医院质量联盟肺炎措施与出院费用的关系。

Q4 Medicine Journal of Health Care Finance Pub Date : 2012-01-01
Shadi Saleh, Mark Callan, Kassem Kassak
{"title":"医院质量联盟肺炎措施与出院费用的关系。","authors":"Shadi Saleh,&nbsp;Mark Callan,&nbsp;Kassem Kassak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article examines the association between performance on the Hospital Quality Alliance's (HQA's) pneumonia measures and costs associated with pneumonia discharges.</p><p><strong>Study population: </strong>Patients with pneumonia discharges (primary pneumonia diagnosis, ICD-9 codes 480-487) in New York hospitals (n = 189) during 2005 (n = 48,574). Discharges were excluded if the patient was younger than 18, discharged dead, or was transferred in from or out to an acute care facility.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The study is cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>The study outcome measure was hospital-level pneumonia discharges-related costs. The main independent variable comprised hospitals' performance on the three HQA pneumonia measures that are part of the \"starter set.\" The hospital was the unit of analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of a composite score measure, as well as the three individual measures, allowed for the identification of some differential impact among the measures. For example, optimal performance on the oxygenation assessment measure was found to be negatively associated with discharge costs, whereas there was no significant association between the composite scores or each of the other two measures and costs. An observation worth noting is the borderline, significant inverse relationship between being in the top 10 percent performance category of the oxygenation assessment measures and reduced discharge costs, which persisted even after controlling for length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providers should not be dissuaded from actively engaging in quality improvement efforts due to concerns over the costs required to provide high quality care. There is some evidence, albeit modest, that top performers may actually witness cost savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":56181,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care Finance","volume":"38 3","pages":"50-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between the hospital quality alliance's pneumonia measures and discharge costs.\",\"authors\":\"Shadi Saleh,&nbsp;Mark Callan,&nbsp;Kassem Kassak\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article examines the association between performance on the Hospital Quality Alliance's (HQA's) pneumonia measures and costs associated with pneumonia discharges.</p><p><strong>Study population: </strong>Patients with pneumonia discharges (primary pneumonia diagnosis, ICD-9 codes 480-487) in New York hospitals (n = 189) during 2005 (n = 48,574). Discharges were excluded if the patient was younger than 18, discharged dead, or was transferred in from or out to an acute care facility.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The study is cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>The study outcome measure was hospital-level pneumonia discharges-related costs. The main independent variable comprised hospitals' performance on the three HQA pneumonia measures that are part of the \\\"starter set.\\\" The hospital was the unit of analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of a composite score measure, as well as the three individual measures, allowed for the identification of some differential impact among the measures. For example, optimal performance on the oxygenation assessment measure was found to be negatively associated with discharge costs, whereas there was no significant association between the composite scores or each of the other two measures and costs. An observation worth noting is the borderline, significant inverse relationship between being in the top 10 percent performance category of the oxygenation assessment measures and reduced discharge costs, which persisted even after controlling for length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providers should not be dissuaded from actively engaging in quality improvement efforts due to concerns over the costs required to provide high quality care. There is some evidence, albeit modest, that top performers may actually witness cost savings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Care Finance\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"50-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Care Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文探讨医院质量联盟(HQA)肺炎措施绩效与肺炎出院相关成本之间的关系。研究人群:2005年期间纽约医院的肺炎出院患者(诊断为原发性肺炎,ICD-9代码480-487)(n = 189) (n = 48,574)。如果患者年龄小于18岁,出院时死亡,或从急性护理机构转入或转出,则排除出院。研究设计:本研究为横断面研究。测量指标:研究结果测量指标为院内肺炎出院相关费用。主要的自变量包括医院在HQA肺炎三项指标上的表现,这些指标是“入门集”的一部分。医院是分析单位。结果:使用综合评分措施,以及三个单独的措施,允许识别一些差异的影响措施之间。例如,氧合评估指标的最佳绩效与排放成本呈负相关,而综合得分或其他两项指标与成本之间没有显著相关性。值得注意的一个观察结果是,在氧合评估措施的前10%的表现类别与减少的出院成本之间存在着临界的、显著的负相关关系,即使在控制住院时间后,这种关系仍然存在。结论:不应因为担心提供高质量护理所需的成本而劝阻提供者积极参与质量改进工作。尽管证据不多,但有一些证据表明,表现最好的企业实际上可能会节省成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The association between the hospital quality alliance's pneumonia measures and discharge costs.

Objective: This article examines the association between performance on the Hospital Quality Alliance's (HQA's) pneumonia measures and costs associated with pneumonia discharges.

Study population: Patients with pneumonia discharges (primary pneumonia diagnosis, ICD-9 codes 480-487) in New York hospitals (n = 189) during 2005 (n = 48,574). Discharges were excluded if the patient was younger than 18, discharged dead, or was transferred in from or out to an acute care facility.

Study design: The study is cross-sectional.

Measures: The study outcome measure was hospital-level pneumonia discharges-related costs. The main independent variable comprised hospitals' performance on the three HQA pneumonia measures that are part of the "starter set." The hospital was the unit of analysis.

Results: The use of a composite score measure, as well as the three individual measures, allowed for the identification of some differential impact among the measures. For example, optimal performance on the oxygenation assessment measure was found to be negatively associated with discharge costs, whereas there was no significant association between the composite scores or each of the other two measures and costs. An observation worth noting is the borderline, significant inverse relationship between being in the top 10 percent performance category of the oxygenation assessment measures and reduced discharge costs, which persisted even after controlling for length of stay.

Conclusions: Providers should not be dissuaded from actively engaging in quality improvement efforts due to concerns over the costs required to provide high quality care. There is some evidence, albeit modest, that top performers may actually witness cost savings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Care Finance
Journal of Health Care Finance Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Health Care Finance is the only quarterly journal devoted solely to helping you meet your facility"s financial goals. Each issue targets a key area of health care finance. Stay alert to new trends, opportunities, and threats. Make easier, better decisions, with advice from industry experts. Learn from the experiences of other health care organizations. Experts in the field share their experiences on successful programs, proven strategies, practical management tools, and innovative alternatives. The Journal covers today"s most complex dollars-and-cents issues, including hospital/physician contracts, alternative delivery systems, generating maximum margins under PPS.
期刊最新文献
Cost of Practice Transformation in Primary Care: Joining an Accountable Care Organization. Equity Issuance of Health Care Firms after the 2007 Market Crash and the 2010 Affordable Care Act Value of Physician Performance in Diabetes System of Care Among the Elderly Medicare Patients: Implications for Pay-for-Performance Assessing the cost burden of United States FDA-mandated post-approval studies for medical devices. The Growing Importance of Cost Accounting for Hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1