灼口综合征的疼痛和疼痛行为:一项疼痛日记研究。

Journal of orofacial pain Pub Date : 2012-01-01
Heli Forssell, Tuija Teerijoki-Oksa, Ulla Kotiranta, Rosita Kantola, Marjaliina Bäck, Tiina-Riitta Vuorjoki-Ranta, Maria Siponen, Ari Leino, Pauli Puukka, Ann-Mari Estlander
{"title":"灼口综合征的疼痛和疼痛行为:一项疼痛日记研究。","authors":"Heli Forssell,&nbsp;Tuija Teerijoki-Oksa,&nbsp;Ulla Kotiranta,&nbsp;Rosita Kantola,&nbsp;Marjaliina Bäck,&nbsp;Tiina-Riitta Vuorjoki-Ranta,&nbsp;Maria Siponen,&nbsp;Ari Leino,&nbsp;Pauli Puukka,&nbsp;Ann-Mari Estlander","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To characterize pain related to primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS) in terms of intensity, interference, and distress caused by the pain, as well as factors influencing the pain across a period of 2 weeks, and to study the use of coping and management strategies on a daily basis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-two female patients with primary BMS completed a 2-week pain diary. Pain intensity, interference, distress, and mood on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS), as well as pain amplifying and alleviating factors, were recorded three times a day. The use of treatments (medication or other means) and coping strategies were recorded at the end of each day. Coefficient of variation, repeated measures analysis of variance, and correlative methods were used to assess the between- and within-subject variation, pain patterns, and associations between various pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall mean pain intensity score of the 14 diary days was 3.1 (SD: 1.7); there was considerable variation in pain intensity between patients. Most patients experienced intermittent pain. On average, pain intensity increased from the morning to the evening. Intercorrelations between pain intensity, interference, distress, and mood were high, varying between rs = .75 and rs = .93 (P < .001). Pungent or hot food or beverages, stress, and tiredness were the most frequently mentioned pain-amplifying factors. The corresponding pain-alleviating factors were eating, sucking pastilles, drinking cold beverages, and relaxation. Thirty (58%) patients used pain medication and 35% reported using other means to alleviate their BMS pain. There was large variation in the use of coping strategies -between subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were considerable differences in pain, in factors influencing the pain, and in pain behavior across BMS patients. This indicates that patient information and education as well as treatment of BMS pain should be individualized.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"26 2","pages":"117-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain and pain behavior in burning mouth syndrome: a pain diary study.\",\"authors\":\"Heli Forssell,&nbsp;Tuija Teerijoki-Oksa,&nbsp;Ulla Kotiranta,&nbsp;Rosita Kantola,&nbsp;Marjaliina Bäck,&nbsp;Tiina-Riitta Vuorjoki-Ranta,&nbsp;Maria Siponen,&nbsp;Ari Leino,&nbsp;Pauli Puukka,&nbsp;Ann-Mari Estlander\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To characterize pain related to primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS) in terms of intensity, interference, and distress caused by the pain, as well as factors influencing the pain across a period of 2 weeks, and to study the use of coping and management strategies on a daily basis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-two female patients with primary BMS completed a 2-week pain diary. Pain intensity, interference, distress, and mood on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS), as well as pain amplifying and alleviating factors, were recorded three times a day. The use of treatments (medication or other means) and coping strategies were recorded at the end of each day. Coefficient of variation, repeated measures analysis of variance, and correlative methods were used to assess the between- and within-subject variation, pain patterns, and associations between various pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall mean pain intensity score of the 14 diary days was 3.1 (SD: 1.7); there was considerable variation in pain intensity between patients. Most patients experienced intermittent pain. On average, pain intensity increased from the morning to the evening. Intercorrelations between pain intensity, interference, distress, and mood were high, varying between rs = .75 and rs = .93 (P < .001). Pungent or hot food or beverages, stress, and tiredness were the most frequently mentioned pain-amplifying factors. The corresponding pain-alleviating factors were eating, sucking pastilles, drinking cold beverages, and relaxation. Thirty (58%) patients used pain medication and 35% reported using other means to alleviate their BMS pain. There was large variation in the use of coping strategies -between subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were considerable differences in pain, in factors influencing the pain, and in pain behavior across BMS patients. This indicates that patient information and education as well as treatment of BMS pain should be individualized.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orofacial pain\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"117-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orofacial pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对原发性灼口综合征(BMS)患者进行为期2周的疼痛强度、干扰、疼痛引起的痛苦及影响疼痛的因素分析,并研究患者日常应对和管理策略的使用情况。方法:52例女性原发性BMS患者完成为期2周的疼痛日记。每天三次记录疼痛强度、干扰、痛苦和情绪(NRS)(0 - 10),以及疼痛放大和缓解因素。每天结束时记录治疗(药物或其他手段)和应对策略的使用情况。使用变异系数、重复测量方差分析和相关方法来评估受试者之间和受试者内部的差异、疼痛模式以及各种疼痛评分之间的关联。结果:14 d疼痛强度评分为3.1 (SD: 1.7);患者之间的疼痛强度有相当大的差异。大多数患者经历间歇性疼痛。平均而言,疼痛强度从早上到晚上都在增加。疼痛强度、干扰、痛苦和情绪之间的相关性很高,rs = 0.75 ~ 0.93 (P < 0.001)。辛辣或热的食物或饮料、压力和疲劳是最常被提及的疼痛放大因素。相应的缓解疼痛的因素是进食、吸颗粒、喝冷饮和放松。30名(58%)患者使用止痛药,35%的患者报告使用其他方法来减轻BMS疼痛。不同研究对象在应对策略的使用上存在很大差异。结论:BMS患者在疼痛、疼痛影响因素和疼痛行为方面存在显著差异。这表明患者信息和教育以及BMS疼痛的治疗应该个体化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pain and pain behavior in burning mouth syndrome: a pain diary study.

Aims: To characterize pain related to primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS) in terms of intensity, interference, and distress caused by the pain, as well as factors influencing the pain across a period of 2 weeks, and to study the use of coping and management strategies on a daily basis.

Methods: Fifty-two female patients with primary BMS completed a 2-week pain diary. Pain intensity, interference, distress, and mood on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS), as well as pain amplifying and alleviating factors, were recorded three times a day. The use of treatments (medication or other means) and coping strategies were recorded at the end of each day. Coefficient of variation, repeated measures analysis of variance, and correlative methods were used to assess the between- and within-subject variation, pain patterns, and associations between various pain scores.

Results: The overall mean pain intensity score of the 14 diary days was 3.1 (SD: 1.7); there was considerable variation in pain intensity between patients. Most patients experienced intermittent pain. On average, pain intensity increased from the morning to the evening. Intercorrelations between pain intensity, interference, distress, and mood were high, varying between rs = .75 and rs = .93 (P < .001). Pungent or hot food or beverages, stress, and tiredness were the most frequently mentioned pain-amplifying factors. The corresponding pain-alleviating factors were eating, sucking pastilles, drinking cold beverages, and relaxation. Thirty (58%) patients used pain medication and 35% reported using other means to alleviate their BMS pain. There was large variation in the use of coping strategies -between subjects.

Conclusion: There were considerable differences in pain, in factors influencing the pain, and in pain behavior across BMS patients. This indicates that patient information and education as well as treatment of BMS pain should be individualized.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of orofacial pain
Journal of orofacial pain 医学-牙科与口腔外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Way forward Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating intraoral orthopedic appliances for temporomandibular disorders. Neuroplasticity in the adaptation to prosthodontic treatment. Temporomandibular disorder pain after whiplash trauma: a systematic review. Why seek treatment for temporomandibular disorder pain complaints? A study based on semi-structured interviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1