, and 10.4 ± 16.5 versus 2.6 ± 1.5 PU·s(-1), P < 0.05, resp.). Time to the maximum perfusion during TH was shorter and velocity of perfusion increase during TH higher at hyperglycemia compared to isoglycemic phase (69 ± 15 versus 77 ± 16 s, P < 0.05, and 1.4 ± 0.8 versus 1.2 ± 0.7 PU·s(-1), P < 0.05, resp.). An inverse relationship was found between insulinemia and the time to maximum perfusion during PORH (r = -0.70, P = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acute glycemia did not impair microvascular reactivity in this clamp study in Type 1 diabetic patients. Our results suggest that insulin may play a significant role in the regulation of microvascular perfusion in patients with Type 1 diabetes through its vasodilation effect and can counteract the effect of acute glucose fluctuations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12109,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Diabetes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2012/851487","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute hyperglycemia does not impair microvascular reactivity and endothelial function during hyperinsulinemic isoglycemic and hyperglycemic clamp in type 1 diabetic patients.\",\"authors\":\"Eva Horová, Jiří Mazoch, Jiřina Hiigertová, Jan Kvasnička, Jan Skrha, Jan Soupal, Martin Prázný\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2012/851487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of acute glycemia increase on microvasculature and endothelium in Type 1 diabetes during hyperinsulinemic clamp.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Sixteen patients (51 ± 7 yrs) without complications were examined during iso- and hyperglycemic clamp (glucose increase 5.5 mmol·L(-1)). Insulin, lipid parameters, cell adhesion molecules and fibrinogen were analyzed. Microvascular reactivity (MVR) was measured by laser Doppler flowmetry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum perfusion and the velocity of perfusion increase during PORH were higher in hyperglycemia compared to baseline (47 ± 16 versus 40 ± 16 PU, P < 0.01, and 10.4 ± 16.5 versus 2.6 ± 1.5 PU·s(-1), P < 0.05, resp.). Time to the maximum perfusion during TH was shorter and velocity of perfusion increase during TH higher at hyperglycemia compared to isoglycemic phase (69 ± 15 versus 77 ± 16 s, P < 0.05, and 1.4 ± 0.8 versus 1.2 ± 0.7 PU·s(-1), P < 0.05, resp.). An inverse relationship was found between insulinemia and the time to maximum perfusion during PORH (r = -0.70, P = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acute glycemia did not impair microvascular reactivity in this clamp study in Type 1 diabetic patients. Our results suggest that insulin may play a significant role in the regulation of microvascular perfusion in patients with Type 1 diabetes through its vasodilation effect and can counteract the effect of acute glucose fluctuations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Diabetes Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2012/851487\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Diabetes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/851487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Diabetes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/851487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目的:探讨高胰岛素钳夹术中急性血糖升高对1型糖尿病微血管和内皮的影响。患者与方法:16例患者(51±7岁)在等高血糖钳夹术中(血糖升高5.5 mmol·L(-1))检查无并发症。分析胰岛素、脂质参数、细胞粘附分子及纤维蛋白原。用激光多普勒血流仪测定微血管反应性(MVR)。结果:与基线相比,高血糖时PORH的最大灌注和灌注增加速度更高(47±16比40±16 PU, P < 0.01; 10.4±16.5比2.6±1.5 PU·s(-1), P < 0.05,均有统计学意义)。与等糖期相比,高血糖期TH至最大灌注时间更短,灌注速度更快(69±15 vs 77±16 s, P < 0.05, 1.4±0.8 vs 1.2±0.7 PU·s, P < 0.05,均为P < 0.05)。胰岛素血症与PORH期间达到最大灌注时间呈负相关(r = -0.70, P = 0.007)。结论:在钳形研究中,急性血糖没有损害1型糖尿病患者的微血管反应性。我们的研究结果表明胰岛素可能通过其血管扩张作用在1型糖尿病患者微血管灌注的调节中发挥重要作用,并可以抵消急性血糖波动的影响。
Acute hyperglycemia does not impair microvascular reactivity and endothelial function during hyperinsulinemic isoglycemic and hyperglycemic clamp in type 1 diabetic patients.
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of acute glycemia increase on microvasculature and endothelium in Type 1 diabetes during hyperinsulinemic clamp.
Patients and methods: Sixteen patients (51 ± 7 yrs) without complications were examined during iso- and hyperglycemic clamp (glucose increase 5.5 mmol·L(-1)). Insulin, lipid parameters, cell adhesion molecules and fibrinogen were analyzed. Microvascular reactivity (MVR) was measured by laser Doppler flowmetry.
Results: Maximum perfusion and the velocity of perfusion increase during PORH were higher in hyperglycemia compared to baseline (47 ± 16 versus 40 ± 16 PU, P < 0.01, and 10.4 ± 16.5 versus 2.6 ± 1.5 PU·s(-1), P < 0.05, resp.). Time to the maximum perfusion during TH was shorter and velocity of perfusion increase during TH higher at hyperglycemia compared to isoglycemic phase (69 ± 15 versus 77 ± 16 s, P < 0.05, and 1.4 ± 0.8 versus 1.2 ± 0.7 PU·s(-1), P < 0.05, resp.). An inverse relationship was found between insulinemia and the time to maximum perfusion during PORH (r = -0.70, P = 0.007).
Conclusion: Acute glycemia did not impair microvascular reactivity in this clamp study in Type 1 diabetic patients. Our results suggest that insulin may play a significant role in the regulation of microvascular perfusion in patients with Type 1 diabetes through its vasodilation effect and can counteract the effect of acute glucose fluctuations.