使用非培养技术分析唾液微生物组。

Vladimir Lazarevic, Katrine Whiteson, Nadia Gaïa, Yann Gizard, David Hernandez, Laurent Farinelli, Magne Osterås, Patrice François, Jacques Schrenzel
{"title":"使用非培养技术分析唾液微生物组。","authors":"Vladimir Lazarevic,&nbsp;Katrine Whiteson,&nbsp;Nadia Gaïa,&nbsp;Yann Gizard,&nbsp;David Hernandez,&nbsp;Laurent Farinelli,&nbsp;Magne Osterås,&nbsp;Patrice François,&nbsp;Jacques Schrenzel","doi":"10.1186/2043-9113-2-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The salivary microbiota is a potential diagnostic indicator of several diseases. Culture-independent techniques are required to study the salivary microbial community since many of its members have not been cultivated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We explored the bacterial community composition in the saliva sample using metagenomic whole genome shotgun (WGS) sequencing, the extraction of 16S rRNA gene fragments from metagenomic sequences (16S-WGS) and high-throughput sequencing of PCR-amplified bacterial 16S rDNA gene (16S-HTS) regions V1 and V3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hierarchical clustering of data based on the relative abundance of bacterial genera revealed that distances between 16S-HTS datasets for V1 and V3 regions were greater than those obtained for the same V region with different numbers of PCR cycles. Datasets generated by 16S-HTS and 16S-WGS were even more distant. Finally, comparison of WGS and 16S-based datasets revealed the highest dissimilarity.The analysis of the 16S-HTS, WGS and 16S-WGS datasets revealed 206, 56 and 39 bacterial genera, respectively, 124 of which have not been previously identified in salivary microbiomes. A large fraction of DNA extracted from saliva corresponded to human DNA. Based on sequence similarity search against completely sequenced genomes, bacterial and viral sequences represented 0.73% and 0.0036% of the salivary metagenome, respectively. Several sequence reads were identified as parts of the human herpesvirus 7.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysis of the salivary metagenome may have implications in diagnostics e.g. in detection of microorganisms and viruses without designing specific tests for each pathogen.</p>","PeriodicalId":73663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical bioinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2043-9113-2-4","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the salivary microbiome using culture-independent techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir Lazarevic,&nbsp;Katrine Whiteson,&nbsp;Nadia Gaïa,&nbsp;Yann Gizard,&nbsp;David Hernandez,&nbsp;Laurent Farinelli,&nbsp;Magne Osterås,&nbsp;Patrice François,&nbsp;Jacques Schrenzel\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/2043-9113-2-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The salivary microbiota is a potential diagnostic indicator of several diseases. Culture-independent techniques are required to study the salivary microbial community since many of its members have not been cultivated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We explored the bacterial community composition in the saliva sample using metagenomic whole genome shotgun (WGS) sequencing, the extraction of 16S rRNA gene fragments from metagenomic sequences (16S-WGS) and high-throughput sequencing of PCR-amplified bacterial 16S rDNA gene (16S-HTS) regions V1 and V3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hierarchical clustering of data based on the relative abundance of bacterial genera revealed that distances between 16S-HTS datasets for V1 and V3 regions were greater than those obtained for the same V region with different numbers of PCR cycles. Datasets generated by 16S-HTS and 16S-WGS were even more distant. Finally, comparison of WGS and 16S-based datasets revealed the highest dissimilarity.The analysis of the 16S-HTS, WGS and 16S-WGS datasets revealed 206, 56 and 39 bacterial genera, respectively, 124 of which have not been previously identified in salivary microbiomes. A large fraction of DNA extracted from saliva corresponded to human DNA. Based on sequence similarity search against completely sequenced genomes, bacterial and viral sequences represented 0.73% and 0.0036% of the salivary metagenome, respectively. Several sequence reads were identified as parts of the human herpesvirus 7.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysis of the salivary metagenome may have implications in diagnostics e.g. in detection of microorganisms and viruses without designing specific tests for each pathogen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical bioinformatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2043-9113-2-4\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-2-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-2-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

摘要

背景:唾液微生物群是几种疾病的潜在诊断指标。由于唾液微生物群落的许多成员尚未被培养,因此研究唾液微生物群落需要非培养技术。方法:采用宏基因组全基因组霰弹枪(WGS)测序、提取宏基因组序列(16S-WGS)中的16S rRNA基因片段,并对pcr扩增的细菌16S rDNA基因(16S- hts) V1区和V3区进行高通量测序,研究唾液样本细菌群落组成。结果:根据细菌属的相对丰度对数据进行分层聚类,V1区和V3区16S-HTS数据集之间的距离大于不同PCR循环数下同一V区16S-HTS数据集之间的距离。16S-HTS和16S-WGS生成的数据集距离更远。最后,WGS和基于16s的数据集的比较显示出最大的差异。对16S-HTS、WGS和16S-WGS数据集的分析分别揭示了206、56和39个细菌属,其中124个以前未在唾液微生物组中发现。从唾液中提取的大部分DNA与人类DNA相符。基于全序列基因组的序列相似性搜索,细菌和病毒序列分别占唾液元基因组的0.73%和0.0036%。几个序列读数被鉴定为人类疱疹病毒7的一部分。结论:唾液宏基因组的分析可能对诊断有一定的意义,例如在不为每种病原体设计特异性检测的情况下检测微生物和病毒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of the salivary microbiome using culture-independent techniques.

Background: The salivary microbiota is a potential diagnostic indicator of several diseases. Culture-independent techniques are required to study the salivary microbial community since many of its members have not been cultivated.

Methods: We explored the bacterial community composition in the saliva sample using metagenomic whole genome shotgun (WGS) sequencing, the extraction of 16S rRNA gene fragments from metagenomic sequences (16S-WGS) and high-throughput sequencing of PCR-amplified bacterial 16S rDNA gene (16S-HTS) regions V1 and V3.

Results: The hierarchical clustering of data based on the relative abundance of bacterial genera revealed that distances between 16S-HTS datasets for V1 and V3 regions were greater than those obtained for the same V region with different numbers of PCR cycles. Datasets generated by 16S-HTS and 16S-WGS were even more distant. Finally, comparison of WGS and 16S-based datasets revealed the highest dissimilarity.The analysis of the 16S-HTS, WGS and 16S-WGS datasets revealed 206, 56 and 39 bacterial genera, respectively, 124 of which have not been previously identified in salivary microbiomes. A large fraction of DNA extracted from saliva corresponded to human DNA. Based on sequence similarity search against completely sequenced genomes, bacterial and viral sequences represented 0.73% and 0.0036% of the salivary metagenome, respectively. Several sequence reads were identified as parts of the human herpesvirus 7.

Conclusions: Analysis of the salivary metagenome may have implications in diagnostics e.g. in detection of microorganisms and viruses without designing specific tests for each pathogen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical research informatics (CRI): overview over new tools and services First Clinical Research Informatics (CRI) Solutions Day: advanced IT support from EU projects for clinical trials Mobile eHealth solution (ePRO) EHR4CR local workbench TRANSFoRm Data quality tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1