影响修复牙科治疗需求的因素,特别关注种植牙科。

Swedish dental journal. Supplement Pub Date : 2011-01-01
Birger Narby
{"title":"影响修复牙科治疗需求的因素,特别关注种植牙科。","authors":"Birger Narby","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The main aim of this thesis was to investigate how attitudes influence the latent and manifest need, desire, demand, and utilization for dental implant treatment, considering the gatekeeping process between need and demand, and between demand and utilization of dental treatment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A conceptual analysis of the need and demand concept from the literature was a first step in the study. A second step was to examine changes in attitudes toward desire for implant treatment over time, also in relation to dental status, in a population of middle aged and older individuals in Sweden based on two questionnaire studies, one in 1989 and the other in 1999 among the same 3000 participants. The individuals who responded both in 1989 and 1999 constituted a panel of 56% of the 1989 survey sample. Logistic regression models were done with desire of implant treatment as dependent variable. In paper V, a qualitative study using grounded theory was done on the treated patients' subjective perspective on receiving a fixed implant-supported denture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An emancipatory perspective with the patient-dentist dialogue was regarded as central for an optimal treatment result in the prosthetic treatment decision-making process. A main finding was that need is established only in a communicative dialogue with mutual respect between the profession and the patient. The study implied that the gatekeeping concept relates to a complex process rendering great differences between demand and actual utilization. The main result from the questionnaires was the huge increase in interest for implant-treatment from 1989 to 1999. In 1999 almost all (94%) of the study population expressed desire for implant treatment; as many as 92 % percent of those who did not express a desire for implants in 1989 had changed their mind 10 years later. The regression analysis showed that older people, non-city residents, and those with one or several missing and unreplaced teeth, changed desire for implant treatment between the study years. Effects of age, residence, and better dental status disappeared during the ten year study period. Those edentulous and those with removable dentures expressed less desire than those with all teeth remaining, or only one or a few teeth missing, in 1989. High income significantly increased the probability to desire implant treatment for the study panel at both study occasions. The qualitative study, using the method for grounded theory, gave as core category and main finding the importance of the patients' trust and confidence in the dentist and his/her staff, in the process of transforming desire for dental implant treatment into manifest demand, and also making it more likely for the patients' to become satisfied with the treatment result regardless of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no objective need in prosthodontic treatment. Manifest need and demand change over time, and are influenced by the patients' attitude and situation, and by the dentist's practice profile. True need can only be identified in a dialogue between the professional and the patient. Income and dental status, but not age, place of residence, nor concern for dental appearance, influence desire for implant treatment at the end of the studied 10-year period. Individuals with removable dentures, or those being edentulous in one or both jaws have a lower probability to desire implant treatment than those with all teeth remaining, or with missing teeth replaced by fixed partial dentures. The qualitative study underlined the importance of the relationship between the professional and the patient. The patients' trust and confidence in the dentist and his/her staff were decisive in the process of making a demand for implant treatment manifest and turning it into actual utilization. The informants from this study described their confidence and trust as dependent on a communicative dialogue with mutual respect between the patient and the professional.</p>","PeriodicalId":76572,"journal":{"name":"Swedish dental journal. Supplement","volume":" 218","pages":"3-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors shaping demand for prostethic dentistry treatment with special focus on implant dentistry.\",\"authors\":\"Birger Narby\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The main aim of this thesis was to investigate how attitudes influence the latent and manifest need, desire, demand, and utilization for dental implant treatment, considering the gatekeeping process between need and demand, and between demand and utilization of dental treatment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A conceptual analysis of the need and demand concept from the literature was a first step in the study. A second step was to examine changes in attitudes toward desire for implant treatment over time, also in relation to dental status, in a population of middle aged and older individuals in Sweden based on two questionnaire studies, one in 1989 and the other in 1999 among the same 3000 participants. The individuals who responded both in 1989 and 1999 constituted a panel of 56% of the 1989 survey sample. Logistic regression models were done with desire of implant treatment as dependent variable. In paper V, a qualitative study using grounded theory was done on the treated patients' subjective perspective on receiving a fixed implant-supported denture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An emancipatory perspective with the patient-dentist dialogue was regarded as central for an optimal treatment result in the prosthetic treatment decision-making process. A main finding was that need is established only in a communicative dialogue with mutual respect between the profession and the patient. The study implied that the gatekeeping concept relates to a complex process rendering great differences between demand and actual utilization. The main result from the questionnaires was the huge increase in interest for implant-treatment from 1989 to 1999. In 1999 almost all (94%) of the study population expressed desire for implant treatment; as many as 92 % percent of those who did not express a desire for implants in 1989 had changed their mind 10 years later. The regression analysis showed that older people, non-city residents, and those with one or several missing and unreplaced teeth, changed desire for implant treatment between the study years. Effects of age, residence, and better dental status disappeared during the ten year study period. Those edentulous and those with removable dentures expressed less desire than those with all teeth remaining, or only one or a few teeth missing, in 1989. High income significantly increased the probability to desire implant treatment for the study panel at both study occasions. The qualitative study, using the method for grounded theory, gave as core category and main finding the importance of the patients' trust and confidence in the dentist and his/her staff, in the process of transforming desire for dental implant treatment into manifest demand, and also making it more likely for the patients' to become satisfied with the treatment result regardless of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no objective need in prosthodontic treatment. Manifest need and demand change over time, and are influenced by the patients' attitude and situation, and by the dentist's practice profile. True need can only be identified in a dialogue between the professional and the patient. Income and dental status, but not age, place of residence, nor concern for dental appearance, influence desire for implant treatment at the end of the studied 10-year period. Individuals with removable dentures, or those being edentulous in one or both jaws have a lower probability to desire implant treatment than those with all teeth remaining, or with missing teeth replaced by fixed partial dentures. The qualitative study underlined the importance of the relationship between the professional and the patient. The patients' trust and confidence in the dentist and his/her staff were decisive in the process of making a demand for implant treatment manifest and turning it into actual utilization. The informants from this study described their confidence and trust as dependent on a communicative dialogue with mutual respect between the patient and the professional.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swedish dental journal. Supplement\",\"volume\":\" 218\",\"pages\":\"3-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swedish dental journal. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swedish dental journal. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的主要目的是探讨态度如何影响牙科种植治疗的潜在和显性需求、愿望、需求和利用,并考虑需求与需求之间以及需求与利用之间的守门过程。材料和方法:从文献中对需求和需求概念进行概念性分析是研究的第一步。第二步是根据1989年和1999年对同样3000名参与者进行的两项问卷调查,在瑞典的中老年人群中,对种植治疗愿望的态度随着时间的推移而变化,也与牙齿状况有关。1989年和1999年的受访者占1989年调查样本的56%。以种植体治疗意愿为因变量建立Logistic回归模型。论文V采用扎根理论对治疗患者接受固定种植义齿的主观视角进行了定性研究。结果:与患者-牙医对话的解放观点被认为是在修复治疗决策过程中获得最佳治疗结果的中心。一个主要的发现是,只有在专业人员和患者之间相互尊重的交流对话中才能建立需求。研究表明,把关概念是一个复杂的过程,需求和实际利用之间存在很大差异。问卷调查的主要结果是,从1989年到1999年,对种植治疗的兴趣大幅增加。1999年,几乎所有(94%)的研究人群都表示希望种植体治疗;在1989年没有表达隆胸愿望的人中,多达92%的人在10年后改变了主意。回归分析显示,在研究期间,老年人、非城市居民以及缺牙或多颗未补牙的人对种植治疗的渴望有所改变。在10年的研究期间,年龄、居住地和良好牙齿状况的影响消失。1989年的一项调查显示,无牙和戴活动假牙的人比全牙、一颗或几颗牙缺失的人表达了更少的愿望。在两种研究情况下,高收入显著增加了研究小组期望种植治疗的可能性。定性研究采用扎根理论的方法,将患者对牙医及其工作人员的信任和信心作为核心范畴和主要发现,在将种植牙治疗的愿望转化为明确需求的过程中,也使患者更有可能在不考虑并发症的情况下对治疗结果感到满意。结论:口腔修复治疗无客观需要。显性需要和需求随时间而变化,并受患者的态度和情况以及牙医的执业概况的影响。真正的需求只有在专业人员和病人之间的对话中才能确定。在研究的10年期间结束时,收入和牙齿状况,而不是年龄、居住地和对牙齿外观的关注,影响种植体治疗的愿望。使用活动假牙的人,或单侧或双侧无牙的人,比那些保留全部牙齿的人,或用固定部分假牙代替缺失牙齿的人,希望种植治疗的可能性更低。定性研究强调了专业人员和患者之间关系的重要性。患者对牙医及其工作人员的信任和信心是将种植体治疗需求表达出来并转化为实际利用的决定性因素。这项研究的举报人将他们的信心和信任描述为依赖于患者和专业人员之间相互尊重的沟通对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors shaping demand for prostethic dentistry treatment with special focus on implant dentistry.

Aim: The main aim of this thesis was to investigate how attitudes influence the latent and manifest need, desire, demand, and utilization for dental implant treatment, considering the gatekeeping process between need and demand, and between demand and utilization of dental treatment.

Material and methods: A conceptual analysis of the need and demand concept from the literature was a first step in the study. A second step was to examine changes in attitudes toward desire for implant treatment over time, also in relation to dental status, in a population of middle aged and older individuals in Sweden based on two questionnaire studies, one in 1989 and the other in 1999 among the same 3000 participants. The individuals who responded both in 1989 and 1999 constituted a panel of 56% of the 1989 survey sample. Logistic regression models were done with desire of implant treatment as dependent variable. In paper V, a qualitative study using grounded theory was done on the treated patients' subjective perspective on receiving a fixed implant-supported denture.

Results: An emancipatory perspective with the patient-dentist dialogue was regarded as central for an optimal treatment result in the prosthetic treatment decision-making process. A main finding was that need is established only in a communicative dialogue with mutual respect between the profession and the patient. The study implied that the gatekeeping concept relates to a complex process rendering great differences between demand and actual utilization. The main result from the questionnaires was the huge increase in interest for implant-treatment from 1989 to 1999. In 1999 almost all (94%) of the study population expressed desire for implant treatment; as many as 92 % percent of those who did not express a desire for implants in 1989 had changed their mind 10 years later. The regression analysis showed that older people, non-city residents, and those with one or several missing and unreplaced teeth, changed desire for implant treatment between the study years. Effects of age, residence, and better dental status disappeared during the ten year study period. Those edentulous and those with removable dentures expressed less desire than those with all teeth remaining, or only one or a few teeth missing, in 1989. High income significantly increased the probability to desire implant treatment for the study panel at both study occasions. The qualitative study, using the method for grounded theory, gave as core category and main finding the importance of the patients' trust and confidence in the dentist and his/her staff, in the process of transforming desire for dental implant treatment into manifest demand, and also making it more likely for the patients' to become satisfied with the treatment result regardless of complications.

Conclusion: There is no objective need in prosthodontic treatment. Manifest need and demand change over time, and are influenced by the patients' attitude and situation, and by the dentist's practice profile. True need can only be identified in a dialogue between the professional and the patient. Income and dental status, but not age, place of residence, nor concern for dental appearance, influence desire for implant treatment at the end of the studied 10-year period. Individuals with removable dentures, or those being edentulous in one or both jaws have a lower probability to desire implant treatment than those with all teeth remaining, or with missing teeth replaced by fixed partial dentures. The qualitative study underlined the importance of the relationship between the professional and the patient. The patients' trust and confidence in the dentist and his/her staff were decisive in the process of making a demand for implant treatment manifest and turning it into actual utilization. The informants from this study described their confidence and trust as dependent on a communicative dialogue with mutual respect between the patient and the professional.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental tooth clenching. A model for studying mechanisms of muscle pain. On implementation of an endodontic program. Evaluation of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion and orthodontic treatment. Effects on dental, skeletal and nasal structures and rhinological findings. Masticatory function and temporomandibular disorders in patients with dentofacial deformities. On dental caries and dental erosion in Swedish young adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1