样品储存对马血液交叉配型的影响。

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2012-05-01 Epub Date: 2012-03-28 DOI:10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00913.x
M Harris, R Nolen-Walston, W Ashton, M May, K Jackson, R Boston
{"title":"样品储存对马血液交叉配型的影响。","authors":"M Harris,&nbsp;R Nolen-Walston,&nbsp;W Ashton,&nbsp;M May,&nbsp;K Jackson,&nbsp;R Boston","doi":"10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00913.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood samples banked for up to 1 month are typically used to perform pretransfusion testing in humans and small animals, but this has not been validated using blood from horses.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Compatibility of equine blood samples is repeatable using fresh samples, and reproducible using donor blood samples stored for up to 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Six healthy adult horses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized, blinded experimental study. Immunologic compatibility of the blood of all horses was assessed using a major and minor saline agglutination and hemolysin crossmatch using blood samples refrigerated for 0-4 weeks and fresh blood from the same horses. Crossmatch results were scored and then compared to identify changes of compatibility in each of the 4 tests. In addition, repeatability of the crossmatch technique itself was assessed by performing 6 iterations of this procedure in immediate succession with fresh blood from 3 horses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in crossmatch results was found using fresh blood (P = .39-1.00). Reproducibility was poor using blood stored for 1-4 weeks, especially in tests using stored erythrocytes (major antigen crossmatches), with significant differences from baseline at all weeks (P < .05); 13 of these differences were positive, indicating poorer compatibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical importance: </strong>Equine blood crossmatching is repeatable using fresh blood, although decreased apparent compatibility after storage makes exclusion of compatible donors more likely than mistaken administration of incompatible blood. These data suggest that fresh samples should be collected from potential donors before crossmatching equine blood.</p>","PeriodicalId":17462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":"26 3","pages":"662-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00913.x","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of sample storage on blood crossmatching in horses.\",\"authors\":\"M Harris,&nbsp;R Nolen-Walston,&nbsp;W Ashton,&nbsp;M May,&nbsp;K Jackson,&nbsp;R Boston\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00913.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood samples banked for up to 1 month are typically used to perform pretransfusion testing in humans and small animals, but this has not been validated using blood from horses.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Compatibility of equine blood samples is repeatable using fresh samples, and reproducible using donor blood samples stored for up to 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Six healthy adult horses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized, blinded experimental study. Immunologic compatibility of the blood of all horses was assessed using a major and minor saline agglutination and hemolysin crossmatch using blood samples refrigerated for 0-4 weeks and fresh blood from the same horses. Crossmatch results were scored and then compared to identify changes of compatibility in each of the 4 tests. In addition, repeatability of the crossmatch technique itself was assessed by performing 6 iterations of this procedure in immediate succession with fresh blood from 3 horses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in crossmatch results was found using fresh blood (P = .39-1.00). Reproducibility was poor using blood stored for 1-4 weeks, especially in tests using stored erythrocytes (major antigen crossmatches), with significant differences from baseline at all weeks (P < .05); 13 of these differences were positive, indicating poorer compatibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical importance: </strong>Equine blood crossmatching is repeatable using fresh blood, although decreased apparent compatibility after storage makes exclusion of compatible donors more likely than mistaken administration of incompatible blood. These data suggest that fresh samples should be collected from potential donors before crossmatching equine blood.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"662-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00913.x\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00913.x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/3/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00913.x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

背景:通常使用储存长达1个月的血液样本对人类和小动物进行输血前检测,但尚未使用马的血液进行验证。假设:马血液样本的相容性使用新鲜样本可重复,使用储存长达4周的供体血液样本可重复。动物:六匹健康的成年马。方法:随机、盲法实验研究。所有马的血液的免疫相容性通过使用冷藏0-4周的血液样本和来自同一匹马的新鲜血液进行主要和次要的生理盐水凝集和溶血素交叉配伍来评估。对交叉匹配结果进行评分,然后进行比较,以确定每种测试中相容性的变化。此外,通过对3匹马的新鲜血液连续进行6次迭代,评估了交叉匹配技术本身的可重复性。结果:新鲜血液交叉配伍结果差异无统计学意义(P = 0.39 ~ 1.00)。使用储存1-4周的血液,特别是使用储存的红细胞(主要抗原交叉配型)进行的试验,重复性较差,在所有周均与基线有显著差异(P < 0.05);这些差异中有13个是阳性的,表明兼容性较差。结论和临床意义:马血液交叉配型可重复使用新鲜血液,尽管储存后明显的相容性下降使得排除相容供者比错误给药相容血液的可能性更大。这些数据表明,在交叉配型马血之前,应从潜在献血者处收集新鲜样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of sample storage on blood crossmatching in horses.

Background: Blood samples banked for up to 1 month are typically used to perform pretransfusion testing in humans and small animals, but this has not been validated using blood from horses.

Hypothesis: Compatibility of equine blood samples is repeatable using fresh samples, and reproducible using donor blood samples stored for up to 4 weeks.

Animals: Six healthy adult horses.

Methods: Randomized, blinded experimental study. Immunologic compatibility of the blood of all horses was assessed using a major and minor saline agglutination and hemolysin crossmatch using blood samples refrigerated for 0-4 weeks and fresh blood from the same horses. Crossmatch results were scored and then compared to identify changes of compatibility in each of the 4 tests. In addition, repeatability of the crossmatch technique itself was assessed by performing 6 iterations of this procedure in immediate succession with fresh blood from 3 horses.

Results: No significant difference in crossmatch results was found using fresh blood (P = .39-1.00). Reproducibility was poor using blood stored for 1-4 weeks, especially in tests using stored erythrocytes (major antigen crossmatches), with significant differences from baseline at all weeks (P < .05); 13 of these differences were positive, indicating poorer compatibility.

Conclusions and clinical importance: Equine blood crossmatching is repeatable using fresh blood, although decreased apparent compatibility after storage makes exclusion of compatible donors more likely than mistaken administration of incompatible blood. These data suggest that fresh samples should be collected from potential donors before crossmatching equine blood.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine Veterinary-General Veterinary
自引率
11.50%
发文量
243
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.
期刊最新文献
Dose-exposure-response of CARDALIS® (benazepril/spironolactone) on the classical and alternative arms of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in healthy dogs. Predictive factors associated with short-term mortality in cats with feline infectious peritonitis treated with remdesivir or GS-441524 or both. Diagnosis of naturally-occurring Cushing's syndrome by primary care veterinarians in selected European countries. Frequency and progression of azotemia during acute and chronic treatment of congestive heart failure in cats. Salivary peptidomic profiling of chronic gingivostomatitis in cats by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and nanoscale liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1